Not exact matches
Lawyers for State Senate co-presidents Jeff Klein and Dean Skelos along with Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver have pushed to be «intervenor»
plaintiffs, effectively joining a half - dozen private law firms that employ lawmakers as those firms
challenge the commission's subpoenas for
client lists and invoices.
success in defending the standard of care requires more effort than ever in the
challenging economy since the 2007 - 2008 market collapse, because some former
clients are hurting financially and can make sympathetic
plaintiffs.
Mass Torts Made Perfect is a CLE - accredited seminar designed to help
plaintiff attorneys attract more
clients and prepare for trials against tough opponents by presenting solutions to new legal
challenges.
The
challenge: convincing
plaintiffs» attorneys that this service actually serves their
clients, the true victims in this game of chance.
With our highly imaginative professionals and solutions, we are prepared to meet those
challenges and advance those goals as ardently as our
clients do for their
clients, the individual
plaintiffs.
Conclusion Although the diagnoses of chronic pain, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue present
challenges to
plaintiffs» lawyers because they can not be objectively measured, counsel may still achieve fair and equitable results for
clients suffering from one of these conditions.
After years of overcoming
plaintiff ESI production
challenges, we have time - tested methodologies to review documents, issue code the data important to your case and translate foreign documents while keeping costs to our
clients, and their
clients, low.
Third Circuit grants
plaintiffs» petition for permission to appeal in case
challenging the lawfulness of GSK's diversity re-removals of state court Paxil personal injury cases more than one year after the cases were filed in state court: This afternoon, a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit entered an order granting my
clients» petition for permission to appeal in a case presenting the question «Whether a defendant may remove a case a second time based on diversity jurisdiction more than one year after the commencement of the case?»