Sentences with phrase «plagiarized wegman»

The extensively plagiarized Wegman report is also not a reliable source for doubts about «the hockey stick».

The hockeystickers have also accused me of plagiarizing Wegman, even though my book (Assessing Climate Change) has over 400 direct quotes with attribution (including quite a few from climateaudit.org) and over 1,400 specific references to about 400 references.

Not exact matches

The 2nd Ed was the one plagiarized / altered in the Wegman Report.

Edward Wegman and Yasmin Said published two largely - plagiarized papers in a «peer - reviewed» Wiley journal they edit with David Scott.

As Bart doubtless knows, Wegman never plagiarized anything.

As observed elsewhere (I don't have the reference at hand, sorry): Either (a) The hockey stick paper (MBHxx) had bad statistics, and Wegman & co-author plagiarized various material for their report, or (b) the hockey stick paper (MBHxx) had bad statistics and Wegman & co-author didn't plagiarize various material for their support.

You do know that Wegman and Barton not only plagiarized but misinterpreted the textbook?

By the way, this is what Wegman had to say in a recent email: «It is my opinion that Dr. Rapp has not plagiarized anything and I hold him harmless» and claims that these are «wild conclusions that have nothing to do with reality».

Bradley had accused Wegman of plagiarizing his work -LRB-

Bradley had accused Wegman of plagiarizing his work (more meaningless «boilerplate,» according to Climate Audit, irrelevant to Wegman's findings) in his 2006 report that exposed statistical problems with Mann's work.

But Wegman's report may sink under the weight of plagiarized material and while that would be a pity, that's sometimes the way things work.»

«We would never knowingly publish plagiarized material» wrote Wegman, a former CSDA journal editor.»

But there is more, John Mashey and Deep Climate have now presented strong evidence that some of Wegman's students plagiarized large sections of their doctoral theses.

Not only has the Wegman report to Congress been shown by Deep Climate to have large plagiarized sections, but the gang that couldn't copy straight stated conclusions that were in direct contradiction to those of the sources they were copied from.

DP and Mashey merely audited Wegman, and he has been found to plagiarize and merely duplicate (rather than independently replicate) McIntyre's non-work.

So Wegman not only plagiarized the social network analysis and background text, he also plagiarized the core statistical analysis - the crux of his supposed value add - albeit presumably with the full awareness and tacit (if not explicit) consent of its original authors.

The evidence that Wegman plagiarized others is quite strong.

According to earlier revelations from Deep Climate, Wegman also cribbed - arguably plagiarized - work from Raymond Bradley, lifting whole sections of his 1999 textbook, but periodically changing material or inserting information calculated to cast doubt on the reliability of tree - ring data (the source of the MBH climate reconstruction).

Rapp plagiarizing a section of the Wegman report would be a problem for Rapp, but not for the report itself.

If Wegman has done a statistical analysis of his work vs. those pieces he's been accused of plagiarizing, it's news to me.

Bradley had accused Wegman of plagiarizing his work (more meaningless «boilerplate,» according to Climate Audit, irrelevant to Wegman's findings) in his 2006 report that -LSB-...]

The only private statement I can recall was that Wegman said: «It is my opinion that Dr. Rapp has not plagiarized anything and I hold him harmless.»