Recent evaluations in England and in Maryland have shown positive results on decreasing
placement disruption rates and child behavioral and emotional problems.
Not exact matches
Risk factors associated with
placement disruption Research on individual child factors that increase risk for
placement disruption shows that increased age and the presence and severity of behavioral and emotional problems are significantly related to higher
rates of
placement disruption (Pardeck, 1984; Pardeck, Murphy & Fitzwater, 1985).
Reports of
disruption rates in traditional foster care range from 38 % to 57 % during the first 12 to 18 months of
placement (Berrick et al., 1998; Palmer, 1996; Staff & Fein, 1995; Stone & Stone, 1983), with percentages increasing with time spent in foster care.
Changes in
placement or
disruption rates are related to the length of the child's foster care stay, 55 the age of the foster child, and the functioning of the foster child (for example, mental health).56 The quality of the parent - child relationship and the caseworker - foster parent relationship also influences
placement stability.
Differences in
disruption rates by age of the child and
placement history, reasons why
disruption and dissolution occur, and
disruption and dissolution trends are noted.
KEEP provides enhanced support and training to state foster and kinship parents to prevent
placement disruptions, improve reunification
rates, and reduce child behavioral and emotional problems.
Children of parents in the KEEP group were also found to have higher
rates of reunification with biological or adoptive families and fewer
placement disruptions than those in the control condition.
For example, in San Diego, the base
rate for
disruption in kin
placements is about 9 % and 45 - 48 % from non-relative
placements.
Outcomes of interest include foster care
disruption rates,
rates of reunification with biological parents and other successful long - term
placements, changes in behavior and cognitive functioning, and success in school.
The baseline
rates for
disruption in kin and non-kin
placements vary significantly.