Sentences with phrase «pipeline capacity from»

Analysis by Ensys, supported by the Department of Energy, has found that there is plenty of existing pipeline capacity from Alberta to the U.S. through 2025 (over 2 million barrels capacity per day — we currently import about 1 mbpd).

As export pipeline capacity from Norway is already at its maximum and is unlikely to grow any further, Russia seems to stand gain the most from the demise of Dutch indigenous gas production.

Kinder Morgan will announce this month whether they will proceed with a $ 3.8 - billion plan to double existing pipeline capacity from Alberta to Burnaby.

Not exact matches

Alberta and B.C. have been locked in a battle over the future of Kinder Morgan's $ 7.4 - billion plan to triple the capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline, which runs from Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C.

The only options for Canada's oil producers are the Trans Mountain expansion, which will triple the line's existing capacity from 300,000 to 890,000 bpd, taking Alberta to Canada's Pacific Coast and Enbridge's Line 3 expansion to Wisconsin, which will boost the pipeline's capacity and is much more likely to move forward.

Enbridge has proposed a C$ 8.2 billion ($ 6.4 billion) replacement of its existing Line 3 export pipeline, which extends from Alberta into Wisconsin, doubling capacity on the line to 760,000 barrels per day.

The Trans Mountain expansion almost triples the capacity of the existing pipeline, which is designed to carry crude from Canada's oil sands to the West Coast.

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.

Already, there is insufficient pipeline capacity to pump it back from the middle of the bowl to the edges.

The export market will also still be constrained even with Enbridge's expected 450,000 barrels a day of expansion, but the IEA raised doubts that the capacity additions from Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain and TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline projects will actually get built.

On Monday, Kinder Morgan Canada formally applied to the National Energy Board for permission to triple the capacity of its Trans - Mountain oil pipeline from Edmonton to the Pacific Coast and expand export capacity at its Westridge Marine Terminal in Burnaby, B.C.. We'll spare you the details of the 15,000 - page filing.

The gap between what markets pay for light Texas crude and Alberta's heavy blend has risen to $ 30 US per barrel from $ 10 last year, largely because of the pipeline capacity crunch.

The current owner of the pipeline, American energy giant Kinder Morgan, recently expanded capacity to 300,000 barrels per day»... to transport growing volumes of product from Alberta's oil sands.»

Guidance from pipeline company Enbridge Inc. that it will modestly reallocate some light oil pipeline space on its Mainline for heavy crude and additional rail capacity smoothed the flow of oil, analysts have said.

The $ 7.4 - billion Trans Mountain project would expand the existing pipeline's capacity from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000, according to Kinder Morgan.

A final investment decision has been made to move forward with a 1.9 Bcf / d pipeline being jointly developed by Kinder Morgan, DCP Midstream and Targa Resources that would allow more shale gas to move from the Permian Basin to the Texas Gulf Coast after the project secured long - term shipper commitments for about 85 % of its capacity, the companies said Thursday.

The industry has expanded pipeline capacity and found other ways, such as rail cars, to get oil from the middle of the country to major demand centers on the coasts.

That is because it was proposed in requests from oil companies to help them reach new markets by expanding the capacity of North America's only pipeline with access to the West Coast of Canada.

That was because it was proposed in requests from oil companies to help them reach new markets by expanding the capacity of North America's only pipeline with access to the West Coast.

The U.S. is awash in natural gas from newly exploited shale deposits, but New Englanders paid record prices for gas this past winter because of inadequate pipeline capacity.

Expected to cost approximately $ 7.4 billion, it will create a pipeline system with a nominal capacity rising from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day.

The country had been working on recovering the 700,000 barrels - per - day of production capacity it lost from attacks before the NDA's pipeline assault on Friday.

This would save them either selling the naptha as part of the product (in which case more would need to be produced or purchased and imported from the US), or having to separate the naptha from the dilbit to send back to Alberta for reuse, reducing pipeline capacity as it is then filling a pipe going the opposite direction.

Any reduction in oil sands output from the levels imposed by the emissions cap will create even more surplus pipeline export capacity without the Trans Mountain project.

The Water Authority's haul from the sale of federal lands eventually came to almost $ 300 million and helped bolster financing for the pipelines, tunnels, pumps and more that Las Vegas eventually built to double its capacity to move water out of the Colorado River.

A lack of capacity on this end along with pipelines facing environmental opposition have led California refiners to import oil, often from foreign sources, via ship and pay a higher price for doing it.

Enbridge also has applied to double pipeline capacity of Line 67 (formerly the Alberta Clipper pipeline) from the tar sands to Superior, Wisconsin.

Atlantic Coast can't get permission from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to build the pipeline unless it can show the pipeline is needed, and the only way to show need is by having customers lined up to buy the capacity.

Gas utilities in New England routinely scheduled gas deliveries without actually flowing gas, preventing others (primarily gas - fired generators) from accessing pipeline capacity.

But the conclusion of an international agreement to limit Iran's nuclear arms capacity, which would lift the international sanctions that have restricted Iranian energy exports, would give new momentum to the planned construction of an ultra-deepwater natural - gas pipeline across the Arabian Sea, from Iran to India's west coast.

