Sentences with phrase «personal injury plaintiff because»

How This Case Affects Indiana Personal Injury Plaintiffs This case created some favorable law for Indiana personal injury plaintiff because it clearly held that fraudulent concealment will toll the statute of limitations for a tort action and that the plaintiff will then have a full 2 - year period to bring the suit.

That being said, the doctrine of assumption of the risk can still work against a Florida personal injury plaintiff because a jury can take a plaintiff's assumption of the risks involved in an activity into account when determining the relative fault of each party.

While Florida's law is different from that applied in the case, the case is still instructive to Florida personal injury plaintiffs because the division of fault between the plaintiff and the defendant is an issue for the jury to determine.

However, if the court later chooses to adopt the doctrine of circuity, that may have a detrimental affect on New Mexico personal injury plaintiffs because it acts to limit the avenues of recovery available to plaintiffs.

Not exact matches

The plaintiffs filed a personal injury lawsuit against the company, claiming that it was responsible for the driver's actions because he was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.

Further, as a report from Eastern Tennessee State University explains, plaintiffs often are able to win their cases in court because of close teamwork practiced between private investigators and personal injury attorneys.

Plaintiffs argued that evidence of failure to use a seat belt should be excluded because that conduct could not have caused the accident, and a plaintiff should not be required to anticipate negligent conduct by the defendant; the Court rejected that argument based largely on the language of the proportionate responsibility statute, which focuses on the various parties» roles in causing «the personal injury» or the «harm for which recovery of damages is sought,» rather than simply the occurrence that led to the injury.

The case is interesting and relevant to Florida accident victims because it illustrates the difficulties that Florida personal injury plaintiffs may encounter when dealing with insurance companies after an accident.

Because New Mexico personal injury cases can be so difficult to try, it is important for plaintiffs to have competent legal counsel at their side from the beginning.

This case illustrates how important it is for Indiana personal injury plaintiffs to retain dedicated counsel who will diligently handle their case because even the most seemingly insignificant oversight can result in the waiver of certain rights.

Recently, an appellate court issued an opinion in a personal injury case finding that summary judgment should be granted because the plaintiff did not properly respond to the defendant's motion.

The industry claims they are not loans but investments because the plaintiffs in personal - injury cases do not have to pay the money back if there is no settlement or other award.

The personal injury bar's argument against limiting noneconomic damages — that a jury's award of noneconomic damages should not be reduced to an amount determined by legislators because a jury can determine on a case - by - case basis to what extent to compensate a plaintiff for harm suffered — fails to address the difference between noneconomic damages and economic damages, and fails to take into account the intangibility of noneconomic damages awards.