Sentences with phrase «physics of the greenhouse effect»

The evidence for this hypothesis is the well established physics of the greenhouse effect itself and the correlation of increasing global carbon dioxide concentration with rising global temperature.

Not the problem here, you, generic, have moved the goal posts, you have taken out actual opposition on the substance of «climate change» which should be the actual physics of the Greenhouse Effect, and now promote your view as the «opposition», and for the most part in discussions supposedly open to discussion, the view of the real «deniers» is written out...

While you might argue that the best quantitative and detailed estimates come from computer models, the physics of the greenhouse effect are very basic indeed.

WRT 124: ER1: «the physics of the greenhouse effect are very basic» S: This is true.

I like how he dismisses atmospheric physics and earth science as inconsequential; and how he rejects not only geological evidence of past change in atmospheric composition but also the carbon cycle and the physics of the greenhouse effect.

Nothing has changed when it comes to climate sensitivity, to the temperature record, to the physics of the greenhouse effect, to the energy budget, to the Arctic sea ice, the melting permafrost in Siberia and all the other effects of global warming.

The physics of the greenhouse effect is rather quite straightforward.

An overview of the physics of the greenhouse effect including comparisons with Venus and Mars; overview of the carbon cycle in its role as a global thermostat; predictions and reliability of climate model forecasts of the greenhouse world; an examination of the records of recent and past climates.

The «hockey stick» may be a cause celebre among denialists, but it's only a secondary part of the mainstream case for global warming, which is based on the physics of the greenhouse effect and the observed warming of recent decades.

And despite all the quibbles in the early part of the last thread, there's no dispute about the basic physics of the greenhouse effect.

In this way I've benefited from courses on global climate change, climatology, future energy supply and demand, the physics of the greenhouse effect and planetary radiation balance, and climate politics and policy options.

may be a cause celebre among denialists, but itâ $ ™ s only a secondary part of the mainstream case for global warming, which is based on the physics of the greenhouse effect and the observed warming of recent decades.