Sentences with phrase «personal god of»

I'm busy with my own personal god of war.

If only you could believe in a personal God of providence who initiates action for the world's good and who answers prayer; and if only you could believe in life after death!»

The Christian faith because it believes in a personal God of love believes also in the perpetuation of human personality.

About God there is considerable doubt and uncertainty, not only in the secular world but in Christian circles as well, with various attempts to preserve the meaning and value of God for human experience without the personal God of historic Christian faith.

Belief in the personal god of religions is despite invalidating evidence.

If there were a god it is not the personal god of religions.

This should not be confused with Brahms, the name of a personal god of the Hindu trinity.

If Einstein actually said that you have to take it in context with the «God» that he said that he believed in, Spinoza's God, which is nothing like the personal God of Christians, but more like a poetic way of describing the natural laws that govern the universe.

He probably would have demanded, «Will you give up your personal gods of procrastination, perfectionism and the pursuit of trivia?»

We do not know what, if anything, was pre-Big Bang and a god is one of many possibilities, but that is a long way from the personal gods of religion for which there is no evidence.

Not exact matches

Every image in this review was captured on my personal PlayStation 4 Pro from a retail version of «God of War.»

Osteen's personal wealth, and his advocacy for a theology that glorifies material possessions as a sign of God's favor, have long made him a controversial figure in church circles.

I am fascinated by the billboard displaying the four letters of God's personal name... YHWH Even Indiana Jones knows His name... Ezekiel 6:13: And they will have to know that I am Jehovah.

Before the «Dispensation of Grace» of God, by which we are saved through «Faith in Jesus Christ» as Lord and our personal Savior, Jesus Christ fulfilled the «Law of God» on our behalf during His ministry on earth, died on the «Holy Cross» for the «Remission of Our Sins» once and for all, descended to hell and defeated death, then rose from the dead on the third day bringing us «Eternal Life» and «Reconciliation» with God the Father!

You tend to side with some idea of a personal God and idealize that God as lovey - dovey — at other times (though far less) you are clearly «Atheish».

Undoubtedly, Jesus still loves us all more than either of us could ever fathom but the only way you, me, we're going to be able to live fulfilled and victorious lives is by accepting God's truths as they truly are in the bible and by leaning on His grace for empowerment to walk in them in our personal relationships with him.

I know nothing of your personal situation, but I have met many atheists who were once believers, some great tragedy struck them and they feel that God didn't act.

He's a Thomist in terms of «epistemology,» which means that he believes that we're, by nature, all about both economic liberty and the truth about the personal, relational God.

You are disregarding the sacredness of one's personal submission to God in the manner (perhaps previous baptism) chosen by the individual / s themselves.

In its intrinsic supernatural reality, marriage includes three goods: the good of exclusive, personal, reciprocal fidelity (the bonum fidei), the good of welcoming children and educating them to know God (the bonum prolis), and the good of the indissolubility or indestructibility of the bond, the permanent foundation of which is the indissoluble union of Christ and the Church, which is sacramentally represented by the marriage (the bonum sacramenti).

I am sorry there are people that have no faith in God, but I am more saddened by the efforts of ALL in this discussion to cast words of hate on others in some personal attempt at achieving self - worth at the expense of someone else's belief (or non-belief).

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

I think we are too quick to depersonalize this and miss that we are talking about complex individuals who are trying to figure out, like all of us, what it means to be made in the image and likeness of God and yet have a whole intact personal identity which can include same - sex attraction.

A person can hold a personal view of God that does not depend on any organized religion.

Few can match Job for pure misery, a man who went from immense personal wealth and happiness to utter nothingness in a matter of days, and fewer can match him for stony faith — a resolute, steely trust that God had an answer, even if that answer didn't really make sense from an earthly perspective.

You actually begin to know God and just as with any relationship the more personal and intimate the greater the depth of knowledge.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

Even Darwin believed in God but got mad at Him because of personal events in his life (or so I have read).

Religious leaders free themselves from the obligation of talking about evil, by pretending that it's only a matter of free will and people can choose what they want and the consequences are only personal («between you and God»).

You can deny the existense of God but you can not deny a persons personal story of how he changed their life!

If you believe that Christian doctrine is essentially an attempt to capture dimensions of human experience that defy precise expression in language because of personal and cultural limitations, then the truth about God, the human condition, salvation, and the like can never be adequately posited once and for all; on the contrary, the church must express ever and anew its experience of the divine as mediated through Jesus Christ.

Also a personal pet peeve of mine is when people suggest that suicide is a sin which implies that person goes to Hell... I believe someone who is at the point that they take their life is already in Hell... I can not believe in a God who would do that.

Not that we are fit (qualified and sufficient in ability) of ourselves to form personal judgments or to claim or count anything as coming from us, but our power and ability and sufficiency are from God.

Rather than looking at corporate work as the evil scourge of the earth (though you certainly want to make sure your personal values align with an organization's corporate values), riding the elevator to the 11th floor every day may be exactly where God needs you to develop your spiritual character, your gifts and to reach those who are broken, empty and living without knowing their Savior.

I have my own personal relationship with God, and it is none of your business.

As Anton LaVey explained in his classic work The Satanic Bible, Man — using his brain — invented all the Gods, doing so because many of our species can not accept or control their personal egos, feeling compelled to conjure up one or a multiplicity of characters who can act without hindrance or guilt upon whims and desires.

I believe deeply in God, and find it weird all of these «chaplains» who are so weeble wobbly on their relationship with a personal Savior in Christ.

They could, but you would get as many answers as there are people, because belief is a very personal thing and we all craft our gods in our own image... or in the image of what we fear most.

Although I was raised in a Christian family and charismatic, fundamentalist church, attended a Bible college, and had professed the Christian faith for years, it wasn't until this experience that my intellectual assent of God's truth became deeply personal.

People like you really have to get your head out of the bible; spirituality is about your own PERSONAL relationship with god, not the dogma in some stupid old book

I would argue that any further knowledge of / about God can not happen if you remain behind the line of belief, whether you can factually prove anything empirically (that you can make God prove Himself at will) or use the vehicle of myth, legend, story or subjective and very personal experiences too extraordinary for words to fully convey.

I think goverment and God should be two seperate ent «ities, when it effects the personal lives of people.

And also my personal opinion is that it is not the sin of betrayal of son of God it is that Judas missed out on Jesus's reconciliation ministry.

All Gods are thus externalized forms, magnified projections of the true nature of their creators, personifying aspects of the universe or personal temperaments which many of their followers find to be troubling.

So marriage is, for Christians, the primordial sacrament, the sacrament that's most deeply the visible sign of the presence of God or personal logos in the world.

Hearing the audible voice of God is a gift to some and usually it not for personal gain but more about protection and guidance.

I've had seasons of utter personal darkness where the one point of contact and truth I desired was a manifestation of God's reality in my life and circumstances.

And I believe that it is very arrogant of people to claim that only their personal interpretation of their favorite translation of the bible constitutes the entirety of God's revelation to humanity.

Some use religious terminology to describe personal experience and belief but do not believe in any of it literally and reject all traditional notions of deity, relying upon cohesive natural law as «god.»

EvolvedDNA «why is it rude to call you on your myths» = > we can talk about gods of past that were man made but our God is a living God and some of us have a personal relationship with God because of what God has actually done in our lives.