Sentences with phrase «philosophical questions for»

Philosophical questions for another time.
As to loss avoidance vs opportunity cost, it's a philosophical question for you that will shape your entire investing strategy.

Not exact matches

In the discussion portion, a group of candidates — the number can vary — for a particular role are gathered in a room and presented with a question that can lean toward the philosophical («Should prisons be privatized?»)
(Barron's) • In Search of the Perfect Recession Indicator (Philosophical Economics) • A Fireside Chat With Charlie Munger (MoneyBeat) • Complexity theory and financial regulation (Science) • Five Pieces of Conventional Wisdom That Make Smart Investors Look Dumb (CFA Institute) • This Lawyer Is Hollywood's Complete Divorce Solution (Bloomberg) • Curiosity update, sols 1218 - 1249: Digging in the sand at Mar's Bagnold Dunes (Planetary Society) • The Plot to Take Down a Fox News Analyst (NYT) • Ask the aged: Who better to answer questions about the purpose of life than someone who has been living theirs for a long time?
Bernard Coughlin, S.J., title this collection of essays «Letters to Young People,» because it would inform and challenge college - aged students who are grappling with philosophical, spiritual, political, and ethical questions for the first time.
Here lies the basis in Whitehead's thought for the relation of philosophical theology to questions of values and ethics — and, therefore, of religion to politics.
In his fair and generally sympathetic review of my book Bergson and Modern Physics, David Sipfle raised some important and significant questions which clearly show how extremely complex the questions concerning the nature of time are and how difficult it is to agree on their solutions even for those who share a basic philosophical view.
He connects sexual activity to increasing doubts among young adults, and suggests that when twenty - somethings come home from college with scientific or philosophical questions related to their faith, those questions are just a guise for what's really at work — they're having sex.
An unsettling question, but this way of posing it does keep it at arm's length, a subject for theological or philosophical or medical discussion.
I stated my position on many of the philosophical problems to which my teachers had introduced me, for instance the question of internal and external relations; and I gave arguments for the positions.
And where custom dictates that for the sake of convenience we keep to the traditional academic structure, the philosophical question still remains as to whether biology (or psychology or any other human science) has a genuine right to autonomous existence.
I don't think Owen succeeds in showing that politics needs philosophical foundation, though his hook is an excellent resource for engaging that difficult and important question.
The probable answer is that in these lectures he was addressing an audience of modernist liberal rationalists, and wanted to persuade them that even their own philosophical system had to concede at least some room for nonrational opinions on public questions, and therefore for religious opinion.
It is the weaknesses endemic to narrative that may cause some to question its sufficiency: the rejection of the philosophical supports needed to sustain Christian truth, an emphasis on divine agency entailing a disdain for apologetics, and a turn to intratextual (rather than correspondence) theories of truth.
These questions get to the heart of a philosophical problem posed by Intelligent Design: It supposes that natural law, which is the basis for science, operates most of the time but is periodically suspended, as in the Cambrian «explosion» and the origin of life itself.
The condition requisite for healing it always this about - face, and from a purely philosophical point of view it might be a subtle question whether it is possible for one to be in despair with full consciousness of what it is about which one despairs.)
Wittgenstein countered Descartes» dualism, after all, by observing that the philosophical question he was most famous for — how do I know that I am?
Although there are various articles and books showing what I have called systematic theological concerns, philosophical criteria are used, usually exclusively, when dealing with questions of meaning and truth, criteria which are respectable in the academy.3 Process Christology, for example, usually follows Schleiermacher, and tends as a result to be embarrassed by strong exclusivist claims.
But on the whole, nineteenth century philosophical theology was not particularly interested in the question of original or corporate sin; it was far more involved in various responses to Hegel, the new prominence of biblical study and its corollary «quest for the historical Jesus,» and the implications of economic and psychological developments for Christian faith.
For the philosophical question as to how the making of a sign can impose a moral obligation see G.E.M.Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers Vol.3, Blackwell 1981 pp. 1philosophical question as to how the making of a sign can impose a moral obligation see G.E.M.Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers Vol.3, Blackwell 1981 pp. 1Philosophical Papers Vol.3, Blackwell 1981 pp. 10 21, 97 103.
2) You can maintain your position from a faith perspective, and say this, but then I'd have to seriously question [a] your historical integrity (for example, the historical position of Revelations as canon, although more of a debate than the other texts, was still NOWHERE NEAR contestable enough for you to draw this sort of conclusion) and [b] your philosophical integrity (for example, if you dismiss Revelations because it doesn't support your position, i'm going to ask: by what authority do you think you have the right to discern this?
Don't think I'm gonna be referencing you for philosophical questions like the existence of a god, hun.
For those of a philosophical bent, this chapter looks like a Magisterial response to Martin Heidegger's 1953 essay «The Question Concerning Technology», which suggested that the modern fixation with technology has made men think falsely that they can control the mysteries of Being.
He is a witness to how science is looking for answers about the world and is having to deal with philosophical and religious questions.
Editor's Reply We would simply note that at a question and answer session with representatives of the new movements held at Pentecost Pope Francis made the following comment, which seems to dovetail with the emphasis Mr Keeffe places on devotion to the Real Presence: For us Christians, poverty is not a sociological, philosophical or cultural category.
