Though there are numerous avenues that one might take in seeking to provide a non-Calvinistic
perspective on Scripture, the route I have chosen is to emphasize the biblical teaching on «faith alone» and contrast it with what is often taught in Calvinism.
Some years ago James Smart observed that one of the reasons the Bible is «strangely silent» in congregations is because pastors are not able to bring a «critical»
perspective on Scripture to bear on faith issues.5 With that in mind, I have attempted to address a biblically informed theological reflection to the key issues raised by transition in culture, church, and family.
Mesmerized by current trends, Porter turns patronizing when the Scholastics seem to her to get something like the subordination of women within marriage wrong, noting that they «did not have the kind of historical / critical
perspective on Scripture that would have enabled them to relativize these precepts.»
Not exact matches
In a fascinating historical treatment, Holy
Scripture and the Quest for Authority at the End of the Middle Ages, Ian Christopher Levy offers a new
perspective on this question.
The writers draw
on literature, philosophy and
scripture as well as
on sociological and psychological
perspectives.
I think it's you, based
on solid research into
Scripture from another
perspective.
The Christian community now possesses for the first time some excellent scholarly works
on the treatment of homosexuality in
Scripture, such as Robin Scroggs's The New Testament and Homosexuality (Fortress, 1984) and George Edwards's Gay / Lesbian Liberation: A Biblical
Perspective (Pilgrim, 1984).
Specifically, I want to provide Calvinists and non-Calvinists with a
perspective on certain passages of
Scripture which will hopefully allow people to see that there are viable alternatives to Calvinism and it's theological opposite, Arminianism.
I tend to agree with almost every interpretation or
perspective on how to read
scripture.
This can shed light
on a specific passage of
Scripture and offer great insight, truth and
perspective to your times of study.
Instead, it is, I think, those texts and traditions and teachings as I see them from within the true story of what God has done in Jesus Christ — and the whole
perspective on life and the world that flows from that story, as expressed definitively in
Scripture.»
I believe
scripture lands
on the side of the orthodox traditional
perspective.
Beginning with Genesis 1:1, I plan
on taking you verse by verse through the Bible to explain it from a historical - cultural
perspective, and in a way that exposes how religion has forced
Scripture to become its errand boy, when in reality,
Scripture should be leading us away from religion and into a deeper and more intimate relationship with God.
We must now examine more closely the
perspective in which Ricoeur carries
on his project of opening the way for the text of
Scripture to restore the «interval of interrogation» in which the question of faith can be heard.
Finally, when I say that God is
on the side of the poor, I do not mean that hermeneutically we must start with some ideologically interpreted context of oppression (for instance, a Marxist definition of the poor and their oppressed situation) and then reinterpret
Scripture from that ideological
perspective.
In many cases homiletical texts recommend a method of reading
scriptures aloud to gain an experiential
perspective on biblical texts and also to understand their bases in orality.
These are anabaptist, holiness, missional, generously orthodox leaning evangelicals (like myself) who see new
perspectives on an authoritative
scripture and new incarnational ways of doing church as the only way forward in a post-Christendom world.»
Instead of grounding her thinking here simply in
scripture and tradition, Farley draws as well
on secular
perspectives and contemporary experience.
Those who use a «theistic» compass, for instance, base moral decisions and
perspectives on religious belief
scripture, the teaching of a religious group, or the prevailing norms of a believing community.
All in all, there is little enthusiasm for a ressourcementthat would draw deeply
on the actual contents of our
Scripture - based, Sacramental - Liturgical Tradition, and would use these resources to challenge our contemporaries and ourselves to a conversion that would be not only a widening and deepening, but also a change of
perspective.
Prior to that, let me provide you with the various views or
perspectives on the Inspiration of
Scripture and make you guess which
perspective I will fall into.
Its limited vocabulary makes it perfect for younger readers, in English - as - a-second-language use, or even for longer - term Christians who just want a fresh
perspective on the scriptures.This unique
scripture version, originally designed to reach people who did not speak English as their native language, uses a limited vocabulary of 850 words to simply and clearly share God's truth...
Or I should say, it demonstrates how
Scripture ultimately leads one to the reformed
perspective if you follow
Scripture in its whole and not just concentrate
on the various parts in which you feel most comfortable.