I personally have dealt with it in several cases where, after the fact, a tel - co's cell
phone tower records are subpoenaed and then used at trial to purport to provide a location of the accused (or at least his / her cell phone) during the commission of an offence.
Not exact matches
She warned «these surveillance tools can transform cell
phones into real - time tracking devices by mimicking legitimate cell
towers and some may even have the technical capability to
record the content of calls».
They monitored 100,000 users for 6 months and
recorded the location of the cell
phone tower that transmitted each call or text message.
For example, these frequently used evidence - producing types of technology go unchallenged: (1) mobile
phone tower location evidence used to locate us - very frequently used because we all carry mobile
phones; (2) breathalyzer / intoxilyzer readings; (3) electronic
records management systems (
records are now the most frequently used kind of evidence); and, (4) the technology that produces the data used to formulate expert opinion evidence.
The
tower through which these calls are relayed is
recorded in an ancillary fashion by all cell
phone providers.
For purposes of this discussion, mobile
phone tower location data involves two technologies: (1) that which provides the mobile
phone services and thereby produces the data that is
recorded in Rogers» electronic
records management systems (ERMSs), and is later made available to the police; and, (2) the technology upon which Rogers» ERMSs are based, and is therefore that which is depended upon to accurately store and retrieve such data.
And while the level of REIT IPOs, liquidity events and mergers probably won't match the
records set in 2013, capital market transactions continue strong, and recent favorable rulings on REIT conversions have increased activity in non-traditional and specialty sectors such as data warehouses, outdoor advertising, cell
phone towers, telecommunications networks, and even solar farms.