Just like film stills, the works of Villar Rojas are objects filled with time, devices that narrate time through images, from prehistoric finds to the most futuristic, or post-apocalyptic, landscapes, recording it in
the physical substance of matter, in a constant process of evolution and decay.
Not exact matches
For Whitehead the polarity
of «
physical» and «mental» pole is primarily intended to supersede Cartesian dualism that posits spirit and
matter as separate
substances.
Following upon his reconstruction
of the concepts
of infinity,
matter and motion Leclerc argued that at the intersection
of such basic insights into
physical existence, lurks confusion about the status
of compound
substances.
An occasion is a throb
of experience, so
of course its «
physical pole» can not consist
of matter, in the sense
of a permanent unfeeling
substance; and consciousness is too slight and occasional to define the «mental pole.
One can at least glimpse how
physical theory might someday provide an account
of «spiritual
substances [capable]
of coherently interacting with
matter,» all within a framework fitting pretty comfortably with the current structure
of physical law yet allowing for mental or spiritual agency, including the possibility
of free will.
Central and basic was the concept
of matter, for
matter was the
physical substance constituting the realm
of nature and was thus the principle object
of scientific inquiry.
From the press release: «The theory
of materialism, in modern philosophy, maintains that
substance and
matter are the only
physical realities.
In particular a missing
substance dubbed «Cold Dark
Matter» is required to explain the existence
of the
physical structure
of reality.
The theory
of materialism, in modern philosophy, maintains that
substance and
matter are the only
physical realities.
Anchored in their
physical substance they transcend mere
matter -
of - factness and open the mind to complex geometries
of thought and feeling, what Agnes Martin once referred to as «non-objective experiences.»
The Court is correct that «[c] arbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrofluorocarbons,» ante, at 26, fit within the second half
of that definition: They are «
physical, chemical,...
substance [s] or
matter which [are] emitted into or otherwise ente [r] the ambient air.»
SCALIA, J. (Dissenting, page 08): «Air pollutant» is defined by the Act as «any air pollution agent or combination
of such agents, including any
physical, chemical,...
substance or
matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air.»
Since greenhouse gases come within the capacious phrase «any
physical, chemical,...
substance or
matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air,» they must also be «air pollution agent [s] or combination [s]
of such agents,» and therefore meet the definition
of «air pollutant [s].»
Page 26 (Opinion): The statutory text reads: «The Clean Air Act's sweeping definition
of «air pollutant» includes «any air pollution agent or combination
of such agents, including any
physical, chemical...
substance or
matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air.»