The petitioner appealed a judgment entered by the lower - level superior court to dismiss her unsworn notice of claim to file a medical malpractice lawsuit, pursuant to the Main Health Security Act, as a properly - sworn claim was not filed within the statute of limitations.
Not exact matches
However, Counsel to the
petitioner, Inibehe Effiong, described the ruling as a miscarriage of justice and vowed to
appeal after a careful study of the particulars of the
judgment.
The state Supreme Court ruled the
petitioners did lack the standing to challenge the CSP, but it reversed the
judgment of the Court of
Appeals, saying it violates Article IX, Section 7 of the state Constitution.
Based on a jury verdict for respondent, that court entered
judgment against
petitioner for $ 100,000, and, after review in both the Florida District Court of
Appeal and the Supreme Court of Florida, the
judgment was ultimately affirmed.
Looking at the
judgment in the
appeal case, it is quite clear what the Court wanted to convey to the Parliament: you can not disregard a citizen's petition in such a way that you either refuse to consider it completely or you provide such an insufficient reasoning that the
petitioner has no clue on the reasons for the rejection.
Upon the hearing, the
petitioner was remanded to the military custody, but, upon his prayer, an
appeal was allowed him to this court, and upon filing the usual
appeal bond, for costs, he was admitted to bail upon recognizance, with sureties conditioned for his future appearance in the Circuit Court, to abide by and perform the final
judgment of this court.