Not exact matches
The Judge
held that the
plaintiff had followed the advice of her healthcare providers in an exemplary manner, including taking medication, undergoing physiotherapy, and withdrawing from her part - time
job so that she could recover.
At the certification motion, the
plaintiffs in Brown had proposed a class definition consisting of employees who had worked for CIBC after 1996 and
held the
job titles of analyst, investment advisor, or associate investment advisor.
It also
held that the
plaintiff had a duty to preserve the
job order files that was bolstered by its own termination letter, which said it would make the records available to the defendant in the event of litigation.
The
plaintiffs claimed that blacks are significantly less likely to
hold jobs requiring advanced education, therefore making insurance rates higher for black people.
In Kennedy v. Applause, Inc., the district court
held that the
plaintiff, who suffered from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, was not a qualified individual with a disability, as she was totally disabled and could not have performed the essential functions of her
job even with reasonable accommodation.
In Miller v. Dep» t of Corrections of the State of Illinois, the district court
held that a blind
plaintiff was not a «qualified individual,» as she was not able, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions of the
job.