On the whole, recent VLBI parallax measurements have shown that
photometric distance estimates, when available, tend to be considerably more accurate than kinematic estimates.
The two main techniques were kinematic and
photometric distance estimates.
Not exact matches
Factors affecting that difference apart from those already mentioned are: the different angular
distance from a target within which EBs become diluted and cause a false positive; here Brown uses a radius of 20 whereas for CoRoT, diluted EBs found by the
photometric follow - up infer a radius of about 17 (Deeg et al. 2009).
As with kinematic
distance estimates, there are a number of problems with this
photometric approach.
We present 130 ultracool dwarf discoveries with estimated
distances $ \ approx9 - 130 $ pc, including 21 that were independently discovered by other authors and 3 that were previously identified as
photometric candidates.
By combining these color data, it is possible to make a crude estimate of the
distances to the faint background galaxies (called
photometric redshift).
Based on the extreme, deduced
photometric redshift of GRB 000131 indicating that the gamma rays had travelled an extreme long cosmological
distance, astronomers predicted a «break» in the red region of the spectrum around 670 to 700 nm from the strong absorption of light from intervening intergalactic hydrogen clouds along the line of sight between GRB 000131 and the Solar System.