Sentences with phrase «petitions granted review»
As evidence of this, Lazarus points to numbers showing that 44 percent of the nongovernmental petitions granted review last term were filed by these veteran advocates, as opposed to six percent in 1980.
http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/ Not exact matches
But Acton, who supports the APS petition, calls the granting of the GE Hitachi licence «a tremendous failure of process», adding that the NRC review was limited to the technical aspects of the proposal.
The court unanimously granted CCSA's Petition for Review on April 17, 2013, and heard oral argument on February 4, 2015.
In response to a petition for review, the Secretary may grant the requested relief in whole or in part; or may order other relief as justice may require (including the immediate assignment of the case to the Office of Hearings for a formal hearing on the record.
After a careful technical review of the petition and the issues raised by the petitioner, the agency has decided to grant the petition because there is sufficient evidence to indicate that a larger lane width is needed for testing of long wheelbase truck tractors.
That's the question the Sierra Club will pose to the Commission if grants the petition and requires DVP to submit its Atlantic Coast agreement for review.
If the Commission grants Sierra Club's petition, DVP will have to submit its agreement with Atlantic Coast to the Commission for formal review and approval.
If the Supreme Court thinks the decision is worth reviewing, it will grant the petition and put the case on its docket.
He mentions that unlike most of the Supreme Court justices, he does not participate in the cert pool, where clerks review petitions and recommend to the court whether they should be granted.
On December 14, the Court granted Indiana - based food producer TC Heartland's petition to review a Federal Circuit decision denying a mandamus request for transfer of venue in a patent infringement suit filed in Delaware by Kraft Foods.
A petition for Post-Grant Review may be requested within nine months after the grant or reissue of a first - inventor - to - file patent.
The ultimate outcome of this issue will depend either on further review by the Supreme Court, if a petition for review is presented and granted, or on the outcome of the USPTO's promulgation of proposed regulations.
More than two months ago, the Supreme Court of the United States granted Samsung's petition for writ of certiorari (request for top - court review) regarding design patent damages, which was supported by Google, Facebook and other tech giants.
The three decisions designated as informative illustrate the Board's practices in declining to grant petitions to institute inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 325 (d) when a petition relies on grounds already considered by the examiner.
The USPTO justifies redundancy - based denials as an exercise of the agency's broad discretion whether to grant AIA review petitions.
The unexpected popularity of AIA post grant proceedings has resulted in a surprisingly high volume of petitions seeking review.
Co., 129 Cal.App.4 th 89 (2005); Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., 166 Cal.App.4 th 1497 (2008); Hughes v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company, 196 Cal.App.4 th 754 (2011)(petition for review granted on Sept. 28, 2011 and review dismissed on Sept. 11, 2013); Johnson v. Wal - Mart Stores, Inc., 544 F. App» x 696, 698 (9th Cir.
The petition for review is GRANTED.
John Muir Health petitioned for review, and the Supreme Court granted review.
The Patent Office promises that the whole Post Grant Review process will take no more than one year (after first taking no more than 3 months to decide whether to approve the Petition and commence the process).
The Court granted certiorari to review whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of determining the patentability of some, but not all, claims challenged in a petition for inter partes review violates the America Invents Act.
The US Supreme Court granted our petition and will review the Fifth Circuit's costly and erroneous decision upholding the designation of our client's uninhabitable land as «critical habitat» of the dusky gopher frog.
Yes, a patent owner may file a preliminary response to a post grant review petition to provide reasons why no post grant review should be instituted.
In a petition for a post grant review, the petitioner must by statute (i) identify all real parties in interest; (ii) identify all claims challenged and all grounds on which the challenge to each claim is based; and (iii) provide copies of evidence relied upon.
A petitioner may supplement information provided in the petition for post grant review by a motion within one month of the date trial is instituted.
In explaining why it declined to grant review, the Sixth Circuit noted that the defendant «has not identified any novel legal question raised by the petition,» and that the defendant's «mere «general assertion [s]» that certification is dispositive of the litigation» were insufficient.
This provision allows anyone threatened with infringement suits over certain types of patents to petition the patent office to review the patent's grant and scope.
Known as the transitional program for covered business method patents, or Section 18, this provision allows anyone threatened with infringement suits over certain types of patents to petition the PTO to review the patent's grant and scope.
Four of our five petitions for reexamination have been granted, and EFF expects the last will be after the PTO has had an opportunity to review it (it was filed last week).
On November 7, 2014, EFF filed an amicus brief on behalf of many computer scientists that asked the Supreme Court to grant Google's petition for review, reverse the Federal Circuit, and reinstate Judge Alsup's opinion.
If no answer is forthcoming, your divorce petition will be reviewed in court and, ultimately, granted by default along with its legal provisions for the division of assets, child custody and support payments.