But these models exhibit biases over tropical continents, showing peak evaporation and
photosynthesis rates in the wrong season, as well as rain too early in the day.
Not exact matches
By comparing those disparate years to simulations of a year without tropical cyclone events, Lowman was able to calculate the effect tropical cyclones have on the
rates of
photosynthesis and carbon uptake
in forests of the southeastern United States.
Photosynthesis — the process green plants use to convert energy from the sun that plants use to grow — from tropical forests, plays a huge role
in determining global atmospheric CO2 concentration, which is closely linked the global temperature and
rate of climate change.
For many crops more carbon dioxide means a rise
in the
rate of
photosynthesis and, therefore,
in growth; and with increased carbon dioxide some plants» use of water is more efficient, according to studies done
in conventional glass greenhouses.
It's long been known that as levels of CO2
in the atmosphere rise, plants can increase their
rate of
photosynthesis.
Not well, according to this paper: when top and bottom leaves are placed
in the same low light, the lower canopy leaves showed lower
rates of
photosynthesis.
Seagrasses also undergo a high
rate of
photosynthesis that may serve to buffer changes
in ocean chemistry that affect shell - building organisms.
They found that
photosynthesis rates were higher during the day
in tanks containing fish, probably helped by the fish's fin strokes wafting away water containing high levels of oxygen.
«That's a
rate that is comparable to the
rate of this reaction
in natural
photosynthesis, per catalytic site,» Concepcion said.
Eventually, however, terrestrial red and green algae and the first lichens developed on land and the final big rise
in oxygen may have been caused by the «greening of the continents from around 800 million years ago,» when these simple early lifeforms on land steadily spread and broke down rocks that sustained a higher
rate of erosion and led to the release of more nutrients into the oceans that stimulated even more
photosynthesis by more newly evolved algae as well as older cyanobacteria (Nick Lane, New Scientist, February 10, 2010).
Because silver damages key enzymes involved
in energy metabolism, even low concentrations can cut
photosynthesis and growth
rates by a half
in just 15 minutes.
The researchers, noting they only looked at one species, said the work suggests that the organisms could double their
rate of
photosynthesis and calcium uptake
in carbon dioxide concentrations around double the current level of 380 parts per million.
The
rate of
photosynthesis increases as the irradiance level is increased; however at one point, any further increase
in the amount of light that strikes the plant does not cause any increase to the
rate of
photosynthesis.
[Response: Our
rate of mining CO2 from the Earth and putting it
in the atmosphere is small compared to the back - and - forth
rates of
photosynthesis and dissolution / exsolution from the ocean.
So it is quite likely that plant
photosynthesis (including that happening
in the ocean from phytoplankton) could well be constrained by CO2 concentration at 280 ppmv, with a slightly higher input from animal respiration plus emissions from the Earth's interior balancing out the natural decay
rate.
Was this «decay
rate» offset
in the past by slightly higher animal respiration than plant
photosynthesis, plus unknown CO2 emissions from submarine volcanoes and fissures
in Earth's crust?
It also suggests that water availability is a more important factor
in the
rate of
photosynthesis.
Research suggests that when there's more carbon dioxide
in the air, trees grow more quickly because the
rate of
photosynthesis speeds up.
Experiments scientists have carried out
in temperate forests and greenhouses suggest that when there's more carbon dioxide
in the air, trees can grow more quickly because their
photosynthesis rate speeds up.
Elevated CO2 could benefit crops yields
in short term by increasing
photosynthesis rates, however, there is big uncertainty
in the magnitude of the CO2 effect and that interactions with other factors.
So, consistent with previous research, the study finds that trees can use water more efficiently when there's more carbon dioxide
in the air, which makes their
rate of
photosynthesis increase.
There are two primary externalities that result from our emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — 1) an enhancement of the greenhouse effect, which results
in an alteration of the energy flow
in the earth's climate and a general tendency to warm the global average surface temperature, and 2) an enhancement of the
rate of
photosynthesis in plants and a general tendency to result
in more efficient growth and an overall healthier condition of vegetation (including crops).
you may observe that at around 400 ppmv, the net
rate of
photosynthesis in ideal greenhouse conditions begins to gain much less per additional unit of CO2; we've already hit the point of diminishing returns and by Liebig's Law of the Minimum can say with some confidence that experiments could find that additional CO2 on plants
in the wild may be net detrimental right now.
Of course, we do know that the
rate of
photosynthesis (the
rate - limiting step
in the growth of most plants) depends on temperature.
While lots of carbon cycles
in and out of the atmosphere from
photosynthesis and decay (most of that 95 % figure), the planet has a (comparably) very slow
rate of removing carbon from the atmosphere and oceans for geological timescales — only enough to roughly cancel out volcanoes and other proportionally very small «old carbon» sources.
[Response: Your argument misses the point
in three different and important ways, not even considering whether or not the Black Hills data have any general applicability elsewhere, which they may or may not: (1) It ignores the point made
in the post about the potential effect of previous, seasonal warming on the magnitude of an extreme event
in mid summer to early fall, due to things like (especially) a depletion
in soil moisture and consequent accumulation of degree days, (2) it ignores that biological sensitivity is far FAR greater during the warm season than the cold season for a whole number of crucial variables ranging from respiration and
photosynthesis to transpiration
rates, and (3) it ignores the potential for derivative effects, particularly fire and smoke,
in radically increasing the local temperature effects of the heat wave.
C (or methane hydrates / clathrates,
in case that isn't considered geologic)-RRB-, Halting all marine
photosynthesis and letting respiration / decay continue at the same
rate (it would actually decay over time as less organic C would be available) would result
in an O2 decrease at a
rate of about 0.011 % per year, but it could only fall at that
rate for about 3 weeks, with a total O2 decrease of about 0.000675 % (relative to total O2, and not counting organic C burial, which wouldn't make a big difference); Halting all land
photosynthesis and letting respirationd / decay proceed at the same
rate would cause O2 to fall about 0.027 % per year for about 19 years, with a total drop of about 0.52 %.
You said, «Halting all marine
photosynthesis and letting respiration / decay continue at the same
rate (it would actually decay over time as less organic C would be available) would result
in an O2 decrease at a
rate of about 0.011 % per year, but it could only fall at that
rate for about 3 weeks, with a total O2 decrease of about 0.000675 %»
As more carbon dioxide dissolves into the water column, phytoplankton are able to increase their
rate of
photosynthesis, resulting
in the production of more dissolved organic matter and the release of various nutrients.