Ricoeur there proposes a philosophical analysis of symbolic and metaphoric language intended to help us reach a «second naivete» before such texts.17 The latter phrase, which Ricoeur has made famous, suggests that the «first naivete,» an unquestioned dwelling in a world of symbol, which presumably came naturally to men and women in one - possibility cultures to which the symbols in question were indigenous, is no longer possible for us.
What is at issue theologically is the question of whether Hegelian or Whiteheadian thinking is the best philosophical vehicle for the contemporary expression of the cognitive meaning of the Christian faith.
question «may arise more from a need to find an excuse for moral shortcomings than from a genuine desire to satisfy philosophical curiosity.»
No reason at all, for I am not suggesting that there is actually a final philosophical system — e.g. idealism, and Hegelianism in particular — or that it is necessary for our exegesis to take over the actual answers that philosophy gives to the existential question of the meaning of my own particular existence.
This is not an idle question, nor just a question for those who happen to have a philosophical turn of mind.
Maybe that's on a more philosophical, food culture level, but it's sort of dizzying for chefs to watch because these trends seem to come out of nowhere, and then in the context of wastefulness, the question is: What do you do with the byproducts of those crazes?
And Ogden has other philosophical questions to ponder, some of which were thrust in his face during his trip to Las Vegas for the Tyson - Bruno fight.
I am not asserting that kind of conservatism is good or bad as a starting point for looking at policy, I am merely asking a question about how someone ascribing to this viewpoint would reconcile a potential philosophical inconsistency.
For Fitzpatrick and Gellately (1996: 766) the «problem of denunciation» rests upon «big philosophical questions of loyalty and citizenship»; of duties towards to state and responsibilities of the «good citizen» (ibid.
For example, there is probably a material answer to philosophical questions about the nature of reality.
Yet the narrative of scientific discovery is placed in the context of «real problems affecting real people, without abandoning our concern for broader social policies and fundamental philosophical questions».
Suddenly, deep philosophical questions are making headlines as commentators sound the death knell for free will.
As to whether our efforts will influence policy, that is a philosophical and political science question, and this is a web site for scientific information.]
The extent to which human - driven phenomena, including technology and culture, can affect human nature itself raises an interesting philosophical question: Should our goals for societal development include mindfulness of how Homo sapiens evolve in response?
Thanks to its Question of the Day matching system, Siren sets up the context for discussing engaging topics (like bucket list items and philosophical questions) and pairs people through those authentic and entertaining conversations.
Director George Miller returns to his post-apocalyptic series for the first time since 1985's Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, setting a new standard for action while addressing tough philosophical questions.
A thought - provoking science fiction that may feel dated today even with its good visuals but raises interesting philosophical questions about solitude, the value of life and what it is like to risk everything for a conviction - which outweighs the ecological message intended.
Now, Pfister is calling the shots himself, making his directing debut with «Transcendence» — and he seems to be aiming for the same kind of philosophical questions and existential dilemmas that «Inception» posed.
The story is disclosed in an extremely low - pace through a flawed screenplay that uses many ellipsis and poor art decoration, but beautifully raises philosophical questions about love, death, understanding, communication, fear for the unknown, origin of life, and might be the Paradise or even God.
He also kindly indulged my penchant for getting philosophical with a question about how we perceive media by musing on the generational differences in attitudes towards the bombardment with which modern live is gifted / cursed.
The opposite holds true for this philosophical, poignant and riotously funny look at the low - budget film's resurgence and a timeless question: What is the standard of «bad,» exactly?
First 3 lessons for a CRE unit, philosophical investigations, skills used in RE and thinking about the «big» questions.
Topics Include: - Christian Beliefs about God - Miracles - The Trinity - Effect of belief in God on community - Philosophical Arguments for / against - Comparisons to Buddhism - Design vs Evolution - Nature of Christian Worship - How to answer exam questions
For a FREE DEMO please search: «The Philosophical Debate Generator [Free Demo Version]» Uses: - P4C (Philosophy for kids)- Form time activities - R.S. / Philosophy / Citizenship cover lessons - Debating societies - Making best use of spare time at the end of lessons Discussions follow one of four formats, each asking students to move from one side of the room or the other to make their position clear: teachers should then use questioning to foster a debate between students, encouraging them to present reasons for their choice and defend their positiFor a FREE DEMO please search: «The Philosophical Debate Generator [Free Demo Version]» Uses: - P4C (Philosophy for kids)- Form time activities - R.S. / Philosophy / Citizenship cover lessons - Debating societies - Making best use of spare time at the end of lessons Discussions follow one of four formats, each asking students to move from one side of the room or the other to make their position clear: teachers should then use questioning to foster a debate between students, encouraging them to present reasons for their choice and defend their positifor kids)- Form time activities - R.S. / Philosophy / Citizenship cover lessons - Debating societies - Making best use of spare time at the end of lessons Discussions follow one of four formats, each asking students to move from one side of the room or the other to make their position clear: teachers should then use questioning to foster a debate between students, encouraging them to present reasons for their choice and defend their positifor their choice and defend their position.
But for the most part, the political, historical, and philosophical questions of the war have been left alone.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z