Sentences with phrase «personal opinions»

That's it Phil, no personal attacks, no hatred, mostly facts with some personal observations that are my personal opinions.

So even if Mr Fox thinks he knows my own thoughts, for everyone's information I will give you my personal opinions (and remember it is an opinion, not a religion!)

You don't have to take things personal opinions will always be divided.

You are focusing mostly on appearance (based on your personal opinions).

All that talk about him not tested in the EPL and la liga is not the same... well you can call that your «personal opinions» and fear of an unknown.

Just giving me their personal opinions.

Speaking of personal opinions, Wenger is the KING at that and you worship him so I don't think personal opinions here are a problem.

Why you try debating personal opinions is beyond me.

You were mentioning above the issue of recipes not being subject to copyright — easy way to fix that is to inject a few personal opinions into the instructions i.e., «I find it easier to do such - and - such.»

Sian Porter, Chairman of the BDA's Communications Board said: «With so many people online claiming to be «experts» in the field of food and nutrition, it is vital that people have a point of contact where they know that information being given out and promoted is credible, evidenced - based and based on solid scientific research, as opposed to personal opinions and people trying to sell you all kinds of products.

I think as consumers we should be wary of avoiding a certain product simply due to skepticism — it's one thing to recommend not using a product because it has scientifically been proven to cause harm; it's another to recommend not using a product because of subjective reasons, such as how creepy the fact is that X. campestris is the culprit of black rot on crucifers (or personal opinions of the FDA)... yes, X. campestris is used to ferment sugars to produce xanthan gum, but the fact that it causes rotting of crucifers is unrelated (and doesn't suddenly make xanthan gum harmful).

Limiting as it sounds, I haven't let my personal opinions of this feathered fellow cloud the fact that others love this lean and clean protein.

For example if you are looking for a business opportunity why not go to a discussion forum and get some personal opinions.

So while my blog DOES contain plenty of my own personal opinions, I tried to gather information that is as factual as possible to present it here.

And, foreign policies are not shaped by your personal opinions; your two cents worth in dong is noted for whatever it's worth.

And your own personal opinions don't mean a thing.

So, our natural inclination is to shape Jesus into something more palatable to our personal opinions and preferences.

If I can not, by sheer force of will, change my personal opinions from «I don't believe that happened» to «that most - certainly, without a doubt, happened,» then I don't get the prize.

Others may have their personal opinions and agendas, but he alone truly teaches it «as it is».

People need to stop making this about some forceful - willing of our personal opinions to somehow mutate from «incredulous» to «belief without any doubts whatsoever.»

Because the judge is, by definition, operating without guidance from positive law, it is almost certain that his personal opinions will turn out to be what society «needs».»

Who gets to pick and choose what part of the Bible is to be followed in today's culture, and why should we rely on their personal opinions about it?

Why would his personal opinions not matter?

Only those posting here chiming in their personal opinions.

But there are also a lot of petty disagreements and personal opinions that aren't really worth spending time arguing about.

Are these some of the reasons why the «fundamentals» want to recind separation of church & state; to impose their personal opinions?

It's a shame that he uses his position and popularity to put forth his own personal opinions.

Nor do your personal opinions about what is in the bible apply.

In doing so, preachers of the early church were not merely expressing their personal opinions or providing entertainment to their listeners.

Paul frequently offered his personal opinions.

He takes faithful characters who humbly place their trust in God and portrays them in a negative light of ignorance and doubt, often with his personal opinions which tend to be mundane and superficial in nature.

It involves, not belief in the sense of personal opinions, but rather a set of actions (saying certain things, going to services, doing good works, etc.) that can be done in the absence of belief — indeed the nature of a wager makes it such that you fully admit you don't know, which is actually an agnostic atti.tude toward the idea of God's existence.

Personal opinions are personal conclusions rooted in personal perception.

Opinions of critics, however high their repute, are only personal opinions.

Everyone nowadays is trying to show up other people's biases, or maybe even detect their own, but choose Jesus sayings by consensus and personal opinions... this makes one shake one's head.

I find it extremely offensive to generalize an entire denomination of Christianity based on your personal opinions.

McGrath's quotations include Richard Dawkins» fellow evolutionary theorist D. S. Wilson's put down of the God Delusion author as: «just another angry atheist trading on his reputation as an evolutionist and spokesperson for science to vent his personal opinions about religion.»

Maybe instead of just barraging people with personal opinions — typically based on nothing but our personal viewpoint — we should seek some expert advice on the issue.

I define selective literalism as the tendency to elevate certain biblical principles over others in order to best accommodate one's personal opinions.

Hence, the relativity of personal opinions is radically transcended.

Leave your personal opinions about someone's religion at home when you vote this election.

Well, regardless of my strong personal opinions about the Warner's christian evangelism, this is still a good story, IMHO, and it sounds like they have, and are continuing to make efforts to do some good in the world.

Just as all these comments are our own personal opinions.

What about right to privacy and you wanting to «restrict» someone based on personal opinions don't you get?

Most conservative evangelicals have been taught that personal opinions and cultural views are worthless unless they can make direct appeal to a biblical warrant of some sort.

It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.

My objective system is not dependent on my personal opinions.

That's the beauty of personal opinions, and the beauty of religion: We can all choose to worship whichever god we want!

I know people who for personal reasons are for or against certain religious / social / political issues who migrated to religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree with these peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.

Subjective information or writing is based on personal opinions, interpretations, points of view, emotions and judgment.