Sentences with phrase «perspectives on climate science»

A measurement of the public's perspective on climate science will be taken before the plan is launched, and the same measurement will be taken at one or more as - yet - to - be-determined intervals as the plan is implemented,

Readers of your weblog are invited to read my postings at http://climatesci.atmos.colostate.edu if they would like to read a different perspective on climate science.

Not exact matches

An ad hoc committee was formed, with the group carefully composed to include the breadth and depth of expertise and perspectives needed to analyze all aspects of how surface temperatures are estimated and interpreted and to comment generally on climate science.

This has included informing Congress of statistical perspectives on climate change, advocating forensic science reform, and promoting risk - limiting audits to election officials.

Wallace S. Broecker: Preface 1: Jean - Pierre Gattuso and Lina Hansson: Ocean Acidification: Background and History 2: Richard E. Zeebe and Andy Ridgwell: Past Changes of Ocean Carbonate Chemistry 3: James C. Orr: Recent and Future Changes in Ocean Carbonate Chemistry 4: Andrew H. Knoll and Woodward W. Fischer: Skeletons and Ocean Chemistry: The Long View 5: Markus G. Weinbauer, Xavier Mari, and Jean - Pierre Gattuso: Effect of Ocean Acidification on the Diversity and Activity of Heterotrophic Marine Microorganisms 6: Ulf Riebesell and Philippe D. Tortell: Effects of Ocean Acidification on Pelagic Organisms and Ecosystems 7: Andreas J. Andersson, Fred T. Mackenzie, and Jean - Pierre Gattuso: Effects of Ocean Acidification on Benthic Processes, Organisms, and Ecosystems 8: Hans - Otto Pörtner, Magda Gutowska, Atsushi Ishimatsu, Magnus Lucassen, Frank Melzner, and Brad Seibel: Effects of Ocean Acidification on Nektonic Organisms 9: Stephen Widdicombe, John I. Spicer, and Vassilis Kitidis: Effects of Ocean Acidification on Sediment Fauna 10: James P. Barry, Stephen Widdicombe, and Jason M. Hall - Spencer: Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function 11: Frances Hopkins, Philip Nightingale, and Peter Liss: Effects of Ocean Acidification on the Marine Source of Atmospherically - Active Trace Gases 12: Marion Gehlen, Nicolas Gruber, Reidun Gangstø, Laurent Bopp, and Andreas Oschlies: Biogeochemical Consequences of Ocean Acidification and Feedback to the Earth System 13: Carol Turley and Kelvin Boot: The Ocean Acidification Challenges Facing Science and Society 14: Fortunat Joos, Thomas L. Frölicher, Marco Steinacher, and Gian - Kasper Plattner: Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Ocean Acidification Projections 15: Jean - Pierre Gattuso, Jelle Bijma, Marion Gehlen, Ulf Riebesell, and Carol Turley: Ocean Acidification: Knowns, Unknowns, and Perspectives Index

but all that is generally on the margins for a website like real climate that is about climate science, so I just plunk the broader perspective in occasionally in a throw - away line.

Roger Pielke Sr. (Colorado State) has a blog (Climate Science) that gives his personal perspective on climate change Climate Science) that gives his personal perspective on climate change climate change issues.

What you are calling «snarky» is likely merely a recognition of the inadequacy of your understanding of the intents as well as your inability in perspective to reporting on climate based on the relevant contexts of the science of global warming.

As much as Crichton's book presents wildly biased perspectives on Climate and environmental science, I have to thank him for two things — first for simply raising awareness, and second, for arguing the often missed point that mankind has not inherited a stable, «preservable» environment.

* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)

US CLIVAR, a US Climate Variability and Predictability Program, held a recent conference on Arctic Change and Its Influence on Mid-Latitude Climate and Weather Agenda https://usclivar.org/meetings/2017-arctic-midlatitude-workshop-agenda with many interesting science perspectives on this super interesting topic.

The U.S. National Science Foundation's Paleo Perspectives on Climate Change program provided funding for recent further developments of the RegEM algorithm.

It is the process by which the nearly 200 governments who belong to the United Nations agree on a single, official climate science perspective.

