Not exact matches
Personally I'm not a fan of this smartphone as I
feel phones of this size are best left to the feature phone department as the screen (2.8 inches) is just too small with a low resolution and
pixel density display.
It's no wonder that most consumers with decent home theater systems
feel like they're getting an equal or better experience to the movie theater: WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A FEW MORE HORIZONTAL
PIXELS, THE IMAGE IS EXACTLY THE SAME RESOLUTION IN 1080P and 2K, and the pixel density (measured in PPI or pixels per inch) is quite a bit denser on a consumer 1080p di
PIXELS, THE IMAGE IS EXACTLY THE SAME RESOLUTION IN 1080P and 2K, and the
pixel density (measured in PPI or
pixels per inch) is quite a bit denser on a consumer 1080p di
pixels per inch) is quite a bit denser on a consumer 1080p display.
Despite the reduction in
pixel density, it still
feels like the Moto G is packing a crisp display.
Although it must be said that the resolution and
pixel density work perfectly for such a small display, you are left
feeling that for the price you should be getting something more.
It's nice to know that you have the highest
pixel density going on a phone, but you can't help but
feel that Sony did this because it wanted the distinction of offering a 4K display under its belt, rather than because it wanted users to enjoy very marginally superior images.
I
feel like when screen size expands beyond 5.5 - inches, the
pixel density you get from a 2560 x 1440 Quad HD display makes text look sharper; a higher - res display will be extra important when Huawei inevitably makes a big push into mobile virtual reality.