The research needs that have high priority in establishing the technical, environmental, and economic feasibility of large - scale capture and disposal of CO -LCB- sub 2 -RCB- from electric power plants are: (1) survey and assess the capacity, cost, and location of potential depleted gas and oil wells that are suitable CO -LCB- sub 2 -RCB- repositories (with the cooperation of the oil and gas industry); (2) conduct research on the feasibility of ocean disposal, with objectives of determining the cost, residence time, and environmental effects for different methods of CO -LCB- sub 2 -RCB- injection; (3) perform an in - depth survey of knowledge concerning the feasibility of using deep, confined aquifers for disposal and, if feasible, identify potential disposal locations (with the cooperation of the oil and gas industry); (4) evaluate, on a common basis, more» system and design alternatives for integration of CO -LCB- sub 2 -RCB- capture systems with emerging and advanced technologies for power generation; and prepare a conceptual design, an analysis of barrier issues, and a preliminary cost estimate for pipeline networks necessary to transport a significant portion of the CO -LCB- sub 2 -RCB- to potentially feasible disposal locations.

In the face of such broad support, the Sheriff's office, Suarez, and county attorney, Micheal P. Short, have decided to take the side of Energy Transfer, which has used eminent domain against local landowners and which threatens sacred and traditional Native territories along the pipeline route.Energy Transfer's pipeline would move approximatly 470,000 barrels oil per day with capacity to move 570,000 barrels daily from the Bakken fields of North Dakota to be exported out to the gulf.

The pipeline company is seeking federal approval to increase the capacity of Line 9B from 240,000 barrels a day to 300,000, and to reverse its flow to eastbound.

The current owner of the pipeline, American energy giant Kinder Morgan, recently expanded capacity to 300,000 barrels per day»... to transport growing volumes of product from Alberta's oil sands.»

No matter the new pipeline capacity added, or the tar sands projects cancelled, every June since 2012 CAPP has warned that tar sands producers are about to run out of pipeline capacity — as you can see from the graphs CAPP publishes, which look the same every year, only adjusting the base year.

Regarding the power market situation, the operational plant capacity in the current term has increased about five-fold to 5 GW (early 2016) and until 2020 a further doubling is expected from the current project pipeline.

«It is not self - evident that the addition of an 830,000 barrels - per - day capacity pipeline from Canada to refineries in the Gulf Coast will have no effect on emissions from refineries in that area,» the EPA wrote in response to the State Department's conclusion that the pipeline would not disproportionately affect minorities and low - income residents living near refineries.

Further, building Keystone XL would imply that the case for Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline becomes more about financial advantage gained from access to multiple markets and less about the need for physical export capacity - relatively new territory for regulatory processes.

As power demand growth slows from a historical average of 10 % to 3 % or less per year, the coal capacity in the pipeline, as well as some existing coal capacity, risks becoming stranded due to low carbon capacity targets, ongoing reforms in the power sector and carbon pricing.

Over 500,000 miles of natural gas and petroleum products transmission pipelines cross the United States, and that capacity must be expanded to keep pace with 21st century production trends and to ensure that Americans from every state share in the benefits of affordable domestic energy.

Enbridge applied for a State Department permit two years ago for its latest project: a bid to increase the capacity of its «Alberta Clipper» pipeline from 450,000 to 800,000 barrels of tar sands crude per day.

Meanwhile, Kinder Morgan wants to expand its Trans Mountain pipeline system, nearly tripling its capacity so it can carry up to 600,000 more barrels of tar - sands oil a day from Alberta to B.C..

«New Canadian oil - sands development is increasingly economically questionable without the additional export capacity that pipelines such as Keystone XL would bring», says Mark Lewis, external research advisor to a report from Carbon Tracker, a think - tank focused on the investment risks posed by excessive fossil fuel extraction.

Alberta and B.C. have been locked in a battle over the future of Kinder Morgan Canada's $ 7.4 - billion plan to triple capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline, which runs from Edmonton to Burnaby.

The new pipeline would triple the amount of diluted bitumen transported through a seismically active area of the Southwest coast of British Columbia, double the oil storage tank capacity on Burnaby Mountain above heavily populated areas and dramatically increase the number of Aframax tankers required to ship the oil from Kinder Morgan's marine terminal through Burrard Inlet and coastal waters.

If built, the Trans Mountain expansion would triple the capacity of an existing pipeline network along a modified route, allowing oil companies to ship up to 890,000 barrels of bitumen, heavy oil from Alberta's oilsands sector, to a marine terminal in the Metro Vancouver City of Burnaby.

Kinder Morgan has secured commitments from 13 of Western Canada's largest oil producers that they will ship heavy and light crude through the pipeline once its capacity is tripled.

«Far from needing new pipelines, the oil sands industry will soon have problems filling the capacity of existing ones in tomorrow's emission - constrained world,» he said.

Enbridge applied to the National Energy Board to approve a pipeline project — specifically, to reverse the flow of one section of an existing pipeline, expand the capacity of the pipeline, and exempt the project from certain regulatory requirements and procedures to allow for the transportation of heavy crude oil.