Sentences with phrase «persuade judges and juries»

If you're a litigator, you probably have an easier time applying this concept because it's the same skill you use to persuade judges and juries to find in your clients» favour.

Among the topics covered in this book are «Five Keys to Telling a Compelling Story in the Courtroom,» «Ten Videos to Help Litigators Become Better at Storytelling,» «Great Courtroom Storytelling Articles From Trial Experts,» «Trial Presentation Errors That Lawyers Can Easily Avoid,» «Litigation Graphics Psychology and Color Meaning,» «The 14 Most Preventable Trial Preparation Mistakes,» «New Study: A Graphically Immersive Trial Presentation Works Best,» «Practice, Say Jury Consultants, Is Why Movie Lawyers Perform So Well,» «Three Ways to Force Yourself to Practice Your Trial Presentation,» «Explaining a Complicated Process Using Trial Graphics,» and «Litigation Graphics Timelines Can Persuade Judges and Juries.»

We are skilled and experienced trial lawyers who have the legal and technical expertise to simplify the technically complex in order to persuade judges and juries to decide in our clients» favor.

These animations are useful in court, as they can be used to persuade the judge and jury to rule against the trucking company.

While cross-examining a key witness, the lawyer uses his or her sharp wit to uncover the «truth» and theatrically persuades the judge and jury that the client's version of the facts is the right one.

Not exact matches

Most judges and juries are not persuaded by neurobiological evidence used to argue that a defendant was not fully responsible for his or her actions, as in Gunther's case, the analysis found.

Subsequent to obtaining the jury verdict, Mr. Rich and Ms. Elovecky persuaded a federal judge to bar the defendants from repeating false facts in the future.

He is persuaded by the strongly worded dissent of Judge Rader, who calls the prior art that forms the basis of the majority opinion — including a Marilyn Monroe card with a diamond attached and a piece of a sheet supposedly slept on by John Lennon — «wholly irrelevant» and expresses his opinion that the inventor was entitled to have a jury hear his infringement claims.

Most issues can be resolved either by counsel persuading the judge to leave the questions unasked, or by agreeing that counsel, who has forgotten to ask the question, may do so when the jury and the witness return.»

He has broad experience litigating challenges to financial statements and audit opinions and a demonstrated ability to distill complex accounting issues into themes and arguments that can persuade a judge or jury.

Great results are largely dependent upon a lawyer's ability to develop and communicate a compelling, easily understandable and credible story that will persuade the audience, whether it be a judge, jury or panel of academia members.

Criminal lawyers must have excellent oral and written advocacy skills in order to argue a client's case before a judge and persuade a jury.

Shaw and Porter's study also provides further evidence of the inaccuracy and malleability of human memory, evidence that is already compelling enough to have persuaded the state supreme courts of New Jersey and Massachusetts to mandate that judges instruct juries that eyewitness testimony is inherently unreliable.

He turned to civil litigation, and his legal scholarship, ferocious preparation and succinct argument impressed judges and persuaded juries.

Criminal lawyers must have excellent oral and written advocacy skills in order to argue a client's case before a judge and persuade a jury.