Sentences with phrase «plaintiffs in the case over»

4 More Miramonte School Students File Lawsuits in Child Abuse Case The list of plaintiffs in the case over alleged child abuse by teachers at Miramonte Elementary School is getting a little longer.

Not exact matches

In any case, in addition to the court - determined fair value price, the plaintiff also gets accrued interest of 5 % over the federal funds ratIn any case, in addition to the court - determined fair value price, the plaintiff also gets accrued interest of 5 % over the federal funds ratin addition to the court - determined fair value price, the plaintiff also gets accrued interest of 5 % over the federal funds rate.

Over the past decade, nearly 40 percent of all patent cases in the U.S. have been filed in Marshall and Tyler, Texas, two places known for their plaintiff - friendly decisions and sky - high court costs.

Judge Claudia Wilken, who presided over the O'Bannon case, issued an order declaring that the NCAA and some of the conferences will have to defend the rules against players receiving more than tuition, room and board (and now a cost - of - attendance stipend) in open court in a case brought by a plaintiff group that includes former Clemson cornerback Martin Jenkins and former Wisconsin forward Nigel Hayes.

The report comes as government reform groups and some media organizations are urging Gov. Andrew Cuomo to sign a bill that would bolster the ability of plaintiffs in FOIL cases to be awarded attorneys» fees when they are successful in suing over access to government records.

The following year, after the nationwide scandal over bank employees signing thousands of foreclosure documents without proper review, known as robosigning, broke, New York began requiring plaintiffs in foreclosure cases to affirm the accuracy of their documents.

According to him, since the case is now in court he will wait until it is called, adding he followed due process and will not get himself entangled in a dispute between the plaintiff and her family over the sold land.

The 80 minutes of occasionally spirited argument at the high court this morning focused on the two main issues in the greenhouse gas litigation: For the case to go forward, the plaintiffs must prove that the case has legal standing (they must show that the court is the right venue for resolving this dispute), and that the common law definition of nuisance can support suits over greenhouse gases.

Finest selection of Transsexual Escorts New York, Manhattan, Online Dating Waco Tx Baylor ordered to provide sex assault reports dating to 2003 — WACO, Texas (AP)-- A judge has ordered Baylor University to turn over to plaintiffs» attorneys records of all cases of sexual assault and harassment since 2003 in a lawsuit against the nation's largest Baptist school.

Baylor ordered to provide sex assault reports dating to 2003 — WACO, Texas (AP)-- A judge has ordered Baylor University to turn over to plaintiffs» attorneys records of all cases of sexual assault and harassment since 2003 in a lawsuit against the nation's largest Baptist school.

His friend Brett vehemently discourages his pal's plan, but still hands over an envelop containing the profiles of all the plaintiffs in the court case.

The fiery California atheist who last week lost his bid at the U.S. Supreme Court to get «under God» stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance vows to continue the fight with new plaintiffs, preferably in cases against school districts all over the country.

The answer is for states to vigorously defend such cases in order to avoid ceding control over education policy to plaintiffs and the courts.

Nevertheless, the report has gotten a second life in progressive circles, likely due to concerns over the U.S. Supreme Court case Friedrichs v. the California Teachers Association that could significantly harm the finances of unions should the verdict (due in early 2016) go to the plaintiff.

Leading up to oral arguments for Friedrichs v. California E4E conducted a survey of over 1,000 members — current classroom teachers from across the country — and found that a majority of teachers support paying fair - share fees and were opposed to the plaintiffs» position in this case.

The plaintiff in the case was Mark Tetzlaff, 57, a man who owed over $ 260,000 in student loans.

You might not have heard about it — but over the last few years there was a case working its way through the court system that could have made it easier for student loans to be discharged.The plaintiff in the case was Mark Tetzlaff, 57, a man who owed over $ 260,000 in student loans.

In this case, however, the plaintiffs are receiving lease payments and tax benefits that will exceed $ 50 million over the life of the projects.

In King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquIn King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.»

That was a builder's lien case and in that class of case, one would expect a swifter pace to the action than might be the case of say a personal injury case where a very serious injury and the course of recovery of a plaintiff must be assessed over time.

The complexity of the case was compounded in 2010 when a litigation guardian took over the plaintiff's file because he was declared mentally incompetent to advance it following two further accidents.

However, Mr. Kraft, the plaintiff in the underlying action, argued that the allegations of liability against Mr. Kelley fell within the policy's scope of coverage because the word «use» in the motorized vehicle exclusion should be construed as meaning «some measure of operational control over» a motorized vehicle, in this case the ATV.

Only three days after Judge Kaplan's spectacular ruling in the Chevron / Ecuador case, notes Paul Barrett at Business Week, «a state appellate court in California upheld a trial judge's finding that what had been billed as a watershed liability verdict against Dole Food over pesticide use in Nicaragua was actually the product of a corrupt conspiracy by plaintiffs» lawyers.»

Choosing the right jurisdiction and venue is important, because if either one is incorrect, the case may be dismissed or «thrown out,» and the plaintiff will have to start over again in the court that does have the proper jurisdiction and venue.

In today's case (Munro v. Thompson) the Plaintiff was awarded just over $ 12,000 for injuries sustained in a 2006 BC Car CrasIn today's case (Munro v. Thompson) the Plaintiff was awarded just over $ 12,000 for injuries sustained in a 2006 BC Car Crasin a 2006 BC Car Crash.

The case went to trial, and the court found in favor of the plaintiff on the failure to supervise claim and the failure to properly inspect the premises, and it awarded over $ 50,000 in damages.

