Conversely, in the absence of answers to these questions, the work is destined to languish as one more purely statistical /
phenomenological climate model that can not readily be distinguished from hundreds of such climate models already in the literature.
One time series doesn't prove much, but this is of course part of a much larger archive of
phenomenological climate - related data that I've talked about before.
Thus, our conclusion was that
the phenomenological climate transfer sensitivity to the 11 - year solar cycle is likely given by Z11y = 0.11 + / - 0.02 K / W / m ^ 2.
Not exact matches
Thus, there are sufficient studies, both theoretical and
phenomenological, confirming our results that for slower variations the
climate sensitivity is stronger.
There are two possibilities: 1) using a
climate model, this implies a perfect knowledge of all involved climatic mechanisms, and nobody has such a knowledge yet; 2) use a simpler
phenomenological approach.
Total Solar Irradiance Satellite Composites and their
Phenomenological Effect on
Climate.
VS says here that
climate models are
phenomenological, Richard Lindzen says as much.
As for
climate models, here's a definition from wikipedia of the word
phenomenological as related to science: