As such, I don't think the ProCD case applies in my situation due to the qualitative differences between licensing CD - ROMs with vast amounts of information that has been compiled and which has value added search features added to it versus the «sale» of single copies of public domain sheet music (however, a library that creates and licenses for sale a CD - ROM with hundreds of individual
pieces of public domain sheet music might be protected by the principles in ProCD since a court might recognize and protect the library's investment of time and money in creating the CD - ROM, but even in that situation, if the library is not otherwise adding value - added information above and beyond the public domain content, it is not obvious that ProCD applies).
In addition to criticisms of the quality of e-books being self published, meanwhile, there have also been complaints about an increase in e-book «spam» in the Amazon Kindle store, including books that are clearly just cobbled together from bits and
pieces of public domain titles or even copyrighted works (Reuters reported recently that there are DVD instruction manuals that tell users how to write and publish dozens of e-books a day without having to write anything).
Not exact matches
The case hinges on questions
of who owns a
piece of data and the circumstances under which the information can be viewed as residing in the
public domain, accessible by all and sundry.
Oh, and we have bit and
pieces of it that aren't out in the
public domain.
But for those
of you uninterested in buying and reading the book, you can actually find a similar - minded opinion
piece by Crichton criticizing climate science (and everything from SETI and the «Drake Equation» to Carl Sagan in the process) here in the
public domain.
I can't say categorically that I cross-license all my code here into the
public domain, because code in my answers is frequently a «derivative work»
of code from the question, and
of course I can't re-license OPs» work without their permission; but suffice it to say, if you take code that I post here and adapt it for use in a non-trivial program
of which my code is a trivial or incidental
piece, then please don't worry about my rights under CC BY - SA.
I have been quite silent as a SLAW poster due to research I am conducting on early Canadian ragtime sheet music (circa 1899 - 1920) and have been trying to assess the possible
public domain status
of several
pieces of sheet music.