Evan Brown's Internet Cases blog flagged an interesting case over the weekend coming out of Morris County, N.J. Brown writes that the courthouse in that county provides wireless internet access, and during jury selection, plaintiffs counsel in a medical malpractice case began using his laptop to «Google» potential jurors to gain additional information about them.

An Ontario trial judge (recently) used expert evidence based on a Bayesian analysis to get the plaintiff's case over the balance of probability threshold in Goodman v. Viljoen, 2011 ONSC 821.

Notable mandates: Represent the plaintiffs in a proposed class action against provincial law enforcement agencies regarding allegedly negligent use of breathalyzer machines; acts for hundreds of pre-sale contract holders with various condominium developments who are disputing their requirement to close under consumer protection laws; defended a law firm in a four - week hearing over enforcement of a significant contingency fee agreement; acted for a number of clients in online defamation cases

This case holds that specific jurisdiction over a defendant arising solely from the fact that it sold a defective product in a particular state or country which it caused an injury to be limited to plaintiffs who actually purchased the product or suffered an injury in that state.

In the case of large corporations doing business nationwide, this usually meant that a plaintiff had a large number of states to choose from in which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuiIn the case of large corporations doing business nationwide, this usually meant that a plaintiff had a large number of states to choose from in which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuiin which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuit.

Since litigation is expensive (over a half a million was claimed by plaintiff's side in the below case), courts would not penalize a business for being overly - cautious.

As lead trial counsel in the no - fault department, Paul has obtained plaintiff's verdicts in thousands of trials as well as settled over five thousand cases during his time with the firm.

A new company, Mighty Group Inc., has initiated a program in which investors compete to offer money to plaintiffs in such cases to tide them over until their cases are decided in their favor.

We have over 35 years of experience bringing plaintiffs the justice they deserve in personal injury lawsuits, including car accident cases and wrongful death cases, among other areas.

U.S. District Court Judge Awards Over $ 2.5 Million In Fees And Costs To Lawyers Representing Two Plaintiffs In U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Case Main In The News....

With over thirty years of experience in the courtroom, extensive experience serving as both plaintiff's attorney and defense attorney and resolution of hundreds of cases as a judge utilizing his varied experience as a litigator and his skills in listening, analyzing and persuading, John is able to relate to and gain the trust of those who bring their disputes before him.

In re Biomet was a products liability case in which the defendant began review by using search terms to cull nearly 20 million documents over the objection of Plaintiffs» Steering CommitteIn re Biomet was a products liability case in which the defendant began review by using search terms to cull nearly 20 million documents over the objection of Plaintiffs» Steering Committein which the defendant began review by using search terms to cull nearly 20 million documents over the objection of Plaintiffs» Steering Committee.

The case established that the ATS provides jurisdiction over tort actions in such «foreign cubed» cases, brought by non-US plaintiffs against non-US defendants for violations of customary international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, committed outside the US.

While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding actual malice, 175 three matters must be stressed: first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the public figure concept.

In that case, the bachelor was the plaintiff and was running away from his friends with the ball over his shoulder, before falling through a plate glass window.

Mr. Cherry is nationally acclaimed for verdicts and settlements in products liability cases where, as the lead attorney for the plaintiff, he has obtained over $ 160 million for his clients.

For over thirty years, our civil litigation team has concentrated solely in personal injury law and has provided the highest level of representation for plaintiffs in complex injury cases.

Despite the plaintiff's complete failure to mitigate his damages and the unreasonableness of his decision to enter into self - employment, Browne J only reduced the notice period from twenty months to fourteen months, rather than dismissing the claim entirely or reducing the notice period to a mere few months which he found to be a reasonable time period in that case to get over the shock of dismissal.

In over 180 dangerous drug cases, plaintiffs are suing drug manufacturer Johnson & Johnson for severe liver damage that they say was caused by Tylenol.

To date, reports Bloomberg, Roche has lost 10 out of the 13 drug defect lawsuits brought over this medication since 2007, including a case in 2012 in which the manufacturer was ordered to pay two plaintiffs $ 18 million and $ 25 million verdict to another plaintiff in 2010.

The plaintiff in the case was injured in January 2010 after tripping over a carpet in his apartment, but a claim against his landlord was not filed in court until December 2011.

1/22/03, American Board of Trial Advocates / New York Bar Association Masters In Trial A Trial Demonstration in an SUV Roll - Over Case, New York, NY (Role of Plaintiff's Attorney - Cross Examination of DefendanIn Trial A Trial Demonstration in an SUV Roll - Over Case, New York, NY (Role of Plaintiff's Attorney - Cross Examination of Defendanin an SUV Roll - Over Case, New York, NY (Role of Plaintiff's Attorney - Cross Examination of Defendant)

In 2008, another federal court harshly dismissed his claims for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against two other creditors, noting that Flury had «filed eleven lawsuits against various defendants over the last four years, and with the exception of one case that ended in a default judgment, plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed every action once the defendant moved to dismiss the case or otherwise responded to the complaint.&raquIn 2008, another federal court harshly dismissed his claims for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against two other creditors, noting that Flury had «filed eleven lawsuits against various defendants over the last four years, and with the exception of one case that ended in a default judgment, plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed every action once the defendant moved to dismiss the case or otherwise responded to the complaint.&raquin a default judgment, plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed every action once the defendant moved to dismiss the case or otherwise responded to the complaint.»

Tom's litigation practice involves all aspects of intellectual property and Tom has litigated cases on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in federal courts all over the country.