It is as easy to
pick holes in that argument as it is to pick the insects from another ape's back.
I pick holes in the argument — and Jaynes, disconcertingly, proffers answers a few pages on.
So you end up looking for more and they can say oh you're just trying to
pick holes in my argument.
Your opponent will always be trying to
pick holes in your argument to tip the balance of probabilities in their favour, so it is important that the expert witnesses testify regarding their expertise and do not provide an opinion that could be classed as conjecture.
Not exact matches
You can also poke massive
holes in the
argument's for why any of them deserve to be the No. 1 or 2 overall
pick.
Viewers
picked holes pretty quickly
in Clegg's «Lib Dems for coalition» pitch to conference, pointing out that his condemnation of single - party rule therefore undermines any argument that Lib Dem majority (or minority) government rule would be preferable, thus making his much - applauded line «In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to work with either of them because I'd be Prime Minister on my own thank you very much — and I'd like to think I'd do a better job too» fall rather fla
in Clegg's «Lib Dems for coalition» pitch to conference, pointing out that his condemnation of single - party rule therefore undermines any
argument that Lib Dem majority (or minority) government rule would be preferable, thus making his much - applauded line «
In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to work with either of them because I'd be Prime Minister on my own thank you very much — and I'd like to think I'd do a better job too» fall rather fla
In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to work with either of them because I'd be Prime Minister on my own thank you very much — and I'd like to think I'd do a better job too» fall rather flat.
If it was to
pick as many
holes as he could find
in all
arguments that would be different.
His self appointed mission looks like its to
pick as many
holes as he can find
in papers which support the consensus
argument.
If I made the same
argument that Creationists should not try to
pick holes in Darwinian Evolutionary theory, would you think that was «silly» too?
Because Matthew needs to be able to recognise a good
argument when he sees one; not to
pick factual
holes in arguments he already disagrees with because his parents do.