That's something we can talk about, assuming we have the
evidence, and someone does: in this
piece on FrontlineClub.com, Daniel Bennet does a great job
of finding the words
of the
actual protest organizers themselves, showing that they used just about every online tool in the arsenal to turn out the crowds, from blogs to Facebook to Twitter, email newsletters, YouTube videos and one - on - one SMS text messages.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative
evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare
actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half
of this
piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression
of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number
of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx
of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends
of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels
of ghg has stabilized.