«One of the fascinating stories that come out of these letters is of a struggle to contain what was certainly a very intense relationship which mixed emotions and
philosophical ideas in proper Christian boundaries.»
I shall be as explicit as possible about the presuppositions concerning how we know what we know, and the general
philosophical ideas in relation to which this interpretation of the Christian faith is developed.
Not exact matches
He finds himself
in his own flow state when he attempts to verbally communicate a large, mind - bending
philosophical idea.
«It» has an impact, but its impact is deterministic, it had no «choice»
in the matter, it was just executing along determistically (Determinism is the
philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision and action, is the inevitable and necessary consequence of antecedent states of affairs.
In medieval philosophical texts one idea often given as an example of impossibility was the «rose in the winter.&raqu
In medieval
philosophical texts one
idea often given as an example of impossibility was the «rose
in the winter.&raqu
in the winter.»
In short, the irreducible complexity of molecular systems is controversial among molecular biologists when it is presented as an idea with philosophical consequences, and tacitly accepted as reality when it remains in the world of innocent fac
In short, the irreducible complexity of molecular systems is controversial among molecular biologists when it is presented as an
idea with
philosophical consequences, and tacitly accepted as reality when it remains
in the world of innocent fac
in the world of innocent fact.
His warning
in Science and the Modern World that metaphysics could not go far toward presenting an
idea of God available for religion is less obviously relevant to the later formulations of the
philosophical doctrine.
In this volume, I am not undertaking to criticize
philosophical ideas philosophically.
It is notorious that the ineradicable
ideas left
in Descartes's mind after he had doubted everything were products of the
philosophical and theological work, or more broadly of the cultural matrix, that had formed his mind.
«30 But no earlier than
in Whitehead's Adventures of
Ideas does the
philosophical relevance of revelation - theological content assume reflexive shape.31
«2 Therefore, philosophy of religion must balance itself between the extremes of a philosophy that cuts itself off from religious experience and a religious stance that segregates itself from
philosophical reflection.3 The search for a philosophy of religion is a search for total world - view
in which the
idea of God encountered
in human history is thoroughly integrated.
Whatever roles
philosophical and theological
ideas played
in the debates over heliocentrism, biological evolution, and the Big Bang theory, the scientific issues were eventually settled by more and better data and by considerations that were purely «scientific»
in the modern sense.
There is also continuity
in the correspondence between the qualifiers used for God in both [D] and [E]: «unmoved mover» in 342.17 -LRB-[El) recovers, in a formulation that is peculiar to some philosophical systems, the general idea of staticity in God (346.38, in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in the correspondence between the qualifiers used for God
in both [D] and [E]: «unmoved mover» in 342.17 -LRB-[El) recovers, in a formulation that is peculiar to some philosophical systems, the general idea of staticity in God (346.38, in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in both [D] and [E]: «unmoved mover»
in 342.17 -LRB-[El) recovers, in a formulation that is peculiar to some philosophical systems, the general idea of staticity in God (346.38, in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in 342.17 -LRB-[El) recovers,
in a formulation that is peculiar to some philosophical systems, the general idea of staticity in God (346.38, in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in a formulation that is peculiar to some
philosophical systems, the general
idea of staticity
in God (346.38, in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in God (346.38,
in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19, in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in [D]-RRB-, whereas «eminently real» (342.18 - 19,
in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38, In [D]-RRB
in [E]-RRB- is identical to «eminent reality» (346.38,
In [D]-RRB
In [D]-RRB-.
A fact may be defined as something that occurred
in reality, but at the solipsist state you can't talk of any reality beyond your own conscience, so the way you made yourself ready to dismiss solipsism as a
philosophical idea, not a fact, simply doesn't make any sense.
But now we're talking not about the belief
in a god, but the ramifications or theology or
philosophical dealing with that
idea.
On a more practical level, there is the problem of actually putting
philosophical ideas to work
in the classroom.
In the extensive secondary literature on Weil, her religious
ideas are frequently treated with little understanding of their
philosophical, theological, moral and social - political bearing.
John wishes to emphasize that the Word of God had «descended» from the realm of the Spirit and had become no longer a mental image, no longer a
philosophical idea, but a human being
in history.
He believed that «the true method of
philosophical construction is to frame a scheme of
ideas, the best that one can, and unflinchingly to explore the interpretation of experience
in terms of that scheme» (PR xiv / x).
