This is one of the times where regardless of
a persons views on global warming, the pollution effects of ethanol are real and need to be taken into account.
Not exact matches
Regarding an issue such as
global warming, the relevant question for a concerned
person (especially one with some expertise
on the matter) is not merely whether she / he expressed her / his
views once or twice, politely, or whether she wrote some papers or articles
on the matter.
The New York Times Magazine is running a long profile of Freeman Dyson, the independent - minded physicist and polymath from Princeton, N.J., who has come into the public eye of late because of his anti-consensual
views of
global warming — which are also different from the
views of many
people in the variegated assemblage of climate skeptic / denier / realists (depending
on who is describing them) fighting efforts to curb greenhouse gases.
In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against focusing too much
on trying to defeat those denying the widespread
view that greenhouse - driven climate change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of
people engaged at that end of the
global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»
But, as is so clear in considering the interface of science and society
on a host of tough issues — from nanotechnology and synthetic biology to
global warming — the
views of the average
person, let alone an elderly folkie, do matter.
So, while most
people receive their education
on global warming and alternative energy through mainstream media, they are only learning one point of
view (which leads to these so - called information cascades, which to me, is a $ 10 word for the fact that most
people are misinformed of the whole picture).
My point is this: In my
view, the Times should find out, and convey to the public (in one place and in organized fashion), the
views of each and every Congressperson, and
person running for Congress, regarding a moratorium
on coal - fired power plants (until their carbon dioxide emissions can be eliminated), a carbon «cap - and - auction» or «cap - and - trade» system, or carbon tax, and related matters having to do with
global warming.
Some
people, well - known for disputing the mainstream consensus
on climate science, are asking the judge to admit their
views in a friend of the court brief, asserting that «there is no agreement among climatologists as to the relative contributions of Man and Nature to the
global warming» of the past several decades.
You didn't like the exclusion of Spencer's essay «How serious is the
global warming threat» at the same time complaining that they did not exclude papers
on «Social science, education, research about
people's
views on climate».
«Perhaps worse, his message is very easily countered by
people such as Will as
global -
warming alarmism, shifting the focus back to their preferred emphasis
on scientific uncertainty and dueling expert
views.»
The Guardian reported that the Worldwide
Views on Climate and Energy consultation, which involved 10,000 citizens from 79 developed and developing countries, found that» [n] early two - thirds of
people believe that negotiators at key UN climate talks in December should do «whatever it takes» to limit
global warming to a 2 [degrees Celsius] rise.»
These
people are some of Obama's most passionate supporters,
people who worked hard to get him re-elected, in part because they
view him as a leader
on an issue they care deeply about —
global warming.
On the basis of our results, a 1 °C rise in environmental temperature would account for over 100 000 new diabetes cases per year in the USA alone, given a population of nearly 322 million people in 2015.38 These findings emphasize the importance of future research into the effects of environmental temperature on glucose metabolism and the onset of diabetes, especially in view of the global rise in temperatures with a new record set for the warmest winter in the USA last year.
On the basis of our results, a 1 °C rise in environmental temperature would account for over 100 000 new diabetes cases per year in the USA alone, given a population of nearly 322 million
people in 2015.38 These findings emphasize the importance of future research into the effects of environmental temperature
on glucose metabolism and the onset of diabetes, especially in view of the global rise in temperatures with a new record set for the warmest winter in the USA last year.
on glucose metabolism and the onset of diabetes, especially in
view of the
global rise in temperatures with a new record set for the
warmest winter in the USA last year.39
His
views on global warming are as relevant as any other wealthy
person.
He began looking at the
global warming issue and realized that the
people of Romania were only hearing the official Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC)
view sanctioned by their government.
I called the threat of catastrophic
global warming the «greatest hoax ever perpetrated
on the American
people,» a statement that, to put it mildly, was not
viewed kindly by environmental extremists and their elitist organizations.