Not exact matches
Of primary issue will
be the following (
as taken from Judge Smith's Summary Judgment released yesterday): «
Plaintiffs [will continue to] challenge the use of EVAAS under various aspects of the Fourteenth Amendment, including: (1) procedural due process, due to lack of sufficient information to meaningfully challenge terminations based on low EVAAS scores,» and given «due process
is designed to foster government decision - making that
is both fair and
accurate.»
First, Justice Ball
was «unable to accept the
plaintiff's statements about his discussions with [the second physician]
as accurate historical statements.»
It stated that «Dr. Hershberg
was cavalier in his approach to the requirement to
be accurate with respect to his curriculum vitae, when obtaining information from the
plaintiff during the examination, and in reporting
as to the information he obtained from the
plaintiff.»