Sentences with phrase «plaintiffs alleged»

Plaintiffs alleged that New England - based C&S and Supervalu, another leading wholesaler based in the Midwest, entered into a conspiracy to allocate the New England and Midwest territories between themselves for a period of five years, resulting in inflated grocery prices.

The plaintiffs alleged that Atlas misrepresented its prospectuses, financial statements and press releases.

The plaintiffs alleged that improper use of the product could result in sudden cardiac arrest.

Plaintiffs alleged that defendants were in violation of the CWA because defendant (or «Kinder Morgan») discharged pollutants into navigable waters without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System («NPDES») permit.

Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that zinc contained in the denture creams manufactured by P&G and others caused neurological problems.

Weil successfully represented Procter & Gamble (P&G) as lead counsel in a high - profile MDL in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in which plaintiffs alleged that they were injured through their use of the popular denture cream, Fixodent.

In 2013, after a two - month jury trial in federal court in Minnesota, Zelle attorneys helped obtain a complete defense verdict in a case where plaintiffs alleged the bank misrepresented its securities lending program and purchased unsuitable, high - risk investments causing plaintiffs to lose millions of dollars.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants did not take appropriate steps to implement the tracking technology needed to count unique users.

Securing jury verdicts in favor of shipowners in state and federal court trials in Wisconsin and Michigan involving cases in which the plaintiffs alleged career - ending injuries.

The plaintiffs alleged the security company owed a duty of care to both the band and those attending the concert.

The plaintiffs alleged a delay in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, causing a loss of life expectancy, pain and suffering, loss of consortium, lost wages, and medical costs.

The plaintiffs alleged that, in September 2008, the bank fraudulently induced them to -LSB-...]

The plaintiffs alleged that exposure to benzene had resulted in a «cancer cluster» among former students of Beverly Hills High School.

The plaintiffs alleged their athlete son underwent a shoulder surgery he did not need, resulting in pain that will follow him the rest of his life.

Plaintiffs alleged that a self - proving will dated Oct. 7, 2004, was the last true will and testament of the decedent.

Defended offshore petroleum drilling company, where plaintiffs alleged that defendants conspired to suppress the wages paid to workers in violation of the antitrust laws

In the Jones matter, the plaintiffs alleged that the decedent, Iva Pearl Jones («Ms. Jones») was exposed to asbestos from the clothing of her brother - in - law, Stanley Nichols («Mr. Nichols») while Mr. Nichols was employed by Crane Co. from 1979 to 1980 and resided in the same home as Ms. Jones and other family members.

The plaintiffs alleged that Crane Co. failed to take adequate precautions to prevent asbestos fibers from leaving the work site and failed to warn employees of a foreseeable risk of take - home exposures to their cohabitants.

Plaintiffs alleged the Defendant physician negligently failed to appropriately order, manage and monitor the Decedent's anticoagulation therapy resulting in a brain bleed and her death on August 3, 2011.

The plaintiffs alleged that Tim Hortons violated the Competition Act's conspiracy and criminal price maintenance provisions by agreeing with its distributor to raise prices for Always Fresh baked goods.

The plaintiffs alleged that locks on Mazda3 cars were defective.

The plaintiffs alleged that the solicitors were trustees of the money for them, and that the law firm owed them a duty of care.

The plaintiffs alleged that the tax opinion provided by the defendant solicitors to the scheme's promoters on the efficacy of the program was negligent, and that the solicitors should have known that the tax credits would be disallowed by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

The plaintiffs alleged that the solicitor should have attempted to negotiate for additional security from the vendor, even though the agreement was fully executed before he was retained.

In Warden v. State Bar of California, 21 Cal.4 th 628 (1999), Jim also represented the Bar in a lawsuit in which the plaintiffs alleged the exemptions from the MCLE (continuing education) program were unconstitutional.

2103 and 3582, decided June 23, 2010 (D.C. S.D. N.Y.), a case in which the plaintiffs alleged direct and secondary infringement claims, including claims for «inducement» contributory liability.

After several years, plaintiffs alleged that Marathon exposed them to noxious odors, chemicals, and dust, exacerbating pre-existing ailments.

The case dealt with a nuisance claim that involved emissions from steel production that, plaintiffs alleged, interfered with their property rights «and the integrity of their persons.»

Plaintiffs alleged that Con Edison's negligence was the cause of this tragic explosion and sought significant money damages.

The lead plaintiffs alleged that MDC had, inter alia, violated federal securities laws in the manner by which it disclosed certain executive compensation, and in its calculation and presentation of goodwill and the non-GAAP financial metric, EBITDA.

The plaintiffs alleged breach of contract and negligence against Desjardins for failing to ensure that appropriate fire protection and supression systems were included in the design of the plant.

The plaintiffs alleged that under the wording of the investor passes, the holder is entitled «to the free use of all ski lifts operated by (Sherburne) Killington Ltd. at (Killington Basin) Killington Ski Area so long as the corporation shall operate in that area under an agreement with the state of Vermont.»

The plaintiffs alleged the bid process was a sham and took several parties, including First Capital, to court.

Plaintiffs alleged that various doctors and the hospital were negligent in performing an emergency Cesarean section and that the on - duty obstetrical resident was liable for allegedly failing to obtain the Plaintiff - mother's informed consent prior to surgery.

Here, the plaintiffs alleged that Sears was trying to delay the case, so that Case Management was necessary to keep the claims moving.

Defense verdicts in two cases tried simultaneously where the plaintiffs each alleged they had contracted symptomatic asbestosis as a result of exposure to asbestos.

The plaintiffs alleged that the oil companies were in possession of «smoking gun» documents that would prove their liability; Mr. Boutrous said this was simply an internal summary of the publicly available 1995 IPCC report.

«The plaintiffs alleged that the oil companies were in possession of «smoking gun» documents that would prove their liability» Who said it was a «smoking gun»?

«Do we have the scene of death and destruction that the plaintiffs alleged or not?

Plaintiffs alleged various violations of ERISA related to the cancellation of a group annuity contract.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs alleged that the price - fixing between Apple and the publishers pushed the cost on some e-books to $ 12.99 or $ 14.99 from the $ 9.99 charged by Amazon.

Plaintiffs alleged in their lawsuit that HB7069 took away some of the constitutional powers to make decisions about public schools and undermined local control of public schools.

They get shuffled around, as the Vergara plaintiffs alleged in what's known as «the dance of the lemons.»

In Seattle, the plaintiffs alleged that school segregation unconstitutionally reflected not only generalized societal discrimination and residential housing patterns, but also school board policies and actions that had helped to create, maintain, and aggravate racial segregation.

The plaintiffs alleged, and the court narrowly concurred, that the program violated a provision of the state constitution that school boards «shall have control of instruction in the public schools of their respective districts.»

The anti-choice plaintiffs alleged that the state constitution's mandate that the state provide a «uniform system of common schools» means that the state may only fund that system, and not an «alternative» system that includes «non-common, non-uniform private schools and home - based schooling.»

The plaintiffs alleged «violations of the state and federal constitution, including allegedly insufficient attention to county representation.»

The plaintiffs alleged that this tabulation method dilutes the voting power of citizens residing in districts that are home to smaller concentrations of non-voting residents.

Plaintiffs alleged that First Solar hid these defects and their cost and scope from the market and misrepresented key data in their financial statements.

The plaintiffs alleged that this practice was revealed to the market when another healthcare company, Tenet Healthcare, filed a suit against Community.