Sentences with phrase «plaintiff filed her claim»

Thus, the plaintiff filed a claim under her own insurance policy's underinsured motorist (UM) provision.

Approximately two years following the accident, the plaintiff filed a claim against the driver of the truck that rear - ended them — in addition to several parties associated with that driver.

In 2010, the plaintiff filed a claim against the city for «personal injuries, including left hip pain, right leg pain, lower back pain and herniation of her lumbar discs at L4 - 5.»

Initially, the plaintiff filed a claim against the driver who struck her friend's car.

The plaintiff filed her claim against the defendant condominium corporation within the 2 - year limitation period.

The plaintiff filed her claim in negligence against the insured nearly six years after the date of the settlement.

The defendant was not insured, so the plaintiff filed a claim with her own insurance company, Progressive, to cover the expenses related to the accident under her uninsured motorist protection.

After the plaintiff filed the claim, the insurance company sent the plaintiff a list of questions.

In a matter filed in the District Court of Santa Fe County, New Mexico, the Plaintiff filed a claim for negligent misrepresentation arising out of an inaccurate acreage figure in a MLS book.

Not exact matches

The school district is also protected from lawsuits by state statute in that plaintiffs have to give six months» notice before filing a claim.

The bill opened a one - year window to revive expired California sex - abuse claims, some from seventy years ago, and more than a thousand plaintiffs then filed previously expired claims.

At the time plaintiff filed the motion for default judgment in default of defence, the defendants had not been served with any Statement of Claim as required under the Rules of Court in support of the amended Writ of Summons to which they could respond by way of a statement of defence.

«' These guidance documents — which are the focal point of plaintiffs» claims — are merely expressions of agencies» views as to what the law requires,»» the filing reads.

A New York federal judge granted Jay Z $ 8,000 in attorneys» fees in a lawsuit filed by an artist who claims to have helped create the logo for Roc - A-Fella Records, after the plaintiff and his attorney were sanctioned in December for failing to produce discoverable evidence.

In October, attorneys for the plaintiffs — potentially several thousand residents of Hoosick Falls — filed an amended federal complaint expanding their injury claim.

The sentences do not specify that plaintiffs need not have filed a notice of claim, a required step when suing a government entity.

The class action, filed on behalf of 14 needy Philadelphia students and 12 public - interest organizations, claims the university has not abided by an 1977 city ordinance that the plaintiffs believe requires Penn to provide 125 so - called «Mayor's scholarships» for each entering class.

The lawsuit, filed by the nonprofit Public Interest Law Office of Rochester in September 1998, claims that the state has deprived the plaintiffs — all low - income black and Hispanic students — of their rights under the state constitution to a sound basic education by failing to alleviate concentrations of poverty in the 37,000 - student Rochester school district.

The class action was filed earlier this month in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, in Washington, on behalf of some 100,000 individuals who attended such schools from 1890 until the present day, said Jeffrey M. Herman, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs.

The case — Houston Federation of Teachers et al. v. Houston ISD — was filed in 2014 and just yesterday, United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm. Smith denied in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, the district's request for summary judgment given the plaintiffs» due process claims.

Having lost in district court, plaintiffs filed their opening appellate brief defending their state - law claims regarding investments of Vanguard mutual fund assets in foreign gambling businesses.

«These unsubstantiated allegations stem from a single lawsuit filed against us by a single plaintiff who claims that levels of lead were found in three of our products that could be dangerous to pet health.

The 24 - page lawsuit was filed after the plaintiff claimed his dog, a 4 - year old Cocker Spaniel / Poodle mix, experienced kidney disease and ultimately kidney failure as a result of ingesting the Blue Buffalo dog food products as his primary source of food.

«The Infinity Ward Employee Group», 38 plaintiffs either current or former employees at the developer, filed a claim in the Los Angeles Superior Court against Activision.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of America Inc.'s (collectively «Defendants») on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker's («Baker») claims for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 2017.

In one of the original climate lawsuits, filed in 2008 on behalf of the Alaskan village of Kivalina, the plaintiffs made the same claims as New York City, Oakland, and San Francisco — including the specific citation of «potentially irreversible» impacts and a «significant loss of life» as a result of climate change.

