Not exact matches
In short: Trump, a man whom other countries have frequently and successfully manipulated, appears set to have
personal talks with the leader of an extremely dangerous country on an
issue where the
stakes are literally nuclear.
And at
stake in the dialogue
in «our classes, our refectory, the suburban congregations
in Westchester, the inner - city congregations of Brooklyn, and the bureaucratic part - time jobs at the Interchurch Center is a central
issue: How does one achieve and combine authentic
personal spirituality with equally authentic public spirituality?
In general, those who have the strongest personal stake in and the most immediate connection to the school are the ones who should tackle the issue
In general, those who have the strongest
personal stake in and the most immediate connection to the school are the ones who should tackle the issue
in and the most immediate connection to the school are the ones who should tackle the
issues.
«such a
personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of
issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions...»
Maybe what is new is the democracy theme, which assumes that everyone has a
stake in the public domain, can be affected by public stress, and can be part of the solution through
personal action (such as talking about
issues in their social network) and collective action (by joining with others to work on change).
Maybe what is new is the democracy theme, which assumes that everyone has a
stake in the public domain, can be affected the public stress (Trump supporters included), and can be part of the solution through
personal action (such as talking about
issues in their social network) and collective action (by joining with others to work on change).