Next,
the plaintiff presents evidence by calling witnesses and asking questions.
Once
the plaintiff presents evidence to support that prima facie case, the burden shifts to the defendant to present evidence that the policy had a legitimate business purpose.
At trial,
the plaintiff presented evidence showing that he sustained injuries.
Here,
the plaintiffs presented some evidence that the step down created a dangerous condition.
The Plaintiff presented evidence that several years earlier, the defendant driver had previously parked his truck in the exact same location, which resulted in a similar accident under almost exactly the same circumstances.
The court further held that that the controversy was not ripe because
the plaintiffs presented no evidence that a Pennsylvania court or agency had interpreted the amended Canon from prohibiting the speech sought in the questionnaire.
At trial,
plaintiff presented evidence, in the form of expert testimony, that there is no known threshold of asbestos exposure at which mesothelioma will not occur, and thus each exposure to asbestos that the decedent experienced from laundering her father's clothes and being in proximity to brake products contributed to her total dose of asbestos and were substantial contributing factors to the causation of her mesothelioma.
At trial,
the plaintiff presented evidence of damages far in excess of the $ 25,000.
During the trial,
the plaintiff presented evidence of the defendant's driving history, which contained two prior instances in which the defendant was cited for driving while under the influence of alcohol in 1996 and 1983.
However,
Plaintiffs presented evidence of a Traffic Advisory Committee report in 2003 that noted a «pattern of collisions» at the same location, all at night.
Not exact matches
Second, OHS promulgated this rule without providing notice or the opportunity to comment as required by the Administrative Procedure Act («APA»), thereby depriving
Plaintiff States of the opportunity to
present important
evidence to OHS about the overwhelming success of the DACA program in
Plaintiff States as part of the rulemaking process.
The
plaintiffs have
presented evidence that the Georgia procedure is so restrictive, no statewide petition in Georgia has succeeded since 2000.
Indeed, even before the verdict, members of the
plaintiffs» team were talking confidently about plans to
present their
evidence to California Gov. Jerry Brown, a close ally of the teachers unions, to prod him into joining the reformers» side, at least on key issues such as teacher tenure.
As defendants, the state and its two biggest teachers unions tried to persuade the judge that in four weeks of testimony, the
plaintiffs — nine students — did not
present enough
evidence to prove that the five contested statutes governing teacher dismissal, tenure and layoffs deny students right to an effective education.
The preponderance of
evidence, including research
presented by the
plaintiffs in this case and noted by the court, shows that special population funding levels are dramatically lower than what is needed to provide an excellent education to many Texas students.
During the trial,
Plaintiffs have
presented evidence of the substantial harms imposed on students by California's permanent employment, dismissal, and seniority - based layoff laws.
If you
present the wrong piece of
evidence to the judge and jury too many times, the judge will side with the
plaintiff and you'll lose the case, ultimately losing the game.
You will notice in the article that he writes «The
plaintiffs counter with a 45 - page brief...» The
plaintiffs never counter... it is the defense that counters the
evidence presented by the
plaintiffs which is what I did.
While the obligation on the judge isn't new, this statement makes clear the importance of ensuring that litigants without lawyers are able to meaningfully participate in the legal action, whether as
plaintiffs or respondents and further that they have the opportunity to
present their position and
evidence to the best of their individual ability.
[60] Simply put, I do not think a manufacturer should be able to escape liability for failing to give a warning it was under a duty to give, by simply
presenting evidence tending to establish that even if the doctor had been given the warning, he or she would not have passed it on to the patient, let alone putting an onus on the
plaintiff to do so.
However, the court also noted that the defendant did
present evidence contesting the
plaintiff's claim that he will continue to experience pain and suffering.
The dispute in this case was regarding the
evidence presented to prove that the
plaintiff's injuries were directly related to the accident with the defendant.
Since the
plaintiff did not
present evidence showing how long the barrel had been there, there was no way the
plaintiff could prove that the department had actual or constructive knowledge of the barrel's placement.
This motion asks the court to dismiss the case without requiring the defendant to
present any
evidence, asserting that the
plaintiff failed to show that a question of material fact is in dispute.
