Not exact matches
Good point Jack, but the «book» that muslims follow, regardless
of training or translation, gives Christians chills because it
places the dispensation
of Jesus: «Love thy neighbor as thyself» under and beneath the later dispensation
of Muhammed which in fact harks back to the
old testament, earlier Hebraic tribal codes.
Old Testament Prophecies: «The Lord swore to David a promise he will never take back: «I will
place one
of your descendants on your throne.
The
old testament sanctuary service (at the outer court where the lamb was slain, in the holy
place, and in the most holy
place) is profoundly crucial in understanding the plan
of salvation.
And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have
older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been
placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been
placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning
of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those
of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later
Old and New
Testament prophets and apostles.
With all their laudable effort to understand the integrity
of the Scriptures, both
Old and New, and to insist on the basic unity
of the Bible; with all their recognition
of the
place of Jesus within the setting
of Jewish piety and religious thought, these scholars sometimes fail to see that the very truth about God which the Bible as a whole affirms, and above all that which the New
Testament says about Jesus himself, can be smothered by sheer biblicism and thereby made meaningless for those to whom the gospel should be a living, vitalizing, and contemporary message.
In the
Old Testament we see the change
of the name
of a person taking
place in keeping with a change in that person's work and mission.
The early strata
of the
Old Testament are full
of intimations that, far from being spiritually available to the seeking soul at any
place or time, Yahweh was to be sought only at his special shrines — «In every
place where I cause my name to be remembered I will come unto thee.»
By the time the writings
of the
Old Testament were being put into final form, they had assumed a
place of preeminence in the life
of the Hebrew nation.
In the final form
of the
Old Testament, the Ten Commandments are given a special
place and a very special name.
He tells us to take up the shield
of faith, but we learn by going back to the
Old Testament that the shield is actually God Himself, and He protects us, when, as Christians, we
place faith in Him.
How about when they take an oath in the
Old Testament by having someone
place their hand «under the thigh»
of another man?
He
placed little or no value on the
Old Testament --»... the faith
of the
Old Testament is not a religion
of salvation» (Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, p. 112).
At the time
of the
Old Testament, God's Covenants were in
place for His people
of the time, as revealed first verbally from generation to generation, then when Hebrew became a written language, by Moses and the prophets, and through all time the intended audience knew as much about their condition and need for salvation as God wanted them to know at the time.
While the
old testament and the bible (as in the new
testament) refer to the creation
of the heavens and earth (as well as the Quran for Muslims), I find it humbling that the Quran went even further to attest to the WAY this creation took
place (in other words the Big bang theory is a
testament to this verse).
In the second century, at the time when the Canon
of the New
Testament was beginning to be formed, there was a controversy about the
place which the
Old Testament should occupy in the Church.
In the first
place the Messiah as prophesied in the
Old Testament was to be
of divine nature.
The bread and hymns / prayers which mark Jesus» cultic action at the Last Supper are the New
Testament fulfilment known as the Eucharist
of the
Old Testament zebach toda, with the unique bloody death
of Jesus on the cross taking the
place of the temple sacrifices.
And yet just as Jesus intentionally sets His face toward Jerusalem, to take His
place on an accursed cross between two criminals for the sins
of all mankind and thus defeat the devil at his own game, is it not possible that in the
Old Testament, God also does the same thing?
As far as
old testament teachings, they had their
place in Gods great plan and I see where people get caught in the dogma
of that.
THings that took
place 4000 - 5000 years ago that make up the
old testament are not part
of our current marching orders.
Even where we do read in Scripture about tithing (a few
places in the
Old Testament, and fewer still in the New), the practice then was not at all what we are encouraged to practice today: giving 10 %
of your income to the church.
Monergism as an article
of faith occurs many
places in the
Old Testament.
I actually think that there are clear statements by Jesus in numerous
places where He denounces the violence
of the
Old Testament texts.
There are several
places in the New
Testament where the
Old is endorsed and «nothing is to be added or taken away», and Jesus himself says «no one can escape The Law
of the Pharisees».
A number ton
of battles take
place in the
Old Testament but God's love is shown through out the
Old Testament still, and how you find hate in the New
Testament is beyond me
The Septuagint was discarded as too free a rendering
of the
Old Testament, and other, even painfully literal, translations took its
place — it too was abandoned to the Christians, and one rabbi even proposed to commemorate it by an annual day
of fasting.
