Sentences with phrase «physical property holdings»

Hmm, seems like your goal of reducing physical property holdings to 30 % isn't really aligned with your diversification goals.

Not exact matches

Allocated gold is held as your personal property in explicit physical form.

For example, Galen Strawson, speaking of the idea that experiential properties are «reducible to nonexperiential physical properties in a way that is ultimately similar to the way in which the property of liquidity is held to be reducible to van de Waals molecular - interaction properties,» says: «This reduction is very hard — impossible — to imagine» (MR 68).

Man, he's got all the talent in the world, along with the physical properties to go with it, but either his mentality or maturity are holding him back.

Physical Abuse, Substance Abuse and Stealing: I believe if your child is stealing, being physically abusive or destructive of property or using substances, you have to hold him accountable, even if it means involving the police.

WAS is the most authoritative source of micro-data on household wealth holdings in Britain and collects detailed information on four groups of assets: property, private pensions, financial assets and physical assets.

These new 2D structures can be expected to have enhanced physical properties that could hold potential in a variety of applications.

For your analogy to hold, you are arguing that a hypothetical Star Trek near - instantaneous scanning will take place on the complete assembled structure, of complete depth at a very fine resolution, from which your definitive calculation can be made with the complete and precise understanding of the exact physical properties of such an assembly and everything in it... With the result being only good for when it was scanned.

Accordingly, a variety of consequential injuries were held not to constitute takings... Nor was government held liable for the extra expense which the property owner must obligate in order to ward off the consequence of the governmental action... But the Court also decided long ago that land can be «taken» in the constitutional sense by physical invasion or occupation by the government, as occurs when the government floods land permanently or recurrently.

If you are hurt in an elevator, conveyor or escalator accident due to the negligent actions of a manufacturer or property owner, we can help you hold them responsible for your medical bills, lost income, and future expenses for a potentially permanent physical disability as well as for emotional trauma and pain and suffering.

However, this was reversed by the Court of Appeal which held that s 2 (1) of R (D) A 1886 provided «a right to compensation for all heads of loss, including consequential loss, proximately caused by physical damage to property for which the trespassing rioter is liable at common law, save to the extent that they are excluded by the statute».

You'll also be held liable for bodily injury and physical harm done to persons on your property, too.

Although the time - honoured saying «buyer beware»» still holds, in law the seller has a legal obligation to disclose what are considered «latent» defects in the property that are related to certain physical conditions or amenities.

According to Rich Vetstein, «The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held that off - site physical conditions may require disclosure if the conditions are unknown and not readily observable by the buyer and if the existence of those conditions is of sufficient materiality to affect the habitability, use, or enjoyment of the property and, therefore, render the property substantially less desirable or valuable to the objectively reasonable buyer.»

The law at that time centered around a 2012 case, Benningfield v. Zinsmeister, in which the Kentucky Supreme Court interpreted the state's dog - bite statutes in such a way as to hold landlords liable for injuries caused by certain dogs on their rental property if the dog causes damage on the property or within immediate physical reach of the property.

2d 651) holding that no cause of action exists under the Property Condition Disclosure Act; court finds buyer entitled to $ 500.00 credit under RPL § 465 (1) where seller delivered an incomplete Property Condition Disclosure Statement; seller failed to perform the duty to deliver a Disclosure Statement pursuant to the PCDA when the statement was incomplete; cause of action exists under RPL § 462 (2) for willful failure to perform the requirements of the PCDA where (i) a deliberate misstatement or misstatements in a fully completed and timely delivered PCDS regarding the defective condition complained of (ii) that would tend to assure a reasonably prudent buyer that no such condition existed, and (iii) which a professional inspector might not discover upon an inspection of the premises that would meet generally accepted standards in the trade; definition of «willful failure to perform» acknowledges legislative intent not to alter the respective burdens of the buyer and seller in the transactions; statutory cause of action replaces buyer's burden of having to plead and prove the seller's active physical concealment of the condition with proof that the misstatement about the condition on the PCDS was deliberate