First, even if that were true, the state of the science is irrelevant to how most people determine their perspective on climate change - just as with evolution - because they are not actually familiar with the science at anything more than a superficial level.

There are other blogs where the pure science is debated, and others have their own perspective on the politics of climate change.

There is concern that the institutions of science are so mired in advocacy on the topic of dangerous anthropogenic climate change that the checks and balances in science, particularly with regard to minority perspectives, are broken.

I do hope that Judith writes a piece, giving her perspective on where this leaves climate science — I am rather confused!

«Perspective on Climate Change» (PDF), Testimony prepared by Bjorn Lomborg for the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality joint hearing with the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the Committee on Science and Technology on Wednesday March 21, 2007.

From van der Sluijs et al. paper «Beyond consensus: reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science:»

But what makes this one unique is the way it combines Mann's science communication skills, which help succinctly describe the roots, methods, and implications of climate science denial, and Toles» illustrations, which provide an equally biting and amusing perspective on the dynamics the book describes.

«The science of climate change continues to evolve and regardless of the outcome of the climate debate, observational data suggests that we may be served well by basing our climate agenda, scientifically and economically, on a broader perspective than that in the IPCC outline...

On June 20, Executive Vice President of the World Resources Institute Manish Bapna spoke to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology at a roundtable about science and policy perspectives on climate changOn June 20, Executive Vice President of the World Resources Institute Manish Bapna spoke to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology at a roundtable about science and policy perspectives on climate changon Science, Space and Technology at a roundtable about science and policy perspectives on climate Science, Space and Technology at a roundtable about science and policy perspectives on climate science and policy perspectives on climate changon climate change.

From the perspective of the International Climate Science Coalition, this book, «Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change» is worth far more than its weight in gold.

In contrast to the implications of the closing sentence of the RealClimate post, the blogosphere, with its diversity of venues and perspectives, is fostering a much broader conversation that has the potential to send climate science and its applications on a more useful track.

From a layperson's perspective whose only claim to knowledge in the area of your question is reading a history of Bayesian statistics, I would think that the question could be posed as how many papers on climate science use Bayesian statistics.

Michael serving as member of US Global Change Research Program's working group on «Climate Vulnerability and Social Science Perspectives»

This weekend, I am listening to the talks at the Rotman Institute Conference on Knowledge and Models in Climate Science: Philosophical, Historical and Scientific Perspectives.

From a legal perspective, it's slightly more nuanced than you have stated — the issue is not simply whether Steyn has defamed Mann, but whether he either knew what he said was untrue or showed a wilful disregard for the truth (at least on the assumption that Mann counts as a public figure on the subject of climate science in Law).

Around 2 years ago, I was honoured to be invited by geologist and long - time educator Tom Farmer to collaborate on a textbook that expounded on the principles of climate science as well as put climate change denial in perspective.

If Andrew Neil knew more about the science he might understand 1) how biased a perspective his chosen lines of questioning sometimes give on AGW, 2) that the IPCC's (AR4) suggested range for climate sensitivity is in line with the large body of evidence on the subject, and 2) how out on a limb scientists such as Judith Curry and Roy Spencer are from the mainstream evidence - based consensus.

I do follow this debate from a layman's perspective and the one thing I find really confusing is why when talking about climate science / climate change and the models being used, they never talk about weather modification programs that have been going on for over 70 years around the world.

And it should be noted, that although environmentalists like to claim that their perspectives are grounded in science, they are promiscuous with scientific facts: scientific consensus on climate, good; scientific consensus on the risks of GM crops, bad.

Climate Controversies — Perspectives on Recent Climate Science and Policy by James R. Fleming and Wesley A. Baff

While ideology shapes almost everyone's perspective on the world, problems / opportunities, and best paths forward, when it comes to to many self - proclaimed libertarians and climate science, the ideology requires rejecting reality.

This resource guide contains a wealth of learning resources on the fundamentals of climate science available that have been identified as important from a country perspective.

He goes on to suggest that while the science around climate change may be truly terrifying, using fear as a motivator has severe limitations (see my post on disasterbation turning you blind for my perspective on that one...).