Not exact matches
ATRA also
provides a «watch list» of jurisdictions that could become trouble and doles out «dishonorable mentions» to the supreme courts of Massachusetts and Missouri — the former for a ruling about doctors» duty to warn of a drug's
side effects and the latter for a ruling «that effectively invites
plaintiffs from all around the country to file claims in the Show Me (Your Lawsuits) State.»
The Fact Sheets are agreed - upon documents that each
plaintiff and defendant fills out to
provide the opposing
side with some good preliminary information.
i'd be interested to see what would happen if the
plaintiff had found an expert of the same caliber to
provide support for the IP rights
side.
We find that our experience, stature, and relationships in the
plaintiffs» antitrust bar help us
provide the most effective representation on the defense
side and vice versa.
Siding with the
plaintiff, the Court
provides a useful discussion of the embezzlement and the wilfull and malicious injury bankruptcy discharge exceptions.
«Civil Rights:
Plaintiffs Successfully Challenging Anti-Gang Injunction Have Substantial Fee Award Of Over $ 3.2 Million Affirmed Main Costs: $ 107,292.56 Costs Award Reversed Based On 2005 Final Judgment
Providing Each
Side Bears Own Costs»
Is this a change in the law of defamation, where symbolic damages of one dollar have at least
provided vindication (and where the
plaintiff presumably recovered some of his / her costs from the other
side)?