Not exact matches
Phaseouts are structured in different ways and thus have different
effects.
City officials achieved an almost complete
phaseout of ozone - depleting hydrochlorofluorocarbons, gases also known to contribute to the global greenhouse
effect.
In addition, taxes are more than just marginal tax rates — you need to consider the
phaseout of exemptions, deductions, and credits when calculating the
effect of taxes.
What I am saying is that it makes no sense at all to hand - wave at the
effects of uncontrolled volcanic eruptions as «absolute proof» that geoengineering schemes «can work», while promoting a gradual 50 - year
phaseout of GHG emissions (which is too slow to have any hope of preventing catastrophic outcomes) as «logical» (whatever that means) and ignoring the multiple studies that show we can easily phase out emissions in a fraction of that time with the proven technologies that are already at hand.