Sentences with phrase «philosophical discussion does»

On the other hand, a kind of philosophical discussion does go on among physicists themselves.

Or, to put the matter more accurately, to engage in philosophical discussion they did not assume a traditional philosophical starting point.

Not exact matches

While the general topic of lex talionis is always a fun philosophical discussion, I don't think it applies to what is going on in Israel right now.

An unsettling question, but this way of posing it does keep it at arm's length, a subject for theological or philosophical or medical discussion.

Fourth, as used in most evangelical discussion, the term is a philosophical judgment controlled by categories alien to Scripture; it is a slogan based on «how God ought to have inspired the Word» which has been substituted for careful patient analysis of what the Bible does teach about itself.

True, the historic creeds — Apostles» and Nicene — are presupposed in all our discussions, but there is profound significance in the fact that when a modern ecumenical conference goes in search of a conception which will set forth the essential content of historic Christianity, it does not expect to find it in a philosophical speculation about God, but in a revelation of his character and his disposition toward man.

Lawyers and judges do not (and should not) engage in philosophical discussions about what they (in their individual consciences) consider to be morally right.

Hicks writes: «Lawyers and judges do not (and should not) engage in philosophical discussions about what they (in their individual consciences) consider to be morally right.»

Nevertheless, the tendency to carry on philosophical discussion as if his ideas and arguments did not exist has been noteworthy.

This is a movie review, however, and not a philosophical discussion, so let's do a little reviewing, shall we?

But starting off a philosophical discussion with «Picture Dustin Hoffman holding a blanket...» doesn't give much validity to your following statements.

They take part in an interactive starter, watch a PowerPoint about harvest, do a drama activity and a written activity, finishing with a philosophical discussion.

Although the author writes from a strongly Christian point of view, the book isn't a sermon on the evils of torture, nor does it delve into philosophical discussion.

It's ready - made for book club or classroom discussions, and it's guaranteed to provide (forgive me) food for thought long after you have finished reading... Nothing delves deep into philosophical territory in a way that few modern fiction novels (especially YA novels) do.

Rhetorical questions can be quite powerful in political speeches or philosophical debates, but don't work so well in scientific discussions.

And really, «philosophical» discussion such as this does not begin to convey the depth and breadth of Objectivism.

I won't get into a philosophical discussion of whether we are actually happier or have better or worse values, but I do think we're spoiled, pampered, and live in fear of losing any little thing, because we seemingly have everything — cheap.

It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).

Wotts — It was just a comment and it does seem that much of the debate about this topic revolves around «philosophical arguments» or discussions that appear rather pedantic about some terminology, rather than actually discussing the science (not that philosophy and terminology aren't relevant, just that you don't prove that some science is wrong by simply quoting Popper — not that you did this though).