Sentences with phrase «pieces by climate skeptics»

Whitehouse even urged the editorial boards of major newspapers to refrain from publishing «phony «opinion» writing» pieces by climate skeptics — in other words, pieces that disagree with his immovable opinions.

Not exact matches

The observed CO2 increase in the world ocean disproves another popular #fakenews piece of the «climate skeptics»: namely that the CO2 increase in the atmosphere might have been caused by the outgassing of CO2 from the ocean as a result of the warming.

DeSmogBlog has some very worthwhile pieces on the climate files, including a narrative summary of some years - long threads by Elizabeth May, the leader of Canada's Green Party (her conclusion: they show scientists at work); a description of review processes undertaken by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change posted by Kevin Trenberth, whose e-mail messages were highlighted by quite a few climate contrarian - skeptic - realist - denier types (pick one depending on your worlclimate files, including a narrative summary of some years - long threads by Elizabeth May, the leader of Canada's Green Party (her conclusion: they show scientists at work); a description of review processes undertaken by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change posted by Kevin Trenberth, whose e-mail messages were highlighted by quite a few climate contrarian - skeptic - realist - denier types (pick one depending on your worlClimate Change posted by Kevin Trenberth, whose e-mail messages were highlighted by quite a few climate contrarian - skeptic - realist - denier types (pick one depending on your worlclimate contrarian - skeptic - realist - denier types (pick one depending on your worldview).

At the end of my August 7th blog piece, I mentioned how any prominent person insinuating that industry money corrupts skeptic climate scientists seems to be separated from Ross Gelbspan by three degrees or less.

In my prior piece about the spread of Ross Gelbspan's accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid by the fossil fuel industry to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact ``, I barely skimmed the surface of the sheer number of repetitions of it.

This is the same NPR which featured two attack pieces on skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon here and here, in which the first piece said Dr Soon was valuable to the «forces of climate denial» (the now non-functioning link was to an older version of Dr Soon's Heartland Institute bio page, later replaced by a newer one), and the second piece cited the same Kert Davies who I traced back to the time when the false «crooked skeptic climate scientists» accusation first got its media traction.

Chris Horner was paid $ 18,600 by coal company Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. «before it filed for chapter 11 this summer [2015],» according to the Wall Street Journal's Bankruptcy Beat piece, «Alpha Natural Discloses Payments to Climate Change Skeptic Chris Horner.»

I concluded my last blog piece by suggesting there might be three degrees or less separation between Ross Gelbspan and others who say skeptic climate scientists are corrupt.

The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism looks at both the evidence that human activity is causing global warming and the ways that climate «skeptic» arguments can mislead by presenting only small pieces of the puzzle rather than the full picture.

Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.

For the uninitiated, Lord Monckton is the chap who recently claimed to have been a key influence on moving Margaret Thatcher to the climate skeptic camp, and whose climate change presentation was recently picked apart piece - by - piece and source - by - source by Dr John Abraham of the University of St. Thomas, Minnesota.

The bit in my A.T. piece was how Robert McClure (a Society of Environmental Journalists board member who had previously offered me the unsupported idea that Gelbspan's work was also documented by others) quoted Dykstra's concern over skeptic climate scientist Patrick Michaels getting too much «false» media balance.

«Climate Deniers Are Giving Us Skeptics a Bad Name — Fred Singer Posted on 17 March 2012 by John Mason «Somebody recently drew our attention to a provocatively - titled piece by Fred Singer on the website of the Independent Institute, another of those many political think - tanks over in the USA.