The phony skeptic argument is that cold is not part of the rollercoaster, which to me looks like obvious nonsense.
I have a history with Andy Revkin's DotEarth, which is prone to provide fuel for sloppy thinking about weather and climate, as well as a hangout for the worst kind of clever - looking
phony skeptic arguments.
But this is the latest fallback position from
the phony skeptic barricades with their dragon's teeth.
Commenters to counter
the phony skeptics please (not to mention the false balance in the article itself, if I read it correctly)?
In addition, there are a lot of people who regard Pielke's political science and enabling of the squishy middle as distinctly unhelpful, and Curry has made a name for herself as characterized by, among others, Dr. Annan (recently adopted by
the phony skeptics because he's done some work to lower expectations about sensitivity):
Not exact matches
First of all, people who know the facts of global warming realize that it is not an «ideological» issue, and don't care whether
phony «
skeptics» call themselves «conservative» or «liberal».
What they care about is that
phony «
skeptics» are telling lies in order to obstruct and delay action to reduce GHG emissions.
However, since a high proportion of misnamed «
skeptics» are in fact deliberate liars, who endlessly repeat assertions that they well know have been repeatedly shown to be false, it will probably have little effect on the fake,
phony, Exxon - Mobil sponsored «debate» about anthropogenic climate change.
Using the word» pause» makes you a Warmist role of toilet paper — you are doing the Warmist dirty job... Spooking the public that: the non-existent global warming is only having a» pause» until the Paris conference - > makes you a» Warmist gelding» — because they can not have any legitimate proof of something that doesn't exist — they are only exploiting
Skeptic's ignorance — obsessed to be trendy; because contemporary the
phony warming is fashionable...
a # 3: the ones that accepted the
phony global warming — they are NOT
Skeptics, BUT Warmist in - bedded into the
skeptic's camp; recognized by their botanical name:» the Fake
Skeptics»
«Sheldon Whitehouse Calls for News Outlets to Suppress «Extreme» Op - Eds by Climate
Skeptics --» Senator Sheldon Whitehouse wants newspapers to stop publishing extreme and phony op - eds written by climate - change skeptics, blasting such articles an industry propaganda»» — The Washington Times, July
Skeptics --» Senator Sheldon Whitehouse wants newspapers to stop publishing extreme and
phony op - eds written by climate - change
skeptics, blasting such articles an industry propaganda»» — The Washington Times, July
skeptics, blasting such articles an industry propaganda»» — The Washington Times, July 14, 2016
He knows that he is safe, because if the Fake
Skeptics say: Warmist don't have even 0,0000000000001 % of the data ESSENTIAL, for knowing what is the temp; would have exposed that:» their lies about past
phony GLOBAL warmings have even less data».
Recall that the university where Andrew Watson works was implicated, and then vindicated, in the
phony scandal called Climategate, in which
skeptics used out - of - context bits from stolen e-mails to make it sound as if researchers were engaged in some great conspiracy.
Whitehouse even urged the editorial boards of major newspapers to refrain from publishing «
phony «opinion» writing» pieces by climate
skeptics — in other words, pieces that disagree with his immovable opinions.
Yes, it's true — skeptical, legitimate climate scientists like the ones who run this site have been very frustrated by the deliberately deceitful pseudoscience, outright lies — and most recently vicious personal attacks against them — that have been cranked out for the last couple of decades by fossil fuel industry - funded frauds and cranks and given unwarranted legitimacy by the mass media, and regurgitated ad nauseum on blogs everywhere by Ditto - Heads who unquestioningly believe whatever drivel is spoon - fed to them by the
phony «conservative» media, and call themselves «
skeptics» for doing so.