Based on the court where
the plaintiff files the complaint, you have a certain amount of time to answer the complaint.
Plaintiff filed a Complaint with the Department of Justice and met with officials from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) in Washington, DC.
Although
the plaintiff filed her complaint in Delaware, she argued that Maryland's statute of limitations applied.
About two years after her notice of lawsuit,
the plaintiff filed a complaint, alleging the city's negligence for failing to properly maintain its sidewalk.
In the following year,
the plaintiff filed a complaint against the allegedly negligent driver and his own insurer, alleging that the defendant driver negligently caused his injuries and that the defendant was uninsured at the time of the crash, based on the denial of coverage by ACCC.
A personal injury case is initiated when
a plaintiff files a complaint against other parties.
If all issues concerning divorce, child support, equitable division of assets, alimony, visitation and other issues are resolved between the parties, the earliest possible date for a nominal divorce (a nominal divorce is a non-contested divorce in which everything is agreed to) is approximately sixty five days after
the plaintiff files a complaint for divorce.
The plaintiff files a Complaint for Annulment in the county court.
In June 1987,
the plaintiffs filed a complaint with the State Department of Human Rights alleging defendant had engaged in unlawful advertising.
Not exact matches
On May 3, 2013, the lead
plaintiff filed a consolidated
complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule
On May 3, 2013, the lead
plaintiff filed a consolidated
complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b - 5 (b) by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and that certain defendants violated SEC Rule 10b - 5 (a) and (c) by engaging in a «scheme» to defraud investors.
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans became the sixth
plaintiff to lob a
complaint against the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule when the insurer
filed a suit in late September challenging the class - action waiver requirement under the rule's best interest contract exemption, or BICE.
On May 3, 2013,
plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint.
I would not be surprised to see an «Amended
Complaint»
filed by
Plaintiff at some point after the MSU Response is
filed and during or after Discovery.
In October, attorneys for the
plaintiffs — potentially several thousand residents of Hoosick Falls —
filed an amended federal
complaint expanding their injury claim.
The 39 - page
complaint,
filed by attorney Cheryl Sovern of Clifton Park, alleges the
plaintiffs were deprived of a fair hearing.
Plaintiffs were told to
file amended
complaints by March 27.
After graduate students
filed a
complaint on the international researchers» behalf, the
plaintiff was terminated, supposedly for unrelated reasons, such as surfing the Internet on her work computer.
Nb:
plaintiffs did
file an amended
complaint.
Plaintiffs in the second case, Wright v. New York,
filed a
complaint in July that challenges both LIFO and the law under which teachers are granted or denied tenure after three years.
When we didn't prevail in that effort, we
filed a
complaint with the Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of seven
plaintiffs contending that the question was not appropriate for the ballot.
Whereas,
Plaintiff, the United States of America
filed its
Complaint on April 11, 2012, alleging that Defendants conspired to raise retail prices of E-books in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1, and
Plaintiff and Settling Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law;
The
complaint filed on behalf of the
plaintiffs states: «Most of Author Solutions» earnings are derived from its publishing and marketing services.
In June 2008,
plaintiffs filed their petition for writ of mandate and
complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, to bar the City from implementing a policy for feral cats without first completing a CEQA environmental review.
The Injunction The original
complaint —
filed by the Urban Wildlands Group, Endangered Habitats League, Los Angeles Audubon Society, Palos Verdes / South Bay Audubon Society, Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society, and the American Bird Conservancy — was brought under the California Environmental Quality Act, with the
plaintiffs arguing, for instance, that TNR «can cause significant adverse environmental impacts by causing proliferation of rats and raccoons and creating water pollution problems.»
According to the
plaintiffs»
Complaint filed in the Arizona federal court, «Petland requires that each of its retail locations purchase puppies from suppliers it has approved, such as Hunte, and nearly everyone is either a puppy mill or a puppy mill broker.
The new trial court stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay of concern to
Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first
complaint after the
Plaintiff had
filed his amended
complaint.»
An Oregon judge ruled earlier this month that a
complaint filed by more than a dozen young
plaintiffs against the federal government — referred to by advocates as «the most important lawsuit on the planet right now» — can go to trial.
