Sentences with phrase «physical living arrangements»

In Colorado, the term «shared custody» refers to shared physical living arrangements, and the term «joint custody» refers to shared decision making.

In addition, it can reflect the quality or status of the relationships, the social structure or physical living arrangements.

A plan for shared parenting shall include factors relating to physical living arrangements, child support obligations and the home where the child will reside for school vacations, holidays and days of importance (i.e. birthdays).

Physical custody refers to the child's physical living arrangement.

Not exact matches

Second, the physical space you live in and the arrangement of the things you come across can dramatically alter your behavior.

(Y) oung adults who lived in sole - custody arrangements expressed more feelings of loss and more often viewed their lives through the lens of divorce, compared to those young adults who grew up in more shared physical custody arrangements.

Turunen J, Fransson E, Bergström M. Self - esteem in children in joint physical custody and other living arrangements.

In addition, when parents live a bit farther apart, it can be common to have a joint physical arrangement where the child will stay primarily with one parent, but split weekends and holidays between the two.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

While most of biology and medicine focus on the key roles genes and chemicals play in the formation and control of living systems, the spatial arrangement of the components that make up those systems and the physical forces they experience are being increasingly recognized as equally important.

«Also in real life, organs have an epithelial lining, a vascular component, connective tissues and immune cells, none of which can yet be replicated in their normal physical arrangement in organoids,» says Donald Ingber, founding director of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University.

But my desire for the freedom to start my own business would outweigh any physical purchase or living arrangement... so far I was right.

The West Side Highway, reduced to a slab of grey, curves into a gorgeous arrangement of red and orange squares that live a double life: they are both light - filled depictions of buildings alongside the highway and a jaunty patchwork of color, completely satisfying as simply heavy, physical, bristly paint.»

His series Studio Physics thus addresses «the physical phenomena of still and moving objects in space over time» through multidimensional still life compositions, the product of an involved process for which the artist first creates and photographs a still life arrangement — of oranges scattered over a table, for instance.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

Kansas judges deciding custody cases must determine «legal custody,» which refers to the responsibility to make educational, medical and other major decisions for a child, and «physical custody,» meaning the child's living and visitation arrangement with the parents.

A: In North Carolina, physical custody deals with the actual parenting schedule and living arrangements for the children.

Courts therefore consider the income of both parents, the physical, educational and emotional needs of the child and the living arrangements when deciding the amount of child support owed.

Physical custody deals with the child's living arrangements, while legal custody enables a parent to make decisions about the child's life.

Instead, shared custody and split custody are two arrangements that relate to physical custody, where the child lives.

Physical custody in New York relates to where the children primarily live or whether there is a joint custody arrangement between the former spouses.

Unless you've been living under a rock for the past couple of months, I'm sure you're aware that Samsung opted for a set of on - screen navigation keys for the Galaxy S8 — and I'm especially pleased with its decision, because I was never really a fan of the physical Home button arrangement on its former flagships.

Physical custody is the term given to living arrangements in which the kids stay with one parent and then stay with the other.

Joint physical care means each parent is entitled to a shared living arrangement with the child in which neither parent has greater rights over the other to spend time with the child.

In such a scenario, joint custody pertains only to a sharing of the decision - making responsibilities whereas physical care is determinative of the living arrangements.

Mothers most commonly reported that their children were in the care of relatives (65 %) with 11 % reporting that their child was in the child protection system.15 Disruption to a child's living arrangements, including separation from parents and siblings, can result in psychological and emotional distress.16 17 A recent systematic review and meta - analysis of 40 studies that investigated child outcomes when either parent was incarcerated found a significant association with antisocial behaviour (pooled OR = 1.6, 95 % CI 1.4 to 1.9) and poor educational performance (pooled OR = 1.4, 95 % CI 1.1 to 1.8).18 Other research indicates that children of incarcerated mothers are at risk of increased criminal involvement, mental health issues, physical health problems, behavioural problems, 19 child protection contact20 and poorer educational outcomes.21

Absent a joint custody agreement by the parents that includes an unequal physical custody arrangement, a judge is now required to order joint custody with an equal amount of parenting time, regardless of where the parent lives, unless one parent is ruled to be unfit.

No significant differences between participants from the two types of centres were observed in age, physical health, marital status, living arrangements, type of neighbourhood of residence, type of housing and car in the household.

The court considers each spouse's character, proposed living arrangements, parenting abilities, and abilities to provide for the children's physical, intellectual, emotional and spiritual well - beings.

Legal custody does not generally describe the child's living arrangements; rather, physical custody establishes where the child will live and who can spend time with her.

In many Western countries, an increasing number of children with separated parents live in a joint physical custody arrangement, that is, live equally (or close there to)... Continue reading →

Children in a joint physical custody arrangement suffered from fewer psychosomatic problems than those living mostly or only with one parent but reported more symptoms than those in non-broken families.

For example, in a shared physical custody arrangement, your child might live with you every week from Sunday through Wednesday and with his other parent Thursday through Saturday.

A shared physical custody arrangement is rarely exactly 50/50, with the child living an equal amount of time with each parent.

During a divorce, California courts determine custody arrangements for the divorcing couple's children, splitting both physical custody (who the child lives with) and legal custody (who makes important decisions for the child).

It's primarily about economic well - being, but: «Children living with both biological parents reported higher levels of life satisfaction than children living with a single parent or parent / step - parent... Controlling perceived family affluence, the difference between joint physical custody families and single mother or mother / stepfather families became non-significant... [and] children in the Nordic countries characterised by strong welfare systems reported significantly higher levels of life satisfaction in all living arrangements except in single father households.

Physical custody involves the living arrangement for the child.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

Physical custody entails a child's living arrangement and the time that they would spend with each parent.

Also called «shared custody,» «shared parenting,» or «dual residence custody» this physical custody arrangement involves having the children live with one parent for part of the week (or part of the year), and live with the other parent during the remaining time.

A sole physical custody arrangement has the child living primarily with one parent and visiting the other parent.

Physical custody refers to the child's living arrangements, time - share pattern, and responsibility for the child's day - to - day care.

[FN181] Nevertheless, the alternative of no access to this type of public benefit in one of their dwellings under a joint physical custody arrangement makes the lives of children living in poverty even more tenuous.

Some teenagers who live with joint physical custody arrangements have been doing so since they were young.

Shared physical custody means a child lives part of the time with each parent, having more frequent and substantial contact with each parent than under a sole custody arrangement, in which one parent has primary physical custody and the other has occasional visitation.

Physical custody includes the child's living arrangements, housing, clothing, meals, childcare, extracurricular activities, transportation and daily schedules.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary

A family court judge is not likely to order a joint physical custody arrangement when parents live in separate states, and with good reason.

In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.

This is in line with recent Swedish findings that children living with both parents have fewer everyday difficulties than children in single care or living in joint physical custody arrangements; furthermore, children of parents with higher life satisfaction were found to experience fewer difficulties [33].