Sentences with phrase «pixels per inch when»

Not exact matches

When it comes to their respective pixels - per - inch (PPI), the three FHD displays... 1920 x 1080 pixels... fall very close to one another — the Moto X has 424 PPI, the Xperia Z3 has 424 PPI and the HTC One M9 has 441 PPI, due to its slightly smaller display size.

At the same time, the iPad mini's resolution of 163 pixels per inch is a disappointment, especially when you consider that both the Nexus 7 and the Kindle Fire HD have pixel densities of 216 pixels per inch.

That naturally means the 8.4 - inch equivalent will look a tad sharper, thanks to cramming in more pixels per square inch, but both are impressive in a day when Full HD or HD screens are the norm.

Everything changed when TV display became defined by a pixels - per - inch metric.

When Apple introduced the fourth generation iPhone last June, Steve Jobs made a lot of hay about the 326 pixel - per - inch density of its 960 x 640 Retina display.

The One boasts 468 pixels per inch (ppi), which narrowly beats the S4's 441ppi, but I really couldn't tell any difference between them, even when looking close up.

The Swift 2's 5 - inch IPS screen has a 720p resolution and a pixel density of 294 pixels per inch, which is quite low when compared to leading Android phones — and many other low and mid-range challengers, like the Moto G5.

When the screen's just a few inches from your eyeballs, the difference between 500 and 800 - ish pixels per inch will seem like night and day.

Unfortunately it's not quite high - resolution enough to prevent you from being able to discern individual pixels when you wear it, and the HTC Vive Pro, with its 78 % increase in dots per inch, offers a much sharper screen in addition to built - in audio, which the original Vive lacks.

It offers 368 pixels per inch and looks gorgeous when on full brightness.

On smaller displays, 1080p is still just fine, but when it comes to a 5.7 - inch panel, the pixel density drops down to 386 pixels per inch.

It's a shame the company hasn't opted for a higher resolution, but at 401 pixels per inch it looks great when you're watching video, and as it's AMOLED, blacks and other dark tones look great.

When it comes to their respective pixels - per - inch (PPI), the three FHD displays... 1920 x 1080 pixels... fall very close to one another — the Moto X has 424 PPI, the Xperia Z3 has 424 PPI and the HTC One M9 has 441 PPI, due to its slightly smaller display size.

And before you try and argue that 1080p isn't high enough of resolution, let's be real — 400 pixels per inch on a screen is plenty; and as I'll get into in further detail in this review, it definitely has benefits when it comes to performance and battery life.

No, not really, unless you start closely examining pixel density — a rather lowly 373 pixels - per - inch here, when phones such as the Galaxy S7 Edge have 534ppi.

Sporting 1080p resolution at a 5.5 - inch size, the 400 pixels - per - inch density looks sharp and clean even when holding the screen close, and keeps performance at an acceptable level too.

That doesn't just boast a higher pixel density, with a 2560 × 1600 resolution serving 339 pixels - per - inch, but it also outperforms the iPad when it comes to brightness, contrast rating, contrast ratio, power efficiency, and more.

It works out to a relatively meagre 373 pixels per inch, but when viewing general content it looks similar to most other phones you can buy right now.

It only had a 720p display resolution and 245 pixels - per - inch (PPI), when all other devices were coming in at 1080p and even the LG G3 had 1440p.

On the whole — when it's bright enough to see — the G5's display is impressive, with a ridiculously sharp 554 pixels per inch and exceptional clarity.

For the most part this is a true statement, as the 400 pixel - per - inch density is well above «retina» levels and keeps things looking sharp even when holding it close.