Sentences with phrase «plaintiffs alleging their use»

Just three days after a Missouri appeals court vacated the first of four monstrous, if scientifically groundless verdicts won since 2015 in St. Louis by plaintiffs alleging their use of talcum powder caused ovarian cancer, a trial judge in Los Angles last Friday reversed a $ 417 million plaintiff's verdict in a comparable case.

Just three days after a Missouri appeals court vacated the first of four monstrous, if scientifically groundless verdicts won since 2015 in St. Louis by plaintiffs alleging their use of talcum powder caused ovarian cancer, a trial judge in Los Angles last Friday reversed a $ 417 million plaintiff's verdict in a comparable case... → Read More: Another Scientifically Groundless Talc Verdict Falls, This Time in Los Angeles

Not exact matches

The plaintiffs allege the ride - hailing company discriminates against people who use wheelchairs by not making available wheelchair - accessible cars in the San Francisco Bay Area.

The plaintiffs also allege that they have been injured because some of their children attend public schools, and because when a student uses a private scholarship to switch from public to private school it reduces district funding.

Plaintiffs who brought this case, Southern Legal Foundation supporters, allege that public dollars can not be used to support a privately funded scholarship program where children use the money to attend private religious schools and donors receive state tax credits.

The plaintiffs in Duncan v. State of Nevada (see Legal Clips for background on suit) asserted a constitutional challenge to SB 302, alleging that it diverts public funds to private schools, many of which are religious, in violation of Article 11, Section 10 (which prohibits public funds from being used for sectarian purpose).

To plead a violation of those statutes, Plaintiffs must allege that Petland used the mails and wires to perpetrate a plan to defraud them.

Moreover, the plaintiff alleging unauthorized use of his likeness must show that the likeness was recognizable.

As Walter Olson at Overlawyered shared yesterday, Seidel was hit with a subpoena by the plaintiffs lawyer Clifford Shoemaker in Sykes v. Bayer, a case that alleges that mercury used in the vaccine caused a plaintiff's autism.

Plaintiffs allege the facility and its administrators committed elder financial abuse and fraudulent business practices by not disclosing that patient care assessments weren't used to establish staffing budget.

One plaintiff alleged that only a single caregiver was available in a unit of more than 12 dementia patients who required assistance with everyday tasks, such as showering, using the toilet, showering, walking, feeding and grooming.

The plaintiffs alleged that under the wording of the investor passes, the holder is entitled «to the free use of all ski lifts operated by (Sherburne) Killington Ltd. at (Killington Basin) Killington Ski Area so long as the corporation shall operate in that area under an agreement with the state of Vermont.»

The class action was certified on the basis that the representative plaintiff alleged that his personal information was used fraudulently.

Basically, this is to protect people who are exercising legal free speech and fair use rights from suffering legal burdens of fighting a case where the plaintiff alleges copyright or defamation charges against defendant when that is of extremely questionable grounds.

Dilshod Marupov and other plaintiffs allege the ministry failed to enforce statutory requirements for safety; failed to properly train its employees to inspect the scaffolding and enforce statutory safety requirements; and hired employees who were incompetent and did not use the requisite care in inspecting the premises and scaffolding, as well as other allegations.

The plaintiff, a trucking company, brought a trademark infringement suit against the defendant, a truck driver job posting website, alleging unauthorized use of the plaintiff's trademark on the defendant's website.

The Plaintiff was alleged to have a history of illicit drug use during part of this period.

The plaintiffs nowhere affirm, that private property has been taken for public use, by the state, in the exercise of the eminent domain; nor do the defendants allege it, nor do the court below; on the contrary, Chief Justice PARKER says, 7 Pick.

If the surveillance is good, and it reveals that the plaintiff has physical abilities that contradict the limitations they have alleged in their statement of claim or have confirmed during examinations for discovery, this evidence can be used to impugn the validity of the plaintiff's claim.

Defending a pharmaceutical company in an action arising out of the plaintiff's use of a statin medication, which use, she alleges, resulted in her needing a liver transplant.

The plaintiff alleged the defendant should have performed the surgery using a posterior approach, or should have referred the plaintiff to a specialist with more experience with OPLL.

Weil successfully represented Procter & Gamble (P&G) as lead counsel in a high - profile MDL in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in which plaintiffs alleged that they were injured through their use of the popular denture cream, Fixodent.

The plaintiff in this action alleged that CBSI had used student - athletes» names, images, and likenesses, without their consent, in connection with its provision of services to NCAA member institutions» sale of photographs of student - athletes through the schools» official athletic websites.

The plaintiffs alleged that improper use of the product could result in sudden cardiac arrest.

The firm successfully challenged the validity of an Anton Piller order based on the alleged illegal use of the plaintiff's intellectual property in the satellite communications industry.

The plaintiff alleged wrongs arising out of the words the CBC used in its broadcast and the CBC's «investigative techniques.»

The remainder of the litigation, against the United States government for the alleged involvement of federal employees in administering plaintiff's compassionate use protocol, was ultimately dismissed a couple of months ago on grounds of sovereign immunity.

He also had the Appeals Court reverse a Federal Court decision involving the Falmouth Police Department in a case where the Plaintiff alleged excessive force was used during his arrest.

«Using these sharp business tactics, defendant gives less storage capacity than advertised, only to offer to sell that capacity in a desperate moment, e.g., when a consumer is trying to record or take photos at a child or grandchild's recital, basketball game or wedding,» plaintiffs allege in the complaint.

The plaintiffs allege that the real estate professionals breached their fiduciary duty by failing to open escrow, failing to deposit the purchasers» deposit into escrow, failing to notify the seller that timing was critical because the transaction was part of a Section 1031 exchange transaction, failing to identify alternate properties, and failing to use correct forms.

«The plaintiffs have clearly alleged that: (1) all of the defendants, except Tom Bosley, were parties to the initial settlement agreement; (2) this settlement agreement required the defendants to change and / or maintain their rules so as to permit the plaintiffs to provide their new flat fee business program to consumers, together with the authorized use of MLS services, without providing traditional offer negotiation services; and (3) the defendants «blatantly» breached the express and / or implied terms of that settlement agreement by unlawfully causing CREA to subsequently enact new offer negotiation rules which prohibited the plaintiff's innovative flat fee business model.»

'' (12) The Defendant alleges that Bell, through the use of the Plaintiff's password and user ID has been «scraping» all the listing data from the member database and copying it to the Real Estate Plus website without regard to the owner / brokers directions.»