Not exact matches
In my experience, natural law is the second
most ridiculed
philosophical system and is well known to be nothing more than an attempt to inject religion into
philosophical conversation.
Whitehead once observed that there is a hidden imaginative background behind even the
most refined and abstract of
philosophical systems.
My critic does not refer to Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method, my
most philosophical book and the one coming closest to summing up my
system.
Undoubtedly the
most neglected aspect of Whitehead's copious
philosophical system is his social philosophy, in general, and his views on civilization, in particular.
The
most fundamental guidepost provided by Whitehead is also the
most explicitly and frequently stated: (1) that his books can be read independently of one another, but are meant to complement and supplement each other in giving expression to his
philosophical system.
In
most philosophical and theological
systems Being was endowed with a more dignified status of the true reality, of which the temporal realm is merely a pale, shadowy replica.
The cosmologies implied in mythic, religious and
most philosophical systems of the past have been hierarchical in nature.1 They have usually delineated four realms of cosmic being: mineral, plant, animal, man.
When you are doing «900 shows a year,» an issue Stuart Polansky addresses in a book with that same title, questions of why and other
philosophical questions get very short shrift for very practical reasons,
most of which relate to school
system structure and community value
systems.