Sentences with phrase «personal issues people»

A family counselor must understand the different social, economical, and personal issues people of all ages may face.

Not exact matches

Only two days after entering office, he issued an executive order stating that prisoners «shall in all circumstances be treated humanely and shall not be subjected to violence to life and person (including murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture), nor to outrages upon personal dignity (including humiliating and degrading treatment).»

This is the same as blaming other people for how you feel, or your personal issues.

I think it addresses a lot of questions and issues that people experience in their personal and professional lives that don't get talked about a lot.

It's about people: human - to - human interaction, and the underlying issues with running a business that tend to run opposite of personal development.

He has been a well - liked person and he clearly mishandled this from a public relations point of view, and clearly he's got to work out his personal issues.

«I have personal issues of «seeing how other people live.»»

If people become comfortable sharing feedback — good, bad and ugly — about your personal performance, they are more likely to do the same when it comes to critical business issues.

While people have raised privacy concerns — a common issue for any tracking app — Chaudhary says that ClassDojo does not share or sell any personal information.

Have a group lunch or another activity that can get the new hire to get to meet everyone, and connect new people to employees who can advise them on personal issues like housing or child care.

«It's one thing for a marketer to try to predict if people like Coke or Pepsi,» he said, «but it's another thing for them to predict things that are much more central to our identity and what's more personal in how I interact with the world in terms of social and cultural issues.»

Likewise, Henke highlighted the issue of possible «oversharing» in the workplace, which she said is a particular issue for young people who may endeavour to be their authentic selves and, in the process, forget the important of distinguishing between your professional self and your personal self.

The pardon issue isn't theoretical, as the New York Times reported last month that Trump's former personal lawyer John Dowd discussed pardons with several people charged by Mueller, including Manafort.

This can be a controversial issue (see this example on porn + the internet), it can be tied to a famous person (see this one on Steve Jobs + consumer feedback), or it can be tied to a personal story.

Lastly only data results that would concern me is the clientele bias of Personal Capital and it's not an issue as long as you consider who is signing up for PC, my guess is the that most people who sign up have positive net worth's, someone who receives a welfare or unemployment check is highly unlikely to want to know their net worth.

The IRS is seeking substantial personal information about people who aren't specifically being investigated for tax compliance issues, which the agency shouldn't be allowed to do.

People just take sick leave, or short - term disability leave, or even worse, vacation days to take care of personal issues.

Facebook's senior executives have been summoned to account for the platform's privacy issues in hearings with UK lawmakers, while the US Federal Trade Commission is launching its own investigation into the platform's use of people's personal data.

I guess I'm one of the very few people living in the 21st century, where the religious belive of a person are their own personal issue.

Its an issue in human rights and separation of church and state and that all people have rights despite the wish of a few relgions to push their personal beliefs on others.

my personal issue is with organized religion and the fact that there are people out there who prey on the weak - minded for insane amounts of income.

Simply put, the assumption is that the best route to the truth is to assemble a wide variety of persons who have some personal involvement with aspects of a particular issue, hold hearings and meetings, write papers, and then vote in committee and convention on what the Christian position ought to be.

I know people who for personal reasons are for or against certain religious / social / political issues who migrated to religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree with these peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.

Let's back up and see what we have: Two people with clear personal issues.

Whenever someone publicizes their personal opinion about the hot - button issues of our day, it's instantly met by a dozen rebuttals or counterarguments from people on the opposite side of the issue.

I don't understand how some random persons personal belief could cause you grief unless it was indicative of a deeper issue.

So do the customers, Debbie, and most people in business usually keep personal issues out of professional venues.

It seems to my perceptions that you might be having a personal identity conundrum... Speaking from experience; many folks seem unable to cope with individualized rationalizing complexities... Giving up attempting, toward understanding social austerities which encompass individualism, gives people their identification of oneness... Individualisms are set upon the relativities of quaint somberness issues in daily moderations... Religious identities are as emotionalized labels giving people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental reasoning... Whether or not, religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to serve...