In response, the defense
presented evidence that the
plaintiff was fully healed and would not continue to experience pain in the future.
There was also
evidence presented that the
plaintiff endured pain and suffering after the accident and that he would continue to experience ongoing pain in the future.
No
evidence was
presented with respect to the salary or any other terms or conditions of the first offer of employment although the
plaintiff testified that he thought the salary in the first offer was less than the salary in the offer that he accepted.
In district court cases (case values of $ 30,000 or less), the
plaintiff will often
present this
evidence directly with the medical bills.
The
plaintiff asked the court for a new trial as to damages only, arguing that the jury - determined award was greatly insufficient given the
evidence presented.
In the case of Andrade v. Walgreens - Optioncare, Inc., the judge precluded Walgreens from
presenting evidence relating to
Plaintiff's (Andrade) immigration status under FRE 403.
Barking Hound argued that the trial court erred in not granting summary judgment on this claim because the
plaintiff had failed to
present evidence that the deceased dog had actual market value, which Barking Hound contends is the sole form of damages recoverable.
Both the
plaintiff and the insurance company
presented evidence supporting their respective side in the form of expert witness testimony.
In most Connecticut personal injury claims, the
plaintiff is required to
present direct
evidence that the defendant acted negligently by doi...
The court disagreed, finding that the
plaintiff's
evidence showed that a defect was indeed
present and visible to passersby.
You have the right to defend yourself,
present evidence in support of your case, and call witnesses to contradict the
plaintiff's story.
Since there was no such
evidence presented by the
plaintiffs, the jury was legally prevented from finding that the park management was negligent.
At trial, both the
plaintiff and the defendant will have an opportunity to
present the testimony of witnesses and any
evidence they believe help prove their claims.
The «preponderance of the
evidence» standard has been defined to mean that the
evidence presented by
plaintiffs must be more likely to be true or accurate than not true.
The
plaintiff presented sufficient
evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that in - person attendance was not an essential function of her job for the ten - week period she requested to work from home, the court said.
Specifically, the case deals with the quantum of
evidence a
plaintiff must provide in order to
present a legally sufficient case.
At trial, the
plaintiff presents the written contract as real
evidence of the agreement she and the defendant made and that the defendant breached when he didn't have the cash for the
plaintiff on September 20 as stated.
In a decision issued today, the Washington Court of Appeals has embraced the broad consensus among state and federal courts holding that
plaintiffs who want courts to force service providers to provide identifying information about anonymous online speakers must both provide notice to the speakers and
present evidence of wrongdoing....
In fact, during oral argument on the motion for summary judgment, Justice Schmidt allowed the
plaintiff's counsel to supplement its written filings by
presenting evidence to support each instance of an alleged breach of fiduciary duty.
After the trial, the totality of the
evidence presented at trial by the
plaintiff rests on one side of the scale.
The clear medical
evidence from the
plaintiff's orthopedic surgeon, Dr. G.M. McKensie, is that Mr. Swieczko's soft tissue injuries are now chronic and permanent,
presenting as moderate to severe pain in the neck, mid-back and lower back with persistent flare - ups as a result of overtime work, attempts at physically interacting with his growing one - year - old daughter and attempts to reintegrate previously enjoyed recreational activities.
[53] The
evidence shows that the majority of the symptoms that the
plaintiff attributes to injuries from the 2011 accident probably were
present before that accident.
In response to her request to bring the case to trial, the insurance company argued that the
plaintiff had not
presented any
evidence of causation, and moved for summary dismissal of the suit.
PC -2008-1134, Judge Sarah Taft - Carter held that while the existence of such a duty is determined on a case - by - case basis, the
plaintiffs had
presented sufficient
evidence to establish that Crane Co. had a duty to protect against such «secondary» or «take - home» exposure.
The Court commented that the
plaintiff failed to obtain an air quality analysis of the air in her condominium and failed to
present expert
evidence to prove that the poor air quality was caused by the improper repair and installation of the boiler in her condominium unit.
The court ruled that summary judgment was not appropriate because the
evidence submitted to the court
presented contradictory theories that should be resolved at a trial: namely whether the defendant's conduct was the cause of an injury to the
plaintiffs» loved one.