Not exact matches
A cursory
search of that
phone incidental to the arrest revealed a text message from someone named «Simon».
[7] Accordingly, the Court found that a police officer may
search a cell -
phone incidental to an arrest where: [8]
R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77 (35298)
Searches of cell
phones incident to arrest is permitted, provided the
search (both what is
searched and how it is
searched) is strictly
incidental to the arrest and police keep detailed notes of what has been
searched and why.
Both the nature and the extent of the
search performed on the cell
phone must be truly
incidental to the particular arrest for the particular offence.
In practice, this will mean that, generally, even when a cell
phone search is permitted because it is truly
incidental to the arrest, only recently sent or drafted emails, texts, photos and the call log may be examined as in most cases only those sorts of items will have the necessary link to the purposes for which prompt examination of the device is permitted.
In other words, it is not enough that a cell
phone search in general terms is truly
incidental to the arrest.
The first is to hold that the power to
search incident to arrest generally includes the power to
search cell
phones, provided that the
search is truly
incidental to the arrest: R. v. Giles, 2007 BCSC 1147 (CanLII); R. v. Otchere - Badu, 2010 ONSC 1059 (CanLII); Young v. Canada, 2010 CanLII 74003 (NL PC), 2010 CanLII 74003 (Nfld.