Maybe instead of just barraging people with personal opinions — typically based on nothing but our personal viewpoint — we should seek some expert advice on the issue.

In contrast, two males who are in love and true and faithful to each other — or two females who are deeply committed in romance and in mutual care — well, enough of us now * know * people like that in our own churches and in our music ministries and among our sons and daughters that we instinctively hold back from hammering on the issue UNLESS we have a control complex or a deep personal sexual struggle.

I think the only thing that will really be invitational, missional, relational, and humble, particularly when coming from people who have no personal experience with the issue, will be to accept gay Christians for who they are and accept their choice to be either partnered or celibate.

Thus the «right to die» campaign was able to represent the issue as a general referendum «on getting government out of this important personal decision,» and «on returning control of end of life decisions to where it belongs - with the dying person.»

I choose not to debate issues with people, especially not issues that are personal to my identity.

Each person should describe the problem from a personal perspective, the counselor making sure that each has comparable opportunities to speak on all issues.

By social ethic I do not mean something opposed to a personal ethic, but one which is concerned with the issues between groups and nations where the decisions taken alter the lives of multitudes of people and the direction of history.

These were not people still struggling with personal identity issues and zigzagging their way through young adulthood.

Nevertheless, besides the issue of natural justice, I think that desire is defined as something that is considered to have a so - called positive outcome, so I would think that on a personal level self - immolation has no personal desire (unless «fame» and / or desire to die are there) and it is surely painful to the person self - immolating (unlike e.g. self - explosion), and the thing being probably considered by individual persons as social sacrifice.

I try to understand that from the many sides of the issue, people's views and opinions are often deeply rooted in sometimes very painful and personal experiences.

Be done with Feds in personal life of consenting adults and stop making this a religious issue people have rights to their own religious beliefs as well as personal beliefs.

The issue is the mandates to force people to spend thier personal private monies on something that violates their core beliefs.

This is, of course, the issue addressed on a more personal level in Rabbi Harold Kushner's highly popular When Bad Things Happen to Good People, reassessing a conflict at least as ancient as the biblical Book of Job.

For this very issue, I try out update my personal blogs almost like I am speaking to a person or discussing with that audience directly web site esteem it helps participate people greater than publishing content formally especially when my blog situated surrounding the goings ons, regular thoughts and analysis about this to some degree controversial issue.

In recent years, both through theological - ethical reflection and through personal friendships with some remarkable gay persons, I have become increasingly convinced that the positions of both Barth and Thielicke inadequately express the implications of the gospel on this issue.

Some will criticise us for giving him the oxygen of publicity, for publishing heresy, or for unhelpfully confusing people who may be struggling with this issue on a personal level.

If the standard for being ready is having total financial freedom, owning a home, being done with all education, having no personal issues at all, having a retirement plan, and so forth, no wonder so many people say they're not ready!

Another issue I have with all this is that even if someone is gay what affect does that have on your own personal life, it has nothing to do with you, just because you don't believe in it or don't accept it doesn't mean you can treat gay people wrongly (that's a sin also) they're not animals they are human beings..

My accounts are pretty popular and I'm sure there are people that have thought that by looking at them, but I promise behind the happy photos there are lots of insecurities and hang ups, there are big personal issues, struggles with health things, stresses over running a business and becoming a public figure that people can openly pull apart.

«When people buy products, it's about personal identity, social - context issues, vanity, how they look in front of friends,» Kelley says.

Now that the issue is much more prominent than with the Bruin player, I would love to see another front - page piece from the hockey editor reinforcing the seemingly obvious ideals that the office is bigger than the person who currently holds it, and that if one really wishes to see a decline in political divisiveness and overheated rhetoric, one has an obligation to make personal contributions to those ends.

But I think a more constructive discussion is one that focuses on the actual issues created by the use of Native American mascots rather than one person's personal sense of disrespect at the use of the term.