With that in mind, earlier today I
filed my Answer to
Plaintiff's Amended
Complaint.
«Since
plaintiff filed her lawsuit and charge, Proskauer's retaliation has intensified,» according to the amended
complaint.
Greenfield argues that Ginsburg advocated congressional action in Ledbetter because the Court had determined that it could not make allowances for a
plaintiff who
filed a
complaint about unequal pay where the 180 - day deadline for
filing complaints was set by statute and could not be waived.
Although the suit was initially
filed by a Jane Doe
plaintiff, in the amended
complaint filed Wednesday, the
plaintiff revealed herself to be Connie N. Bertram, a partner in Proskauer's Washington, D.C., office.
On March 9, SFL says, Judge James Lawrence King entered — sua sponte — a default against Wachovia for failing to
file a response to
plaintiff's Amended
Complaint in the case.
In a helpful decision for employers looking to minimize wasteful litigation (Frith v. Cable Birdge Enterprises Limited, 2013 ONSC 6436), an Ontario Divisional Court Judge overturned a trial court judge's decision that a
plaintiff could puruse her employer for termination pay (notice and severance) before the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) and the Superior Court even though her
complaint before the MOL was never adjudicated (it appears she withdrew her
complaint months after
filing it).
Handling all aspects of the litigation process for
plaintiffs and defendants, from pre-litigation advice through to the
filing of a
complaint, trial and appeal.
The
Plaintiff then takes 3 copies of the completed
Complaint, the Civil Cover Sheet, and a $ 78
filing fee to the Franklin County Municipal Court Civil Law Clerk at:
Every lawsuit starts with a written
complaint / petition
filed in court by the lawyer for the
plaintiff.
According to the Master
Complaint filed in this Multi-District Litigation case,
plaintiffs have alleged that NexGen Flex Knees «failed to provide additional or meaningful flexion beyond 120 degrees.»
You used an example of when a debtor moves to convert from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13, and a creditor
files a
complaint to oppose it, the judge decides the case by «finding for the
plaintiff,» which really means the conversion was denied because the
plaintiff is the creditor and the defendant is the debtor.
In the
complaint filed yesterday in U.S. District Court in New Orleans, Public Citizen is joined as
plaintiff by lawyers William Gee III of Lafayette and Morris Bart of New Orleans.
If doctors really want to avoid
plaintiffs who
file lawsuits, they can easily run background checks on them; malpractice
complaints are a matter of public record.
The
plaintiff, a man of the sea, after paying his lawyer a fee,
filed a
complaint of several pages to recover statutory wages.
Plaintiff sustained injuries and filed a complaint against the other driver, alleging she negligently operated her vehicle causing a collision that resulted in plaintiff's personal
Plaintiff sustained injuries and
filed a
complaint against the other driver, alleging she negligently operated her vehicle causing a collision that resulted in
plaintiff's personal
plaintiff's personal injuries.
Personal injury lawsuits begin with the
filing of a
Complaint or Petition by the
plaintiff against one or more defendants.
On January 31, 2018, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC and Susman Godfrey, Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
filed a consolidated toxic tort class action
complaint on behalf of
plaintiffs against E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company (NYSE: DD), and its former wholly - owned subsidiary, The Chemours Company (NYSE: CC) with the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern Division.
In other words, will a
complaint by the debtor (as he will be a
plaintiff in superior court of Washington) to void out the quit claim deed be dismissed because he failed to
file within the 6 year clock?
The
plaintiff filed a civil rights
complaint and then brought an action on August 12, 2010.
He noted that the
plaintiffs» strategy of
filing the same boilerplate
complaint and threatening defendants with the public stigma associated with downloading porn meant that «resistance is futile.»
The court further found that as the
plaintiff did not provide notice to the second defendant within 90 days after her initial
complaint (she did not amend her
complaint until some 160 days after the initial
filing).
After we removed the action (originally brought in Circuit Court of Miller County, Arkansas, a notorious «magnet» jurisdiction) to the federal court, the
plaintiff moved to voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice so that he could
file a more «streamlined»
complaint in the state court that would defeat federal jurisdiction.