ISLAND EXPERIENCE is an intimate exploration of kinks and fetishes by an unlikely couple, with thoughtful and
philosophical discussion by the characters, and graphic descriptions of their erotic adventures.
WEEKEND EXPERIENCE is an intimate exploration of kinks and fetishes by an unlikely couple, with thoughtful and
philosophical discussion by the characters, -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
All these assertions are an offense, which will not be removed
by philosophical discussion, but only
by faith and obedience.
By analyzing the Marxist system, he offered the
philosophical basis for his cautionary stance toward liberation theology - a position prefigured in his
discussion of alienation in Anthropology in 7heological Perspective (Westminster, 1985).
The broader purpose of Ashcraft's study is to demonstrate
by example the virtue of taking political and religious ideology out of the realm of abstract
philosophical discussion and considering it «in relation to a socially defined audience whose members seek to obtain certain practical advantages through social action.
R. G. Collingwood, in his well - known book, The Idea of Nature, develops the thesis that the idea of nature in
philosophical discussion has always been conditioned
by historical preoccupations and circumstances.1 We can not hope to isolate nature from our historicity so as to describe clearly and distinctly what it is «in itself.»
Fourth, as used in most evangelical
discussion, the term is a
philosophical judgment controlled
by categories alien to Scripture; it is a slogan based on «how God ought to have inspired the Word» which has been substituted for careful patient analysis of what the Bible does teach about itself.
Before proceeding to the
discussion, it is necessary to clarify what is meant
by «metaphysics», given the opinion in many
philosophical circles that such an endeavour is neither possible nor even desirable.
Since 1950,
philosophical discussions of Whitehead's view of God have been influenced primarily
by Charles Hartshorne and William Christian.50 Hartshorne has continued to develop and apply the doctrines of panpsychism and panentheism explained in Part One.
In the
discussion that follows, one work
by each writer is assumed to embody his respective position: Blackmur's Form and Value in Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and
Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of Ideas (AI).
His therapy begins
by identifying the problem, coaxing the vague, often unarticulated suspicion of religious belief into the form of a direct
philosophical or theological claim, setting the stage for a vigorous
discussion.
It arises out of
philosophical necessity and is only slightly affected, as in the
discussion of peace,
by special religious insight or need.
(For a comprehensive
discussion of the use of alcohol as a religious substitute, see «
Philosophical - Religious Factors in the Etiology and Treatment of Alcoholism,»
by H. J. Clinebell, Jr., Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Fall, 1965).
By analogy, it should be relatively obvious that there is no fundamental
philosophical impossibility in having broad social and political
discussions with children, without implicating them in one's own party political persuasion or rubbishing all opponents.
The opening shot, showing Alexander and his son planting a tree followed
by a long
philosophical discussion deliberately and intelligently clashes with the more frantic, more meaningless closing shot.
- Usable in virtually any subject after customisation - Perfect for starting
philosophical debates and
discussions Designed and used
by an experienced P4C instructor and organiser of debating societies.
But below the surface appearance was a dramatically heightened awareness of student learning — nurtured
by the planning sessions, research reviews,
philosophical discussions, and development of the improvement plan.
This is a step -
by - step training manual and a
philosophical discussion of the spiritual benefits of owning a dog.
Each event will comprise of a panel
discussion followed
by a two - hour seminar allowing a closer look at the
philosophical texts and arguments in play.
In this most recent version of This Situation at IMMA, the gallery is occupied
by a group of six «participants» or «interpreters» whose choreographed actions generate a
discussion of cultural, economic and
philosophical issues.
It's a short and quite readable piece that offers five potential indicators and links to several enlightening examples, but for a more
philosophical dive, you can turn to «Comparability of Effort in International Climate Policy Architecture ``, a
discussion paper published at the very beginning of the year
by Joseph Aldy of Harvard and William Pizer of Duke in January.
I'm not saying that the authors of TEEB believe that, there's every indication that they believe exactly the opposite, but nevertheless
by framing the
discussion in financial terms potentially just reinforces the
philosophical and psychological frameworks that have led to so much destruction of people, animals and environment in the first place.
It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «
philosophical arguments» or
discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong
by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
Wotts — It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «
philosophical arguments» or
discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong
by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
Since
philosophical cohesion is a prerequisite to effectuating a structure
by which partners will agree to be bound, great care must be taken to: (1) determine what the partners want lawyer management to be / not to be, i.e., strong leadership, consensus builders, visionaries, functional managers, etc.; and (2) engage in extensive
discussion about the partners» respective expectations for individual involvement in decision - making in defined areas, paying particular attention to those areas likely to challenge the natural independence of lawyers who have already successfully achieved partnership.
[2] An illuminating
discussion of several
philosophical questions presented
by the doctrine of contributory negligence is offered in K Simons, «The Puzzling Doctrine of Contributory Negligence» (1995) 16 Cardozo Law Review 1693.