Radical
ideas are rather presented
in poetry,
philosophical parables, sufi - metaphysical
ideas and so on; for these modes of communication were safer for the writers.
Gods will is for us humans today to evolved to a level of conciousness that will prepare us for the challenges of our future survival, Scientists now predicts of hardships
in the future due to over population and changes to the natural environment.and that is happening now with activists through out the world are reminding us of protecting nature.That is why we need a phsychological revolution to hasten the evolution of consciousness that will address the problems.Ideological and
philosophical enlightenment had the past great minds to develop
ideas and belief because God sent them to reality
in their times.Abraham, Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, and many other religious leaders to teach humanity the doctrines that God willed to be appropriate and applicable
in those periods of their existence, Also great philosophers
in another dimension of social involvement were born to interprete and connect philosophically as the second element of our conscience, Kant, Marx and countless of them also were born.To complete the triangular structure or dimension of our conscience is knowledge.
This comes out clearly
in one of his latest statements about the therapeutic» function of philosophy as applied to social issues: «helping people get out from under outdated
philosophical ideas, helping break the crust of convention.»
The past forty years have brought a recovery of the
idea of just war
in Christian ethical discourse, and this has invigorated a larger engagement with the just war
idea in policy debate,
in the military sphere,
in philosophical thought, and
in dialogue between moral reflection and international law.
His
ideas and proposals can be recommended on their merits also to those who are not interested
in their
philosophical sources.
R. G. Collingwood,
in his well - known book, The
Idea of Nature, develops the thesis that the idea of nature in philosophical discussion has always been conditioned by historical preoccupations and circumstances.1 We can not hope to isolate nature from our historicity so as to describe clearly and distinctly what it is «in itself.&ra
Idea of Nature, develops the thesis that the
idea of nature in philosophical discussion has always been conditioned by historical preoccupations and circumstances.1 We can not hope to isolate nature from our historicity so as to describe clearly and distinctly what it is «in itself.&ra
idea of nature
in philosophical discussion has always been conditioned by historical preoccupations and circumstances.1 We can not hope to isolate nature from our historicity so as to describe clearly and distinctly what it is «
in itself.»
The first results of these metaphysical inquiries can be found
in the five books of the manuscript «Notes towards a Metaphysic» (written from September 1933 till May 1934),
in which he makes an endeavor to construct a cosmological - metaphysical system of his own, 5 following the example of Whitehead's and Alexander's description of reality as a process, but based on his method elaborated
in An Essay on
Philosophical Method, 6 and
in «Sketch of a Cosmological Theory,» the first (never published) cosmology conclusion to The
Idea of Nature.
I regard this preparation as now complete...
in order to develop the
philosophical ideas to which they have led me.
He finds all
philosophical ideas of God resistant to the Biblical understanding of a God who acts selectively
in history.
The real distinction between some
philosophical ideas, which are nonbiblical
in their implications, and the scriptural picture is exactly what I urged above: that between history read
in terms of nature and nature read
in terms of history.
In addition to its classic and
philosophical expressions, the
idea of freedom through understanding runs as a leitmotif through the whole history of modern science and humanism.
Many scholars have suggested that there are two distinct phases
in Marx's writings: early Marx, which includes at least the rather humanistic
ideas of the Economic and
Philosophical Manuscripts (1844) and The Communist Manifesto (1848); and later Marx which has the much more technical and «scientific» economics of Das Capital, the first volume of which was published
in 1867.
In every age, people naturally form World Pictures that are syntheses of
ideas derived from various sources - prevailing scientific theories,
philosophical speculation, revealed truth, widely accepted notions, and «common sense».
His
idea of a «new synthesis», proposed mainly
in his book Catholicism: A New Synthesis and developed
in his many theological and
philosophical essays, was an attempt to grapple precisely with the issues we have spoken of: the post-Cartesian «turn to the subject» (that is: the loss of faith
in the objectivity of knowledge and the subsequent exclusive concern of philosophy with the self and the subjective
idea as the norm of «truth») and the philosophy of evolution with its implications for a dynamic rather than a static universe.
I'm an atheist when it comes to Christianity, but that doesn't mean I don't understand the golden rule or other
ideas presented by Jesus as a human philosopher, but even if I agreed with Jesus on a number of
philosophical issues,
in no way would I be a Christian.