Former ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson, Donald Trump's pick for Secretary of State, is set to be deposed today by lawyers for a group of 21 young plaintiffs, aged 9 to 20, who filed a lawsuit claiming the U.S. government failed to protect their rights to life, liberty, and property by not taking action to halt global warming.

Chevron's filing also cites numerous statutes that refute the plaintiffs» claims that fossil fuels unreasonably interfere with public rights, including the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1992, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Mining and Minerals Policy Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and the Federal Lands Policy Management Act, all of which specifically call for the production of oil and natural gas within the United States:

For these reasons and more, cases asserting nearly identical claims — including several filed by the same private lawyers representing Plaintiffs here — have been repeatedly rejected by U.S. courts.

In what may be an unprecedented move, 23 Texans who host wind turbines on their property have filed suit against two different wind farm developers, claiming that companies «carelessly and negligently failed to adequately disclose the true nature and effects that the wind turbines would have on the community, including the plaintiffs» homes.»

Especially in light of the fact that the plaintiff's claims were dismissed over a month before the counterclaims were filed?

ATRA also provides a «watch list» of jurisdictions that could become trouble and doles out «dishonorable mentions» to the supreme courts of Massachusetts and Missouri — the former for a ruling about doctors» duty to warn of a drug's side effects and the latter for a ruling «that effectively invites plaintiffs from all around the country to file claims in the Show Me (Your Lawsuits) State.»

He falsely represented that the tenant had filed a claim for personal injury against the plaintiffs and then took $ 130,000 from the plaintiffs to settle the non-existent claim.

Other plaintiffs have filed their claims in state courts as individual claimants.

A defendant in an existing case may file a third - party claim against someone other than the plaintiff because the outcome of the case between the plaintiff and the defendant will affect the rights or responsibilities of that third party.

The plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit against the school, claiming that it was negligent in allowing the students to play floor hockey and in using the wrong equipment.

The case presented the court with the opportunity to discuss whether the plaintiff's late - filed notice of expert testimony should be admitted, and if not, whether the plaintiff's claim must fail as a result.

The plaintiff had filed a survival and wrongful death lawsuit against a hospital, claiming it was negligent and grossly negligent in treating the plaintiff in 2014.

Plaintiffs began filing lawsuits across the country claiming the filters caused harm and death, alleging manufacturers» negligence, failure to warn, design defects, manufacturing defects, breach of implied warranty and negligent misrepresentation on the part the companies and their subsidiaries.

As a result of his fall, the plaintiff sustained serious injuries and filed a personal injury claim against the ski resort.

The Statement of Claim filed by the proposed representative Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that Goodlife violated employment standards legislation and its contracts of employment with Class Members by requiring, permitting and / or suffering Class Members to work hours above those scheduled, including hours both above and below the overtime threshold, but failing to appropriately compensate Class Members as required for all hours worked.

Kevin explained that there are exceptions to the general rule that a plaintiff must file a medical malpractice claim within two years from the time he or she is injured.

To start an action, the plaintiff needs to file an information for Court use form and issues a statement of claim, which is served.

Plaintiff's wife filed a claim for loss of consortium.

However, the Plaintiff's statement of claim was not filed in the Supreme Court until November 6, 2017 — a year and a half after the claim decision was made and her application was denied.

The plaintiff filed a premises liability lawsuit against the realtor, claiming that the realtor was negligent in the maintenance of the diving board.

«Without congressional action, plaintiffs» lawyers will continue to file «double dip» claims against the trusts and in the courts.»

The plaintiff tried to excuse the delay, explaining that she did not know that she would need to file a claim with her own insurance company until she found out that the at - fault driver had inadequate coverage.

Then, based on the true pragmatics of the parties» positions and what occurred in lower court proceedings, the appellate court determined that trustee, not plaintiff, had prevailed: it remained neutral on the contract claims by filing the nonmonetary status declaration (in stark contrast to the trustee in Kachlon v. Markowitz, 168 Cal.App.4 th 316, 350 (2008), which did not remain neutral and only filed the nonmonetary status declaration close to trial), and it defensed the tort claims (under which plaintiff sought to recovery money against trustee).

The contingency fee method of payment is in place to protect you, the plaintiff, at all times and this is why so many people with vehicle accident claims to file across Kansas and Missouri choose the personal injury attorneys at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. to work with.