While in King, the Court minimized the privacy interest impacted by DNA collection, in Riley, the Court relied on the mere potential for privacy harm to hold warrantless cell
phone searches unconstitutional.
Not exact matches
Vergara argued that the
search of his
phones was
unconstitutional and that the resulting incriminating evidence from the forensic
search should not be admitted at trial.
And I have also written about the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Riley v California, 573 US 1 (2014) where Chief Justice John Roberts held that a warrantless
search and seizure of digital contents of a cell
phone during an arrest violates the Fourth Amendment and is
unconstitutional.