But these men are important historically
in a third way: not only their results and their methods but the
philosophical interpretations of their
ideas had a major impact on Western thought.
So,
in short, this «evidence» that proves Christianity isn't so much scientific evidence as it is idealistic /
philosophical / rhetorical resonance that may or may not occur when an individual encounters the Christian
idea of Jesus and the death / resurrection story.
The intellectual roots of terrorism lie
in three
philosophical ideas which, ironically, are peculiarly Western: popular sovereignty, self - determination and ethical consequentialism.
What is striking is that reflection coming out of life experience and Biblical study
in communities that have taken for granted the reality of God converge so far with the
ideas of God that come from those who have wrestled with, and proposed alternatives to, the dominant
philosophical views.
There were
philosophical debates among Greek philosophers as to exactly what this word means, but common to their usage was the
idea expressed
in the adage, «two substances can not occupy the same space at the same time.»
Cardinal Schönborn had criticized the broader thrust of «neo-Darwinian dogma», and
in his first catechetical lecture has given examples of the misapplying of scientific
ideas to make atheistic
philosophical inferences.
Humboldt as an empiricist, psychologist, and historian was ever attracted by the riddle of individuality, while his
philosophical interest forced him to seek the
idea or norm
in which reality appears idealized.
The direct evidence consists of what Whitehead himself tells us, first, about how his books are meant to be read and understood, about the genesis of his
ideas, and about modifications
in his views; and second, about the nature of his thinking, about his difficulties
in translating his thoughts into words, about the sources of his
philosophical terminology, and about the peculiar manner
in which he composed his books.
Thus, waxing
philosophical, he agrees that «power» is a relational concept and yet at the same time he considers it to be a simple
idea, one that can not be «divided» further, being but one uniform appearance or conception of the mind — it is received by observing both
in ourselves and
in natural bodies an ability to produce various effects.
In the discussion that follows, one work by each writer is assumed to embody his respective position: Blackmur's Form and Value in Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of Ideas (AI
In the discussion that follows, one work by each writer is assumed to embody his respective position: Blackmur's Form and Value
in Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of Ideas (AI
in Modern Poetry (FVMP), Sartre's Literary and
Philosophical Essays (LPE), Brooks's The Well - Wrought Urn (WWU), and Whitehead's Adventures of
Ideas (AI).
In three epochs science has suggested
philosophical ideas: the Greek period, the seventeenth century, and the twentieth century.
Also,
in a letter to Mark Barr concerning the possibility of being offered a post at Harvard, Whitehead says the post would be very attractive because it would provide him the opportunity of developing
in systematic form his «
ideas on Logic, the Philosophy of Science, Metaphysics, and some more general questions, half
philosophical and half practical, such as Education» (ANW - 2 134).
In the last ten years of his life, Wach was often mistakenly thought to be in the camp of the second approach to comparative religion at Chicago, which necessitated his stating repeatedly that while the philosophy of religion applies an abstract philosophical idea of what religion is to the data of empirical, historical studies, the history of religions begins with the investigation of religious phenomena, from which, it is hoped, a pattern of «meaning» will emerg
In the last ten years of his life, Wach was often mistakenly thought to be
in the camp of the second approach to comparative religion at Chicago, which necessitated his stating repeatedly that while the philosophy of religion applies an abstract philosophical idea of what religion is to the data of empirical, historical studies, the history of religions begins with the investigation of religious phenomena, from which, it is hoped, a pattern of «meaning» will emerg
in the camp of the second approach to comparative religion at Chicago, which necessitated his stating repeatedly that while the philosophy of religion applies an abstract
philosophical idea of what religion is to the data of empirical, historical studies, the history of religions begins with the investigation of religious phenomena, from which, it is hoped, a pattern of «meaning» will emerge.
If we take the
idea of query seriously, then the merit of a
philosophical system rests
in its capacity to promote query, not
in its completion as defined by its author.
[4] Atheism
in general doesn't give us the
philosophical tools to sort out when a greater loss is worth the price of ending the suffering of others — and
in fact it can create dilemmas like the problem of what to do with children who are being indoctrinated by their parents into
ideas we do not agree with.
Charles Hartshorne has written extensively about the merits of this
philosophical position, and a loose adaptation of his
ideas on its advantages may be set forth
in the following short list: 17