First, it is not unimportant that the legislative texts
of the
Old Testament are
placed in the mouth
of Moses and within the narrative framework
of the sojourn at Sinai.
Herod's Sanhedrin gave them the probable
place of birth by consulting the
Old Testament and finding a prophecy which designated Bethlehem as the birthplace
of the Messiah (Mic.
This blending
of the
old version and the new version is to be found in many places in the Old Testame
old version and the new version is to be found in many
places in the
Old Testame
Old Testament.
He
places strong emphasis upon cult and oral tradition; and he predicates meaningful unity only in extended sections
of the
Old Testament: the Tetrateuch, Genesis — Numbers, is a unity characterized by the pervading priestly point
of view dominant in the entire section; and Deuteronomy — II Kings is a second major unit reflecting chiefly the perspective
of the Deuteronomic point
of view.
While postexilic priestly law appears to be increasingly concerned with ritual — a concern perhaps inescapably induced by general environmental and ideological changes — it is essential to remember that all
of the major codes
of law in the
Old Testament were preserved, transmitted, and
of course edited, by the postexilic priests who, in the very act
of incorporating so - called prophetic law in the total legal corpus,
place their approval upon it.
The reason for such wide diversity in
Old Testament studies has to do with basic disagreements over the genre
of the material in the first
place and the divided convictions
of interpretive communities.
The statement makes a strong case for evangelical empathy with the State
of Israel, linking the
Old and New
Testament traditions, and reminding the public that the people
of Israel have a very special
place in Christian thought.
As happened in the case
of a number
of books in the
Old Testament, material which the editors could not appropriately insert elsewhere, they
placed at the end
of the book.
That is was also distinctly possible that gathered fragmented written sources as well as oral traditions regarding the laws
of Moses and histories
of the kings
of Israel and Judah coming from prior to Babylonian captivity were then secured and
placed into a combined written sources from which what we know as the Books
of Moses as well as other books that would be comprised into what we refer to as the
Old Testament.
As we read through the
Old Testament, we see the people
of God setting up altars all over the
place as reminders to future generations what God did at that
place.
The same applies to the idea that man's life is forfeit in the sight
of God, and that he accepts another life in
place of our own — which in the last resort is the meaning
of sacrifice in the
Old Testament.
Though I have said that God takes the blame for the sinful actions
of human beings, and even inspires people to write that He told them to do these things when He really did not, this guiding principle does not explain every evil situation that takes
place in the
Old Testament, or in the rest
of history.
Naïve Christians frequently say that damnation and Hell are
Old Testament themes which find no
place in the «good news»
of the New
Testament.
In the light
of that, I therefore have come to a new appreciation
of the
place of law and commandment in the gospel, in both
Old and New
Testaments.
This unique expression is used in the
Old Testament of the Tent
of Meeting or Tabernacle in the desert, where Moses and Aaron went to speak with God, the
place where God lived among them and beside them.
In this new and interesting development, hermeneutic has, in effect, taken the
place of kerygma and a concern for an existentialist interpretation
of the kerygma has been modified by a concern for the historical Jesus until it has become a concern for an existentialist interpretation
of the New
Testament — now seen not as a source book for knowledge
of the historical Jesus, as in the
older liberalism, but as a means whereby that faith which came to word or language in Jesus may come to be word - or language - event for us.
If this means that the
Old Testament is being taught in such schools today as a part
of theology it does not mean that the historical and critical approach to it is ignored or that inspiration and devotion have taken the
place of scholarship.
The Yahwist's
place is sure in the story
of Old Testament prophetism and the roster
of the prophets.
For it to be such a
place, we would need, for example, to form students in the tradition
of learning — and taking seriously — the different ways in which Jews and Christians understand the Hebrew Scripture or
Old Testament.
There are many
places in the
Old Testament where «heaven is used to describe the dwelling -
place of God e.g. «Hear thou from heaven thy dwelling
place; and when thou hearest forgive».
Year One draws most
of its subject matter from an unlikely
place: the
Old Testament.
Biblica: The Bible Atlas by Barry J. Beitzel, professor
of Old Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, is a massive and beautiful volume that
places the Bible in...
Driven by a bold script, amazing visuals, spine - tingling sound design and edge -
of - your - seat gameplay, this game takes
place on the remote Weylyn Island, where 22 year
old Moira Weylyn has travelled to her Grandfather's home to meet her remaining family members and witness the reading
of his last will and
testament.