Sentences with phrase «philosophical discussion by»

ISLAND EXPERIENCE is an intimate exploration of kinks and fetishes by an unlikely couple, with thoughtful and philosophical discussion by the characters, and graphic descriptions of their erotic adventures.
WEEKEND EXPERIENCE is an intimate exploration of kinks and fetishes by an unlikely couple, with thoughtful and philosophical discussion by the characters, -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

All these assertions are an offense, which will not be removed by philosophical discussion, but only by faith and obedience.
By analyzing the Marxist system, he offered the philosophical basis for his cautionary stance toward liberation theology - a position prefigured in his discussion of alienation in Anthropology in 7heological Perspective (Westminster, 1985).
The broader purpose of Ashcraft's study is to demonstrate by example the virtue of taking political and religious ideology out of the realm of abstract philosophical discussion and considering it «in relation to a socially defined audience whose members seek to obtain certain practical advantages through social action.
R. G. Collingwood, in his well - known book, The Idea of Nature, develops the thesis that the idea of nature in philosophical discussion has always been conditioned by historical preoccupations and circumstances.1 We can not hope to isolate nature from our historicity so as to describe clearly and distinctly what it is «in itself.»
Fourth, as used in most evangelical discussion, the term is a philosophical judgment controlled by categories alien to Scripture; it is a slogan based on «how God ought to have inspired the Word» which has been substituted for careful patient analysis of what the Bible does teach about itself.
Before proceeding to the discussion, it is necessary to clarify what is meant by «metaphysics», given the opinion in many philosophical circles that such an endeavour is neither possible nor even desirable.
Since 1950, philosophical discussions of Whitehead's view of God have been influenced primarily by Charles Hartshorne and William Christian.50 Hartshorne has continued to develop and apply the doctrines of panpsychism and panentheism explained in Part One.
In the discussion that follows, one work by each writer is assumed to embody his respective position: Blackmur's Form and Value in Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of Ideas (AI).
His therapy begins by identifying the problem, coaxing the vague, often unarticulated suspicion of religious belief into the form of a direct philosophical or theological claim, setting the stage for a vigorous discussion.
It arises out of philosophical necessity and is only slightly affected, as in the discussion of peace, by special religious insight or need.
(For a comprehensive discussion of the use of alcohol as a religious substitute, see «Philosophical - Religious Factors in the Etiology and Treatment of Alcoholism,» by H. J. Clinebell, Jr., Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Fall, 1965).
By analogy, it should be relatively obvious that there is no fundamental philosophical impossibility in having broad social and political discussions with children, without implicating them in one's own party political persuasion or rubbishing all opponents.
The opening shot, showing Alexander and his son planting a tree followed by a long philosophical discussion deliberately and intelligently clashes with the more frantic, more meaningless closing shot.
- Usable in virtually any subject after customisation - Perfect for starting philosophical debates and discussions Designed and used by an experienced P4C instructor and organiser of debating societies.
But below the surface appearance was a dramatically heightened awareness of student learning — nurtured by the planning sessions, research reviews, philosophical discussions, and development of the improvement plan.
This is a step - by - step training manual and a philosophical discussion of the spiritual benefits of owning a dog.
Each event will comprise of a panel discussion followed by a two - hour seminar allowing a closer look at the philosophical texts and arguments in play.
In this most recent version of This Situation at IMMA, the gallery is occupied by a group of six «participants» or «interpreters» whose choreographed actions generate a discussion of cultural, economic and philosophical issues.
It's a short and quite readable piece that offers five potential indicators and links to several enlightening examples, but for a more philosophical dive, you can turn to «Comparability of Effort in International Climate Policy Architecture ``, a discussion paper published at the very beginning of the year by Joseph Aldy of Harvard and William Pizer of Duke in January.
I'm not saying that the authors of TEEB believe that, there's every indication that they believe exactly the opposite, but nevertheless by framing the discussion in financial terms potentially just reinforces the philosophical and psychological frameworks that have led to so much destruction of people, animals and environment in the first place.
It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
Wotts — It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).
Since philosophical cohesion is a prerequisite to effectuating a structure by which partners will agree to be bound, great care must be taken to: (1) determine what the partners want lawyer management to be / not to be, i.e., strong leadership, consensus builders, visionaries, functional managers, etc.; and (2) engage in extensive discussion about the partners» respective expectations for individual involvement in decision - making in defined areas, paying particular attention to those areas likely to challenge the natural independence of lawyers who have already successfully achieved partnership.
[2] An illuminating discussion of several philosophical questions presented by the doctrine of contributory negligence is offered in K Simons, «The Puzzling Doctrine of Contributory Negligence» (1995) 16 Cardozo Law Review 1693.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z