Sentences with phrase «plaintiffs during the proceedings»

Not exact matches

He cited plaintiffs» witnesses who testified during the eight - week trial that dismissal proceedings can take two years or more and cost $ 50,000 to $ 450,000.

In Imperial Oil v. Jacques, 2014 SCC 66 the court upheld the ruling of a trial judge that allowed the plaintiffs in a class action to access government surveillance materials during civil discovery proceedings.

The plaintiff argued that the threatened acquisition of property for use as parkland by eminent domain during land use proceedings was a taking warranting payment of just compensation.

At one point during the litigation proceedings, counsel for the Plaintiff brought an application for summary judgement pursuant to Rule 9 - 6 to strike the part of the Defendant's Response that relied on the Section 24 «reasonable efforts» defence in the Insurance (Vehicle) Act.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

The judge hearing the matter noted that all of the breaches alleged arose in the early stages of the plaintiff's proceedings during which the defendant's partner, and not the defendant, represented the plaintiff.

-LSB-...] The Defendants / Responding parties consent to the Plaintiff making use of a high back chair during the proceedings and to the aforementioned items 1 to 7.

Specifically, the Judge stated that the jury would be instructed about the data loss and that the lost data affirmatively would have provided information relevant to the claims and defenses; defendant would be precluded from offering certain evidence in support of its defense; plaintiff would be able to re-depose, at defendant's cost, defendant's key witnesses about belatedly produced «substitute» data; and defendant would be responsible for 75 % of the Special Master's fees and costs and 50 % of plaintiff's attorneys» fees incurred during the Special Master proceedings.