Sentences with phrase «plaintiff claims»

In Waymo v. Uber, the plaintiff claims a former employee named Anthony Levandowski stole proprietary files — 14,000 of them, to be exact — and used them to start a new company.

In particular, the representative plaintiff claims damages for loss of past and future sales, past and future profits, and loss of capital value and goodwill.

He also points out that at least 60 percent of plaintiff claims submitted to both the victim compensation fund and the settlement program were denied.

The Plaintiff was injured but ICBC advanced the LVI defence arguing that «given the very minor nature of the collision it is difficult to conceive how someone could possibly be injured, or injured in the significant fashion the plaintiff claims `.

A plaintiff injured in a motor vehicle accident on the grounds of Camp Peary when the vehicle in which he was riding collided with a vehicle being driven by an employee of a painting crew, who plaintiff claims should not...

The plaintiff claims neither McDonald's nor Wright Management conducted a criminal background check, which would have shown his prior offenses, and also claims the play area where the alleged incident took place was unsupervised.

Claims: Wrongful death, loss of consortium, strict liability, and negligence claims arising from the distribution of two - way radio components containing phenolic resins which plaintiff claims caused him to contract Mesothelioma.

The Issues In the class action, the plaintiff claims that TELUS overcharged customers by rounding... [more]

The plaintiff claims $ 25,000 for damages for wrongful dismissal and breach of the employment contract.

Plaintiff claims to be the real... mother?

A defendant may plead a set - off or counterclaim barred by the statute of limitation, while held and owned by him or her, to any action, the cause of which was owned by the plaintiff or person under whom the plaintiff claims, before such set - off or counterclaim was so barred, and not otherwise.

$ 1.5 million Patient dies from Stage IV lung cancer; plaintiff claims doctors delayed diagnosis Action: Medical malpractice Attorney: Robert M. Higgins

[6] The plaintiff claims against the defendant under all heads of damages for his personal injuries, in the total sum of $ 739,664.

The plaintiff claims he was staying a Holiday Inn Express in Pembroke, North Carolina when police came to his room in the middle of the night.

[12] In some cases, an injury — the loss for which the plaintiff claims compensation — may flow from a number of different negligent acts committed by different actors, each of which is a necessary or «but for» cause of the injury.

Plaintiff claims Justice J. FOLY has no knowledge of, nor sought any, in regards to the «treaty» in order to make any such claims, decisions or rulings whatsoever.

During the approximately three months for which the plaintiff claims past wage loss, he could have attended physiotherapy and massage sessions.

Representing a variety of clients against single - plaintiff claims alleging injury from exposure to various chemicals, including silica dust, pesticides, PAHs, isocyanates, and other industrial chemicals.

The Lohrmann test holds that when a plaintiff claims multiple sources of exposure to asbestos, he must show evidence:

If the plaintiff claims that he or she can not twist their torso fully, surveillance may be made of the plaintiff doing tasks such as minor car repairs requiring full body flexion.

Plaintiff claims to have suffered injuries in said accident and seeks to recover a judgment against Defendant for the same.

The Plaintiff claims as against the Defendant, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP («Cassels Brock»), for conspiracy, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty of good faith, breach of confidence, and negligence...

[21] As a result, the plaintiff claims I / Land failed to properly train its agents in selecting adequate parts and negligently selected, purchased and installed a defective toilet hose pipe which lacked CSA certification, violated the OBC, and, without question, caused the damage sustained.

The plaintiff claims that she has repeatedly turned down requests from to license the work in question in the past.

Plaintiff claims American Express and its vendor, Alorica, violated the TCPA by having Alorica place calls on behalf of American Express to cellular telephones between July 3, 2009 and March 15, 2016, through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system, predictive dialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice without prior express consent.

In addition, the plaintiff claims that the poison put provisions violate Section 141 (a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law which requires that the business and affairs of a Delaware corporation be run by the board.

In a recent school finance decision forced by plaintiff claims that public schools were inadequately and inequitably funded, a state of Washington judge, John Ehrlick, cut a Gordian knot that had for years tied up state legislatures from New York to Ohio and back to New Jersey.

The plaintiffs claim in their lawsuit that United employees immediately cremated Simon's remains without permission of his owners and before a necropsy could determine how he died.

The key word in the case was «flooded»: the U.S. market, the plaintiffs claimed, was flooded with Chinese - made cells and panels.

The plaintiffs claim Apple violated California's Unfair Competition Law.

AMD also had several lawsuits lodged against it after its initial statements on the Spectre / Meltdown vulnerabilities, which the Plaintiffs claim were misleading, so the company is obviously (and wisely) exercising some caution.

The plaintiffs claimed Ecolab wrongfully classified exterminators as exempt employees, making them ineligible for overtime pay.

Plaintiffs claimed that the DOL failed to comply with the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the regulation is «arbitrary and capricious.»

The aim of these recent suits (contrary to the claims of outraged separationists) is not to restore traditional religious teaching and practices, but to purge away a «counterreligion,» an alternative system of belief that the plaintiffs claim public schools are inculcating.

The plaintiffs claimed that the harm they suffered could not be addressed by suing as women only, because GM could point out that it had indeed hired women (white women) prior to 1964 and had retained those that were hired after 1970.

The plaintiff claimed that labeling on defendant Bumble Bee's products claiming that the products were an «Excellent Source [of] Omega - 3» violated the FDA's regulations.

The plaintiff claimed that Costco's initiation of a recall was evidence that it had sold a defective product.

The plaintiffs claimed that the commission placed a disproportionately large number of non-minority voters in districts dominated by Republicans; meanwhile, the commission allegedly placed many minority voters in smaller districts that tended to vote Democratic.

The plaintiff claimed that if Buhari was allowed to sell the national assets, the nation would be plunged into deeper economic and political woes.

The plaintiffs claim that still [blah].

The allegations by Kent and the others center on what the plaintiffs claim was an unfair attack on them by Spence and his allies regarding charges that a Rockland County council leader, Stephanie Lee, had misused a PEF bank card, making numerous personal purchases, which led to a court judgment of $ 64,104.88 against her.

Years after the Kingston City School District joined seven other small - city school districts in suing the state for what plaintiffs claimed were funding inequities, a judge ruled this week that the state had met its «constitutional obligation» in providing those districts with enough money.

The plaintiffs claimed that the new policy violated the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, established in 1996, which states that federal money can not be used for «research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death.»

The plaintiffs claimed the state has low graduation rates, frequent school violence, and low levels of education spending and teacher pay compared to other states.

All of the plaintiffs claim that teachers are subject to dismissals and employment actions based on seriously flawed evaluation methods.

Plaintiffs claimed that this particular diversion of funds deprives school districts, poor urban ones especially, of the ability to provide a «thorough and efficient educational system.»

Plaintiff claimed the program was enacted in violation of the state constitution's «single subject matter» rule.

The plaintiffs claim the alleged defects cause premature wear to the transmission clutch plates and other components, causing early transmission failure and expensive repairs.

The plaintiffs claim even with repairs made under the customer satisfaction programs, consumers continued to experience the same dual - clutch transmission problems.

The attorneys for the plaintiffs claim that Google's pre-loading of its suite of apps into the operating system leaves consumers no choice in making future purchases.